Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Steve Foss

Stolen photos

16 posts in this topic

Here's a link to an online photo gallery that contains many stolen photos. The photos stolen are mostly bird and animal images, and I know several of you on this board have your own Web sites or online galleries.

In the cases of the stolen photos, the person has cropped to trim off the copyright symbols and photographers' names.

You can comment on each photo, and there's also a button to click when you enter a gallery to report abuse to the gallery hosting site. I know of four other photographers so far whose work has been stolen and who are starting to leave comments and reporting abuse in that gallery.

It's not just the galleries that show birds and animals on the thumbnail for the gallery, but the seasonal galleries also have a lot of nature images.

You might take a gallop through and see if you recognize any of your own work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked the sight Steve....I didn't see any of mine there....thanks for the heads up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just clicked on the link, there were no images found. Maybe the user deleted all the photos?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like she is reloading photos, hopefully just the ones she took this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting to see what goes back up. Assuming everything that gets put back is her own work, then everything that's left off was other people's work. It'd be funny if she doesn't put up any nature photos at all. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a number of really nice shots originally, her's don't really look like tham at all wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know four of the photographers whose images she pirated, and they are talented photogs. All four issued protests to "Myra" and Picasa. I hope one or more actually files a copyright infringement suit. There won't be much money in it, but such lessons need to be taught and learned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Steve, let her have it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked through there and didn't see any of mine, but I wouldn't hesitate to go after somebody who did something that schtoopid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the fact that she (if Myra really is even her name) cropped out the photographers' names and copyright symbols was to me plain evidence she knew what she was doing was wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone pirated a photo from my Webshots album. The strange thing was the pirated photo was poor, before I knew what I was doing, ( still don't, but have improved since then). I have much better photos out there and could not figure out why a lousy image to be pirated. Must have been sentimental reasons.

I never understood stealing other's photos and claiming as their own. Where's the pride in this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it against the law to have someone elses photograph in a webgallery if you are not using it for monetary gain or anything like that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it against the law to have someone elses photograph in a webgallery if you are not using it for monetary gain or anything like that?

US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 106: " The owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (...) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work." The U.S. law permits copying of images or text for "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research."

My understanding is posting someone else's images in their own gallery would be a violation of copyright law unless it was used for one of the above purposes. This usually only applies to newspapers using a photo from a gallery in a newspaper article. If you are using a persons photos without permission you can be sued for copyright infrigement. In my eyes that would include an on line gallery.

More importantly posting other's photos in your gallery would normally be a violation of the hosting service itself. That is why it pays to read the terms of service when you sign up. Keep in mind I'm not a lawyer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • 9" gill, cpr'ed.  Not bad for a metro lake.
    • The Russians have released this photo of Trump in a Moscow hotel with a hooker.     I take it all back, fella's ..   You where right !        
    • I No problem with that either will do that I can get around 400" of ice per 4ah battery. Eat your cake!
    • Proving these investments sat on the table waiting for a business friendly environment.   Which obama administration has been anything but.. (friendly)  
    • Waiting for some of your mathematical calculations showing how the national debt won't be a problem, given the projected path of the debt and interest rates.    
    • New ABC / WaPo Poll Shows Drop In Trump Favorability Courtesy Of Aggressive "Oversamples" Jan 17, 2017 3:42 PM   In the month leading up to the election on November 8th, we repeatedly demonstrated how the mainstream media polls from the likes of ABC/Washington Post, CNN and Reuters repeatedly manipulated their poll samples to engineer their desired results, namely a large Hillary Clinton lead (see "New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through 'Oversamples'" and "ABC/Wapo Effectively Admit To Poll Tampering As Hillary's "Lead" Shrinks To 2-Points").  In fact, just 16 days prior to the election an ABC/Wapo poll showed a 12-point lead for Hillary, a result that obviously turned out to be embarrassingly wrong for the pollsters. But, proving they still got it, ABC/Washington Post and CNN are out with a pair of polls on Trump's favorability this morning that sport some of the most egregious "oversamples" we've seen.  The ABC/Wapo poll showed an 8-point sampling margin for Democrats with only 23% of the results taken from Republicans...   ...while the CNN poll showed a similar 8-point advantage for Democrats with only 24% of respondents identifying as Republicans.      
    • Commutes manning sentence - for providing wikileaks information.   Punishes the "russians" - for providing wikileaks information.   Maybe the lib-tards will wake up and smell the coffee.   See that they are being played like a violin...   https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T12&msg=Time left until Obama leaves office    
    • If you believe it is a moral consideration that is one thing.  You have your beliefs.     If you contend that it is a practical reason, then facts are required.   Totally different. I thought you were making a fact based practical point.  
    • You see the sharp tail grouse there I heard there is some but never seen them
  • Our Sponsors