Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
gunflint

AIM & CRR

6 posts in this topic

I just watched an interview with Keith Kavajecz on the new Pro walleye league AIM. It looks interesting. They have 3 events so far and are trying to get a 4th lined up for somewhere in Minnesota. The new weigh-in system will be CRR Catch, Record, and Release. He said that the advantages of the new weigh in system include less fish handling and the ability to fish all day then using your best 5 fish for the weigh in.

They will give the anglers (a pro with a co-angler) a measuring stick and a digital camera every day. Each fish will be CRRed and returned to the water. Sounds interesting. I wonder if this new weigh-in system works, will more tourneys go that route?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting. What channel / show did you see that on. I'd like to see it if they run it again. My first thought, which for me is usually wrong, is how many more doors are being opened up for dishonest tourny anglers (not that there are any). I'd like to know what kind of "anti-cheating" measures they've got built in.

I can think of a couple possible scenarios right away. I do like the CRR idea, esp. for warm water situations. Are you penalized for bringing in a dead / injured fish (guthooked).??

It may be for the best, but it takes away some of the hard decisions / strategy (keep mediocre fish early?? keep the last one, or go for something bigger, what size is gonna be your minimum.) I'm not complaining about that, just would be a different mindset going in. Looking forward to see how AIM does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keith and Gary Parsons have a web site that has the interview. Policy prevents me from mentioning it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at what the unmotorized tournament circuit is doing for their CPR tournaments. Esentially they provide you a ruler, and sometimes a camera. Your job is to take a picture of your fish on the ruler, then let it go. You then turn in your SD card at the end of the day.

Seems to work for them, and they have a lot less sophistication than these pro walleye guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the try to prevent treating is by having the co-angler in the boat monitoring that the pro isn't taking a picture of the same fish several times and is measuring accurately. In the past the co-anglers were also competing for money. With CRR the co-anglers can only win prizes from a drawing, so they are not competing and wouldn't be inclined to cheat to help themselves in the standings. This was important to take the co-anglers out of the competition so there wouldn't be cheating with measurements, etc. The way that AIM looked at it was that your finish as a co angler has traditionally been determined by what pros you draw and if they are on fish, the finish of the co-angler didn't really measure the skill of the co-angler. So they determined that having a drawing for prizes would suffice.

I'm looking forward to this new system and hope to possibly fish a MN or WI event as a co-angler.

Dan Jochum

NPAA #269

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors