Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Catmendo

Extender???

9 posts in this topic

I would like to hear from some of you more experienced guys on Canon's Extender's. My main question is this. Will my 100-400mm retain its ability to remain sharp when using an extender???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sharpness will fall off about 10-20% in my experience with the 1.4 on the 100-400. You will also lose auto focus as well as some contrast and it adds some CA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What will happen with the 100-400 is its ability to focus. On any non 1 series camera you will lose auto focus capability above an aperture of f5.6. So when you add the 1.4 or 2x converter your aperture will exceed that.

There is a procedure to tape pins on the converter to stop the lens from reporting aperture so you can retain auto focus. This is hap-hazard at best. I was able to get it to work on occasion when I owned that lens but the auto focus speed slowed down way to much to be useful.

Kenko converters have been said to work with this combo but the loss of IQ and focus speed make this a last resort attempt at longer reach in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but the auto focus speed slowed down way to much to be useful.

The Af speed has to be faster than someone like me attempting to manual focus. grin I have the Kenko 1.4 and have used it just once, to try it out. I should just sell it. I always forget I even have it in my bag. I grew up with manual focus cameras and lenses. Unfortunately, I got older. wink It takes me much more time and is a lot tougher to get a sharp photo, if I can't rely on AF. Here is one of a few shots I took with the Kenko on my 100-400. I think it's sharp enough, but the coloring in the stomach, seems a bit weird. This bugger was quite aways from me.

3122555083_ab5b5a9ffd_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, autofocusing aside, in very good light with a subject close to you that requires little or no cropping, the IQ is still good. Add either less than optimal light or a distant subject and it falls off too much.

I used the Kenko 1.4 and the Canon 1.4 on the 100-400 and, like X-T, eventually forgot they were in the bag and relied on woodscraft to get closer to the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinkin of gettin one of these with my Cabela's credit card bucks. Anybody here got one?

3123154409_0d361106a3_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinkin of gettin one of these with my Cabela's credit card bucks. Anybody here got one?

I've been tempted. I'd like to see one in person, so to speak, to find out if you can see anything coming from the side of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great commentary gents and good sound advice! In the future, as I continue to evolve along in the world of photography, I will now begin to plan a strategy for a budget that will be geared towards the purchase of a lens with more reach. Like most of you, I would love to go out and purchase something in the neighbourhood of a 600mm. So with that said, that's what I will set my sights on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, you might think in terms of the 500 instead. It's 8 pounds instead of the 12 pounds of the 600, with nearly as much reach, and it resolves more sharply than your 100-400. Even strong guys have trouble handholding the 600, so it's pretty much always a monopod or tripod deal, and that can get cumbersome. I can handhold the 500 for up to a minute or two at a time with no trouble. I can't say the same for the times I've shot the 600.

Just some more food for thought.

Also, any of the Canon telephoto prime lenses can take the 1.4 TC without the loss of image quality you get on the 100-400/TC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I have nothing good to say about his presidency
    • So they called Reilly back up, but part of me is kind of hoping that Prosser plays. Earlier this year he was very solid. You never get elite level from him, but I think he was dependable out there and I have been a big critic of his for a long time. The ceiling is obviously higher for Reilly and I want him to be a regular at some point, but if he isn't going to get 10 mins a night he is better off in Iowa and play Prosser. What impresses me are these numbers: 141 goals for (Tied 4th), 96 goals against (tied #2), +45 differential (#2). When was the last time a Wild team was in the top 5 in goals scored? We have a very balanced team and it is fun to watch, which this balance is also why slumps by Parise and Pominville don't kill this team or at least haven't until this point. I will say it again, I was a huge proponent of signing Staal. NO, I didn't think he was going to be leading our team in scoring, but what I was excited about was that it would mean that Coyle/Granlund could play wing where they should be. Those two are playing great overall and both have been playing wing pretty much entire season thus far. We can also thank Gravovac for his role too because without him, one of the two would be playing center most likely.
    • I didn't get nearly as much done as I wanted, but I was able to take my new fish house out on the ice last weekend.  Fishing was slow for most of the weekend, but we had a good time otherwise.   I have some of the lights and tv mounted up temporarily till I start putting up the carsiding.  I'm just a little nervous about starting on the carsiding until I know exactly how to do my lift bunks.  I'd hate to put all that up and realize I don't have my furring in the right spot.   Furnace ducts are also ran temporarily, they'll be covered by cabinets when it's all said and done.  Most of the day saturday we didn't need the furnace anyways.  The sun kept it 10 degrees higher than what we set the furnace at!   Right now she's nothing pretty, but she got the job done without any problems on her initial trip.
    • Cooter ol' pal,  I think maybe you tend to skip over your inherent decency when you refer to President Obama as " a POS" My guess is you actually have a little more respect than that for a man to did the heavy lifting for the US for eight years and,  on more than one occasion,   has proven he is a decent man who really cares about the issues we face. You can disagree of course with some things-or all things for that matter-the man has done but he DOES deserve your respect. He is definitely not,  as you put it "a POS" and I'd guess you really have more class than that.
  • Our Sponsors