Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Quetico

Effects of the econmy on pets?

12 posts in this topic

Ok am I the only who has notice an extremely high number of stray cats lately? It seems like there are 3 or 4 different tagless collarless strays in my yard every day.

Is the economy so bad where people are just throwing their cats out and letting them go? If thats the case take your pets to the shelters. If I could get close to any of these animals, I'd drop them off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I am far from Eagan, but there have always been a huge amount of "ditch panthers" down near my place. I try to take care of them any time I have a gun in my hand.

It seems that ferrel cats do very well hunting and killing on their own, and are very hard on game and song bird populations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on the radio today that people are letting their horses go because of the economy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read that in the paper as well. The article said something about some of the owners who got caught claiming they had to make a choice between feeding their kids or the horses. Part of the problem as we discussed at the training table one morning is there is no longer any horse slaughter here in the US. There is in Mexico and Canada I believe and there has been talk of some starting on one or more of the Indian reservations in SD, but as of right now, none on US soil. However, turning something like a horse loose is not only unfair to the horse it's downright dangerous. And while I understand the problem if there has been a loss of income or some other hardship, if you look hard enough there is usually someone who will take a free horse if it's not already on it's way to the glue factory. Sounds like some people taking the easy way out before exhausting all the alternatives. Not a lawyer but would seem if the horse one turned loose was involved in an accident with an automobile where human injuries or fatalities resulted and you were proven to be the owner of the horse, the hardship you're facing might've only begun when you turned it loose. Jackpine, Lawdog or any other legal types have an opinion on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree in principle with you Dotch, but the reality would probably be somewhat different.

If someone has fallen on such hard times that they let their critters roam freely, and then someone hits one of those critters leading to death or maiming, not much would happen. The problem here is that we're probably not talking about a criminal matter - but a civil matter.

If you're poor, no one usually bothers to sue. Like beating a dead horse, there's not much to be gained by suing someone who doesn't have much.

That said, there are almost always alternatives to leaving a domesticated critter out to fend for itself. Its just plain wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah once animals become dependent on people for food its tough to get them to fend for themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone has fallen on such hard times that they let their critters roam freely, and then someone hits one of those critters leading to death or maiming, not much would happen. The problem here is that we're probably not talking about a criminal matter - but a civil matter.

If your pet, horse, cow, ect. runs into the street and causes an accident, you most definitely can be sued for damages and injuries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only is there no longer horse slaughter in the US, but it may become a federal offense to transport a horse to Mexico or Canada with the intent of sending that animal to slaughter.

There are animal shelters and rescue organizations who are full because the families cannot take care of their pets anymore. The dogs and cats are the first to go when it comes to getting rid of "things".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

feral cats are a problem because someone lets one of them go.... and they start reproducing and all the sudden there are 10 cats running around. When I used to live In Wyoming, I would shoot them on sight. Here in the north metro that is a little trickier to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same goes for dogs my dad just took in A yellow lab some as---le left on the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking at some humane society websites, looking to adopt another dog at some point. The cost to adopt a pet in Sioux Falls runs about $200. I could buy a puppy from a breeder around here for about the same, sometimes less.

To me, the high price of the adoption would deter someone from going to the humane society to get their next dog.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Check out the 2017 Obsession Hurcan 366fps and 3.9 lbs!
    •   When someone gets to the personal aspect, whether it's me or someone else, I will challenge them and if they can justify what they have said about an individual --OK -- otherwise show me why, and if it is just their opinion say so. I'll accept that if it's their opinion.   There is nothing generic about an insult, an insult is an insult. What do you consider as a douchebag?
    • Not sure why people get so worked up about being called dummies, poopyheads and sons of bees.  Whatever, its generic insults and this is the internet.   But yeah, there's a line somewhere in the there that separates the real douchebags* from the rest of us.  You know it when you see it.   *Sorry if any douchebags felt personally attacked by being called douchebags.
    • I was addressing it to JigSawJimmy Peatmoss  response : That's an opinion, not anything more , so I let it go.
    • Created/Saved all these jobs, cut gajillions off AF1 costs, etc.  Ok, so how did the that work?  Usually these sort of dealings aren't totally one sided.  At least the carrier deal had a bunch of Pence fingerprints on tax incentives Trump took credit for.   I have doubts that King Cheeto just shows up and blows a bunch of smoke up assses and corporate executives are just like, "Yay!"   Is Trump's Twitter bully pulpit that powerful?  He randomly yells at Boeing and they just fold over for him?  I thought we realized Trump on Twitter is only for the LOLs.
    • Well hope the Trump supporters are having fun, seems those days are numbered. Turns out you can't just yell fake news at real news and make it go away. The Feds are closing in, and at best it seems Trump thinks throwing Manafort to the wolves might get them off his tail. Anywho, lots of news today.   The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign   McCain: Congress doesn't have 'credibility' to handle Russia probes    Because this happened - House Intelligence chair discloses classified intel in clumsy effort to validate Trump   Also this earlier in the day -  Former campaign manager Paul Manafort secretly worked for a Russian billionaire with a plan to "greatly benefit the Putin Government."     And in completely unrelated news - remember those Carrier jobs you bragged about Trump saving? Yeah, those jobs are gone. Carrier pocketed the tax breaks then screwed the workers anyway. Great negotiation there. http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/job-cuts-endure-at-indiana-factories-despite-trump-pressure-416511193.html
    •   Who are you addressing this to? I did not make the statement only re-posted it. I also don't find PEATMOSS's comment very humorous as well.   PEATMOSS said: This is still, by far, the funniest thing I have ever read on these threads in a decade.
    •   Anything you post on here from now on has no merit or credibility as far as I'm  concerned.  I wasn't even going to respond to this, but feel what you posted needed to be. If you wish to call my mother a dam, you will, the same as you called another persons mother that. I don't give a rats butt what your political views are, however when you start getting into personal attacks you had better look in a mirror. You don't probably don't know anyone on here personally, yet you attack someone on a personal bases, call there mother a dam and ridicule them because they had a lower portion of a leg amputated due to something they can control, but had no control whether they have the illness and sometime that illness makes you pay a price. BD2 has that illness he can control to a certain extent where he can lead a normal life, however there will be complications and from what I know of him he will accept that. I don't know DB2 personally, I've never met him, I've debated against some thing on this where he and I have had different views, I respect his opinions even though I disagree on many, BUT I SURE AS H--- DON"T ATTACK HIS ANCESTORY OR  ANY TYPE OF DISABILLITY
    • Yea yea all ya auld pharts would  pass out the minute she popped the first button!!
    • Would he get a free hoodie for his efforts?
  • Our Sponsors