Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
aquafang

Target separation on flashers

30 posts in this topic

Can someone set the record straight on flashers please? Who has the best target separation. and whats the deal with power? Vexilar claims that power is just a gimmick. I'm mainly talking Vex, marcum, and hummingbird.

thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have verified my LX-5 at under 1" in SFL/Zoom. My old FL-8 and 18 came in at around 2"+ or -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically the Vex/ Hummungbirds come in a shade over two inches while the Marcum LX-5 when zoomed in will hit the ¾” mark…now that is precision. When researching flashers make sure to note the distinction between target separation and “Target ID” (spacing on screen) two very different features, you want the target separation.

Hi everyone, I'm Eddie, a technical specialist with the Marketing department from Humminbird... We advertise a target seperation of 2 1/2".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"When you bounce a ball off the old garage door if you throw it soft or lob it in what happens? It bounces back at all sorts of trajectories and angles. Basically the lack of power can cause an inconsistency or cause the ball to behave erratically, sonar in sense works off of the same principle. Now throw that ball full power at the wall. It is going to came back at you straight and quick, hence more accurately and consistently."

Sound waves in water behave nothing like a ball in air. Gravity doesn't affect sound waves and the sound waves always travel at the same speed. You need enough power to get a usable echo return from whatever you want to see, like a jig or a fish, in the depth of water you are fishing in.

The quality of the transducer and the receiving circuits makes a difference as well.

There really isn't a downside to having more power except possibly cost. But other things might be more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need enough power to get a usable echo return from whatever you want to see, like a jig or a fish, in the depth of water you are fishing in.

Basically the same principle I tried to explain in layman’s terms, more power makes for better signal.

But thank you for your input and keeping me in check. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone prove scientifically which is true. Is more power better or is it just a marketing ploy? PROOF!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The showdown has target seperation down to 1/2" it seperates your treble on a jigging spoon at 20+ feet of water

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That I would have to see. I thing that really gets me is when claims are made. "you can a walleye laying on the bottom". give me a break. Take a 6" minnow put it on a jig, now drop it down in 15ft or more. That puppy will not be seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can pick up my jig AND my split shot sinker 4 inches above the jig on my MarCum LX2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That I would have to see. I thing that really gets me is when claims are made. "you can a walleye laying on the bottom". give me a break. Take a 6" minnow put it on a jig, now drop it down in 15ft or more. That puppy will not be seen.

Huh? So a 6 inch or smaller fish cant be detected in water deeper than 15 ft.?

Umm ok.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see my minnow on my spoon on the LX 5 and have seen that second band disappear when a fish stole it -_-. My rod was laying down. This was in about 20ft of water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see my minnow and splitshot in over 20 FOW with my FL18 no problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what jigginjim meant is that you won't be able to see that jig sitting on the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If its laying on the bottom there is nothing to seprate at that time..... not to hard to figure out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you have to ask yourself will it make a difference if the fish is .5'', 1'' or even 3'' away from your presentation. If you are able to get the fish to strike it will not matter; it will also not matter if you don't get the fish to strike. Either why you have learned what you needed to know, and that is if the presentation you are using is working. If you are looking from the smallest separation distance get a underwater camera and the issue is over you will know exactly how far something is away from you presentation.

For those that will say the camera will not work in the dark or in murky water, all i have to say is I am sorry there is no hope for you. If you still need something better then electronics or a camera I suggest you change you fishing location, try the grocery store, you will be able to tell the exact how far the fish is from you lure since you will be hold both. The later would be only logical next step for ice fishing.

The new and improved tech that they are coming out with each year is just a way for individuals to see who's is longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone explain target separation and target ID. I'm pretty sure I know what they are, but would like a definition. Now, who is better here? both in zoom and no zoom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with all this being said, since Im in the market for my first flasher....

I had my eye on a XV-1 which has 600 watts peak power but for a few dollars more I can get the VX-1P which has 1000 watts peak power.

should I be spending a few extra dollars to get a more powerful unit? My O.L. already told me to buy one, buy good and not to waste my money on something I wont be happy with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HEADS UP Shizzy...Cabela's has the new VX-1P on sale now for $279 (was $349) to beat Ganders $199 deal. That is stupid cheap...like below cost...seen it on there web site last night...it is crazy...go nuts bud? wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you have to ask yourself will it make a difference if the fish is .5'', 1'' or even 3'' away from your presentation. If you are able to get the fish to strike it will not matter; it will also not matter if you don't get the fish to strike. Either why you have learned what you needed to know, and that is if the presentation you are using is working. If you are looking from the smallest separation distance get a underwater camera and the issue is over you will know exactly how far something is away from you presentation.

For those that will say the camera will not work in the dark or in murky water, all i have to say is I am sorry there is no hope for you. If you still need something better then electronics or a camera I suggest you change you fishing location, try the grocery store, you will be able to tell the exact how far the fish is from you lure since you will be hold both. The later would be only logical next step for ice fishing.

The new and improved tech that they are coming out with each year is just a way for individuals to see who's is longer.

I agree for the most part, but there is one scenario where target separation is all about. That's a school of fish and being able to distinguish one that's larger from one that's smaller. Now you have to get your lure to the correct fish and when your flasher is registering a false bottom with soooooo many fish, it gets a lot harder to separate what is what. It's really easy to lose your lure in a solid band of three/four feet column of fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ran into a scenario this weekend where target seperation helped a lot.

Right at sundown the water column filled with plankton. As the plankton got thicker it became more difficult to find your bait and the fish amongst the plankton.

So basically the LX-5 was showing all the plankton as single individual yellow blips (nearly the entire screen was full). I would identify my bait by jigging it. Then lower it through the plankton until a red mark appeared and then work that fish. It was pretty cool being able to do that.

I can't say for certain because I didn't have anything to test, but I think anything else with lower power might have just picked up the plankton as one big blob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a fl 18 fishing in 15 feet of water when i have it in zoom it will seperate the 2 parts of a ice number 10 ant this is when I have my gain set on 1. i have used markums but sorry but I was not any more impressed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HEADS UP Shizzy...Cabela's has the new VX-1P on sale now for $279 (was $349) to beat Ganders $199 deal. That is stupid cheap...like below cost...seen it on there web site last night...it is crazy...go nuts bud? wink

For an extra $80, I'd go with the Marcum VX-1P. You get not only the extra 400 watts but, six more IR settings and the soft case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also use a fl-18 and never ran into a seperation problem. when there is lots of floaty stuff in the water I just use the low power setting and it works better than ever. sometimes less is MORE. and in this instance its very true. I dont need to see the plankton just the fish so I just " delete it" with the LP mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have had to experience the millions, well maybe hundreds of yellow blips that showed up. Happened to be either a passing school of minnow or water bugs, then followed by feeding predators. Very rare opportunity that one can figure out a fish from among a 10 feet column of blips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • i've never done the plastic thing. but i've taken Reb's advice on planting grass, in particular filling in spots and its turned out great. so this is going to really hurt to say this, but Reb really knows what he's talking about when it comes to his lawn. i've also seen pictures.
    •   Right next to the river, no less.  Isn't anyone from the EPA concerned about this?    
    • The "if you were watching the story" was referring to the actions of VW.   Your link about mercedes was full of weasel words and little actual hard information.     And from the link you posted...   Seems like no evidence they did anything wrong has surfaced yet.   Maybe, maybe not.   So, what facts are you referring to?   And are you disputing the stuff about BMW and VW as well?     Oh, and from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal    
    • Repairs and fixes for 2.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI models:   There are three generations of the 2.0-liter turbo-diesel four-cylinder, and all will require different fixes (from simple software updates to complete, and potentially performance-crippling, hardware retrofits). As of January 6, 2017, Volkswagen announced a complete fix for 2015 TDI models with the third-generation engine. This will involve installing a second NOx sensor and a new or replacement diesel-oxidation catalyst. In March 2017, VW received approval to sell these cars, of which there are approximately 12,000 new and 67,000 used. On May 19, 2017, VW received approval to repair 2012–2014 Passat TDI models. A total of 84,391 cars are included, except those with manual transmissions; CARB said VW had not shown sufficient evidence that they will be made compliant. VW is awaiting approval to resell these vehicles as used cars. Buybacks and compensation for 3.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI and Porsche diesel models:

      As of December 21, 2016, Volkswagen reached a second settlement with the roughly 78,000 owners and lessees of 3.0-liter diesel models. In late January 2017, Volkswagen announced a $1.2 billion program that differs substantially from the $10 billion program for 2.0-liter diesel models. Judge Breyer approved the final settlement amount on May 11, 2017. Currently, only owners of 2009–2012 Audi Q7 and Volkswagen Touareg models with the Generation 1 engine are eligible for buybacks between $24,755 to $57,157. This is because Volkswagen cannot repair them to be emissions compliant. Generation 1 lessees of 2012 vehicles can receive between $5001 and $6615 for terminating their leases early. Generation 1 owners who do not sell their cars back to Volkswagen can receive $7755 to $13,880. For complete details, see the court’s handy executive summary. For Generation 2 models between 2013–2016, Volkswagen will offer cash compensation ranging from $7039 to $16,114; if the recall isn’t made “timely available,” the automaker will buy them back for prices between $43,153 to $99,862 and extend any warranties that might expire until the recall is ready. Generation 2 lessees can receive between $5677 and $12,492 for terminating their leases early. If lessees decide to keep their cars and perform the fix, they each receive a flat $2000. In all cases with Generation 2 cars, owners and lessees can opt to receive half of the cash payments up front and the other half once the vehicle is repaired. Generation 2 owners and lessees are also eligible to receive up to $1500 each as part of a separate $327.5 million settlement with Bosch, the supplier of the emissions software. Details are available here. These prices have been set using NADA Used Car Guide Clean Retail values as of November 2015 and adjusted for options, mileage, and the region the vehicle was registered in as of that month. The 2016 diesel models will be repurchased at 12.9 percent above prices for equivalent 2015 models. Owners and lessees will also be reimbursed for state and local taxes. The registration deadline is December 31, 2019. Owners and lessees will get the same payment (adjusted for mileage) regardless of when they register. Repairs and fixes for 3.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi TDI and Porsche diesel models:   There are two versions of the 3.0-liter turbo-diesel V-6 that require different modifications. The Generation 1 engines in the 2009–2012 Audi Q7 and Volkswagen Touareg cannot be made fully compliant with EPA regulations. Generation 2 engines in 2013–2016 models can be fixed under a formal recall that must be approved by the EPA and CARB no later than December 20, 2017, or else Volkswagen must pay owners an additional penalty. On those 58,000 models, Audi said on November 23, 2015, that it would update the software and “resubmit” its emissions applications after the EPA found undocumented “auxiliary emission control devices” that were allowing excessive levels of NOx.
    • I would guess it is going to create more pollution rounding up, transporting, scrapping and reclaiming those cars than the excess they would have emitted in their lifespan vs the cars that replace them. 
    • So, first you tell me " if you were watching the story closely" then when I posted a link supporting what I said to be fact, your response was that your memory is bad and you were making a hypothesis. Classic. 
    • they will all probably end up scrapped then. you can probably expect the junkyards to soon be filled with Volkswagens that will be missing the ECU, DPF, and have holes in their engines.   cash for clunkers 2.0?
    •     This is very earth friendly, and good tree huggers and bureaucrats everywhere love it...
    • I would like to get some recipes to inject a turkey breast, and appx. how long does it take to smoke it? And whats a good wood to use ?
    • Could be that others cheated also.   I was relying on memory about the BMW connection and hypothesized that Mercedes would also have been a possibility.   I did say "maybe mercedes".     In any case, VW cheated on emissions for many years with the assent of the highest levels of management.     Apparently making a small diesel that runs ok and doesn't make too much pollution at an acceptable cost is really hard.
  • Our Sponsors