Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
swedishpimple

I think the deer will die this winter.

Recommended Posts

It has been pretty cold here in Northern Minnesota. I laugh at clowns on the Twin Cities news complaining about single digits above or below, when I keep waking up to -30 like today.

Now we have had multiple -20 to -30 days and the snow is getting deep. I think the deer in the Northwoods may struggle. My early prediction is for a huge swing from 5 intensive harvest tags to 1 lottery tag.

Are we best off having the DNR play with numbers or just wait for Mother nature to wipe them out with a cold winter?? It may depend on how many deer we want to run over on the roads with an unchecked population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DNR can only regulate for what the population we have now and do what is best for the future. The cannot, however, manage for the weather. Deer are tough critters. However, I too think that the deer will suffer this winter. Might not be a bad idea to invest in some feeders if you are able. The snow doesn't look like it is going to let up anytime soon and I think that plays a much bigger role than the cold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to bring back the winter severity index. We're overdue, that's for sure. 20" of snow across much of MN already. I put a feeder up along with 2 cameras on our hunting property on Saturday. They're already talking another big storm for this weekend. I did hear a warmer than average February predicted though. We'll see...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is early but with the early cold/snow it is shaping up to be a tough winter. At least I got in a few food plots in my woods and the snow isn't too deep down there yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hunt area 172. They have given out bonus tags for quite a few years now. I think they should have gone without them this year. My group got lucky this year and did really well, however, almost everyone else I talked to up there didn't do so well, and now what is looking to be a tough winter I think we had our last good year of deer hunting for awhile. Talked with the wildlife biologist up there and he said to expect lottery for next year. last winter they when they did there ariel (sp) survey they counted 40 percent less deer from the pervious year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the DNR wants us feeding the deer. They have gone on record in the local press here several times advising against it. Feeding or baiting allows nose to nose or nose to mouth relationship which is part of the problem allowing the spread the CWD (Chronic Wasting) and Bovine TB.

Some people in the state may not care but several Northwestern counties have lost their TB Free status and some really don't want it to spread.

I also know that within the City Limits of Bemidji there is an ordinance against feeding.

I do what I can with food plots...but I will not be out there filling troughs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it funny that people here that complain about the deer herd and buck to doe ratio are promoting feeding the deer.... crazy

If ya want what you want (better ratio) you should let nature take care of it for you.

Feeding is only going to help keep a lot more does alive.

Survival of the fittest!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those bucks that have little or no fat on them from running during the rut are going to die first. How is that going to help the deer population?

How is having less deer in general going ot help deer hunting in Minnesota? 95% of the people on here that are in favor of QDM, are in areas where there is a very abundant deer population. If we have less deer, its obvious that any thoughts of QDM are going to go out the window and we will be back to trying get a healthy deer population again, which is part of QDM. Maybe some of us don't want to have to go that route again.

As for feeding, I'd bet that if it came down to feeding or a massive winter kill, the state and groups start feeding. If it came down to keeping more does alive, I would.

It sounds like you are implying that a winter kill would be a good thing, that way we wouldn't be talking about QDM any more and we can go back to shooting one deer every couple of years.

I guess I would take any type of restriction on antlers and seeing multiple deer than not seeing any at all.

Note from admin, please read forum policy before posting again, thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has CWD been found in any deer in MN? I know TB hasnt i kinda get sick of people saying that when it hasnt been found in mn. Dont feed the deer or they will spread something. Dont send you kids to school cause who knows that they could get there think about that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the DNR wants lots of things, but that is Not going to stop me from feeding Deer on my land. I Left corn standing and throw out some supplements off and on.

This, nose to nose or nose to mouth relationship hype just isn't cutting the mustard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to bring back the winter severity index.

It actually never went away. The Index is measured by combining the number of days below zero with the number of days there is 15 or more inches of snow on the ground.

Readings between 100-180 are considered moderate.

Here is a spreadsheet from last year: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/outdoor_activities/hunting/deer/wsi_spreadsheet08.pdf

Taken from the DNR HSOforum:

Research has shown that deer have the ability to withstand very cold temperatures. Deep snow is the most critical factor with 15 inches as the threshold. Extended periods of deep snow combined with cold temperatures, especially in mid to late winter, lead to deer mortality. It is estimated that about 10 percent of the deer herd typically dies in an average winter.

Fawns (less than 1 year old) are the first to starve or be killed by wolves or other predators, as they are the most expendable part of the herd. As the WSI increases to a level of 140 or higher, increased adult buck mortality is expected. Adult does are the best prepared to withstand a severe winter in the Northland, one of nature’s way of perpetuating the species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Managing Bovine Tuberculosis in Minnesota’s Wild Deer

Board of Animal Health: Current Updates

Background

Since 2005 bovine tuberculosis (TB) has been discovered in 11 cattle operations in northwestern Minnesota. The strain is consistent with bovine TB found in cattle in the southwestern U.S. and Mexico.

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) conducted surveillance for the disease in hunter-harvested deer within a 15-mile radius of the infected farms every fall since 2005. To date, the disease has been confirmed in 18 free-ranging deer, and eight deer sampled this winter are suspects for the disease and await final test results. All infected deer have been adult animals and were taken within five miles of a cluster of four bovine TB-infected cattle operations.

Because of these discoveries, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) downgraded the state's bovine TB status from "free" to "modified accredited advanced" in 2006. As a result, cattle producers across the state face mandatory testing of cattle and restrictions on cattle movement.

The discovery of additional bovine TB-infected livestock operations, as well as the increased number of infected wild deer, has resulted in the state dropping another level in status to "modified accredited" in 2008. The DNR is committed to assisting the Minnesota Board of Animal Health (BAH) in regaining the state's bovine TB-free status.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! We've had less than 3 weeks of cold and less than 2 weeks with snow deeper than 15 inches in most of the state and guys are sounding the horn to save the deer. The deer are fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those bucks that have little or no fat on them from running during the rut are going to die first. How is that going to help the deer population?

Your statements are ignorant. How is having less deer in general going ot help deer hunting in Minnesota? 95% of the people on here that are in favor of QDM, are in areas where there is a very abundant deer population. If we have less deer, its obvious that any thoughts of QDM are going to go out the window and we will be back to trying get a healthy deer population again, which is part of QDM. Maybe some of us don't want to have to go that route again.

As for feeding, I'd bet that if it came down to feeding or a massive winter kill, the state and groups start feeding. If it came down to keeping more does alive, I would.

It sounds like you are implying that a winter kill would be a good thing, that way we wouldn't be talking about QDM any more and we can go back to shooting one deer every couple of years.

I guess I would take any type of restriction on antlers and seeing multiple deer than not seeing any at all.

Just keep stirring the pot Brule.

What has the DNR been promoting for years????? Kill more does!

What do QDM folks want????? A more equal buck to doe ratio!

What part of the deer herd is highest????? Does!

I can only assume that by feeding deer the majority of the deer that will utilize this feed are the does, being that the majority of the deer out there are does.

A healthy herd is a smaller balanced herd, a FITTER herd! How do you increase a deer herds fitness, by taking out the weak!

So in a way, yes, I guess I am hoping for somewhat of a winter kill. For the benefit of the deer herd, not my own selfish wants!

Note from admin, please read forum policy before posting again, thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I would have to agree with that... kill the weak and sick. wolves do a great job doing that as well. I would probably think that is why we haven't been affect by that chronic wasting. TB was getting to be a problem a few years ago but haven't heard much about that lately.

yup IMO wolves and cold = stronger deer heard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing that I would like to say is that I respect everyones opinions and I enjoy reading peoples posts. With that said, I would have to agree with BuckKiller's statements when he says "nature can take care of itself" and "IMO wolves and cold = stronger deer heard".

I don't understand what deer hunters have against wolves. They naturally cull the herd. I also find it funny hearing people complain about the harsh winter weather. There is not much we can change about the weather. This winter is doing nothing but shaping up to be a "NORMAL MINNESOTA WINTER".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...I would have to agree with BuckKiller's statements when he says "nature can take care of itself" and "IMO wolves and cold = stronger deer heard".

I don't understand what deer hunters have against wolves. ... This winter is doing nothing but shaping up to be a "NORMAL MINNESOTA WINTER".

I agree. We've been lucky the last few winters. This winter is NORMAL!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Really great colors there now and butterflies by the thousands. get there if you can. Headed over for 2 hours today. Heres a few pics. Pics from Munsinger
    • Plus+1 last weekend got into a good bite in about 31-35 feet and they were all full of Minnows.
    • @Tom Sawyer   Any idea what this is with the painted lady?  Only saw this one at Munsinger.  Really a beauty. 
    • Thanks Juneau.... Just an FYI to everyone - HH is my account
    • Interesting take on the Koivu Signing:   Perhaps most galling about all of this is Michael Russo of The Athletic tweets there is a no-move clause in Koivu’s extension. Why on earth would Fletcher agree to include a no-move clause in an aging player’s contract? It’s bad enough when you give a no-move clause to a productive player who suddenly hits the cliff but in Koivu’s case there was no reason to do this. Heck, there was no reason to give him any type of extension in the first place. He also was entering the final season of a seven-year, $47.25 million contract that will pay him $5.4 million in 2017-18. Allowing Koivu to play out that contract made perfect sense. If he had productive 2017-18, he might be brought back but there also was the potential that his money could have been used on a younger, more attractive talent. Koivu is coming off a productive 2016-17 season in part because he was able to move from first- to second-line center playing behind 32-year-old Eric Staal. Koivu had 18 goals and 58 points and was a plus-27 in 80 games, spending much of the season with Mikael Granlund and Jason Zucker on his wings. Like many Wild players, Koivu didn’t do much in the Wild’s five-game first-round playoff loss to the Blues. He had one goal, one assist and was a minus-1. All of this set up Koivu with the opportunity to return this season and prove he could remain a productive and durable player. When it came to Koivu’s contract, the Wild finally was in an ideal spot. That is no longer the case. Instead, the Wild has Koivu locked up for three more years and, thus, put themselves right back in the type of salary-cap situation they should be trying to escape.
    • Thats the way I ran mine.  One run of AC comes from the converter, and one run terminates in a male plug that goes into my inverter.  That outlet run is dead unless I am running it off my inverter but I just split the couple outlets I would need behind the TV and one other spot and it seems to be working flawlessly so far.  I can watch Dish TV without firing up the genny if I want.  Only time I would really do this is during a hot bite to minimize noise.  Outside of that, just let er run.
    • I guess we'll see in 8/9 months if he's worth $6 Million.....my point is they could have waited and resigned him in the off season for less...he never would have gotten that elsewhere...never...just leaving money on the table that could be spent more wisely elsewhere IMO.  Surpirsed he hasn't extended Parise/Suter for another 5 yrs at $9M/yr beyond the 10 he already signed them for   
    • I'm guessing that worms and crawlers wash into water systems after storms. So they are not totally foreign to being found in the water. Deep mudflats? Doubt it. But I do target storm sewer outlets on lakes shortly after rainfall with some success using natural colored rubber worms for bass. And have caught an occasional walleye while doing so.
    • Just relaxing and bobber fishing with the Mrs while camping up north 10 days ago, had decent sized suckers on. Had 8 suckers left for the evening bite. Found where some smallies seemed to be stacked. Two 18"ers, two 19"ers and what looked to be a 20" smallmouth that got off boat side.  A 23" walleye decided to get in on the fun, had a snip off and lost a fish in the weeds 25' feet down. Those were some productive minners. Bringing more next year. A nice double and my wife's new personal best bass. 19"
    • its same reason to cast frogs shallow back towards the shore late fall like they are jumping in the water. those walleyes know come fall thats what frogs do and are waiting to ambush them and makes for some great fishing.
  • Our Sponsors