Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mnfathead

Collapsable fish houses????

13 posts in this topic

Wondering if anyone has info on the fold down fishhouses like the Eskimo 3 Quick fish or the Clam Base camp. The fold down houses with no floor, super light weight. Are they worth the money or are they junk? Any info would be great thanks, my sister is looking for a xmas gift for her husband and looking at these as they have a Jeep so not alot of room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are worth the money. BigWade bought the Base Camp and we used it last weekend. Awesome house, especially for early and late ice. I would get a small otter sled to pull all your stuff still, but it's nice, roomy and warm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wondering if anyone has info on the fold down fishhouses like the Eskimo 3 Quick fish or the Clam Base camp. The fold down houses with no floor, super light weight. Are they worth the money or are they junk? Any info would be great thanks, my sister is looking for a xmas gift for her husband and looking at these as they have a Jeep so not alot of room.

I picked up an otter lodge in the off season but also got a vehicle that was smaller and no trailer so my options were limited. I was at the ice show and I was looking at both the Clam Base camp and Eskimo 3, I went with the Clam Base Camp as I felt (IMO) that the material was heavier, but the pole system appeared to be the same.

I used it last weekend for the 1st time. I used the shoulder straps and carried it out as we walked out and didn't get weighted down by it, supper light.

Right out of the box (no assembly needed) set up was done in 5 min and plenty of room and solid once I figured out that it needs to be staked down properly in any wind. The stakes provided screw in very easy and hold extremely well. I had myself and Sandmannd in there with our gear and had plenty of room (and we are not small guys).

I would vote for either one but this is just my opinion on the Clam Base Camp! Good luck and I have a Jeep as well and it fits in there, heck it fits in the trunk of my focus too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a QF3. seems to be built well. Mine also toom me 5 minutes the first time to set up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the difference between the floor less fish houses and the ameristep ground blinds used for deer hunting?

Are the ice screw stakes sold separately?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can buy the ice stakes from Clam's HSOforum. I would imagine there are other places to purchase as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the difference between the floor less fish houses and the ameristep ground blinds used for deer hunting?

Are the ice screw stakes sold separately?

I don't think the blinds have windows other than screens do they? IF they do, no reason you couldn't use one. Probably lighter material though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the difference between the floor less fish houses and the ameristep ground blinds used for deer hunting?

Are the ice screw stakes sold separately?

I often use my ground blind for fishing on nicer days. The drawback is that it's very light material with no insulation at all, other than maybe a black interior. It keeps the wind off you, but that's about it. And there are no windows, other than screens. It's better than nothing. It's lightweight, cheap, and on nice days, it works out pretty well. To anchor it, use a cordless drill to put in some pilot holes at the corners, and use screw-in tree steps.

Also, remember to put your DNR number on it somewhere. I have it laminated, and just pin it in place with safety pins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use to use one all the time they work great. I used my auger to hold it down. Mine had zip up windows on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have three Otter Cabins. They are the perfect size for two guys or you and a couple kids. The best part is you can load and unload it by yourself. The New Clam is a nice house but when they say it's a two man or a three man house, they mean that's how many people it takes to load it in the back of a truck. I have one of the original Otter Cabins and I have two of their brand new ones. All I can say is they take a beating! No other brand has one as light and durable. Oh and the canvas on the new ones is incredible. I was out the other day -15deg and the windows and canvas were extremely pliable. This doesn’t sound like a big deal but so many people with other brands have cracked windows and/or are too hard to set up if it’s really cold out. Just something to keep in mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to ice fishing (more accurately I've not ice fished in a long time and am getting back into it). I looked at A LOT of houses at the ice fishing show - came a way a bit overwhelmed. I looked closely at the clam and the Eskimo QF 3 - I decided on the QF. No specific reason - I thought the material of both felt similer, poles seamed similar, ice screws I thought the QF seamed better. The main reason I went with the QF is the windows are velcro'd in. Having looked at many used ones (not necessarily the same style) I know it is a fact that the windows will crack when it is cold. Because they are velcro'd in all I need to do is pull it off and get a replacement from Eskimo. Not a huge deal - just seemed like a nice well thought-out detail. Set-up is easy, had it out this past Sunday morning - 12 below and buddy heater kept it warm enough to be able to take off my coat. One recommendation - practice taking it down before you get on the lake. We had a nice layer of frost going on the inside and the material got stiff making it somewhat hard to put back together. Because I had practiced beforehand I managed to get it put away with minimal cuss words being said smile. Good luck in your purchase - Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have one. I fount that if you push all the sides in And do the top last it fold easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disregard my earlier comments I thought you were talking about the flip over Eskimos. My bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Dave, if this many folks are not understanding the question, than maybe the question is unclear.  So rather then rant about it perhaps try rephrasing it.
    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
  • Our Sponsors