Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

Testing 2x Converter

6 posts in this topic

It is too windy to do much shooting today,but I wanted to try my 2x to see how much image degradation there really was.

Alot of people on other forums say it makes images "un-useable" ?? I don't think it's that bad. There is a hint of CA and a small loss of sharpness,but I didn't process these any different than I do any of my other images and I could still print them large. I did notice I needed to keep the shutter speed up to keep them sharp,but this is acceptable quality to me for times when I can't carry the big glass with me. I don't think it performs alot worse than my 100-400L did.

Anyone else have exp. with the 2x?

These were with my 30D,70-200 2.8L,Canon 2xII TC

Not good compositions,but I was just out for answers. I didn't stop it down,these are at F5.6

High class Sparrow

3105303500_8497a67631.jpg

3104471679_9654dcace1.jpg

Pa

3104472119_92effacde7.jpg

And Ma

3105317432_42e6bf29b7.jpg

A little croppage on above

3105303696_4e09f46667.jpg

I guess no matter what they say in forums,try it yourself before you make a decision. I am happy to have the ability to go to a 140-400mm F5.6 with IS in a compact package!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, definitely unusable. grin I don't see anything wrong with these shots at all. They look plenty sharp to me. I agree that you have to test things out yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On good quality lenses like you have I wouldn't be real concerned about using a 2X. As you can see it does a very credible job. You lose two stops of light, and some focus speed.

I do know a couple of publication shooters that do not use 1.4 or 2X converters because the publications won't accept them. Most of us don't fall into that category.

I use my 1.4 all the time on both the 70-200/2.8 and the 300/2.8. Works a touch better on the 300 than the 70-200.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to add is that on closeup subjects like yours the IQ is much better than on smaller distant subjects. The 2X just won't allow those distant shots to resolve very well.

And "unusable" is an individual assessment that will vary widely from user to user.

Another point to make is that pixel peeping or looking at how sharp they appear on the computer screen has limited value. If the prints are sharp enough to suit you using the 2X, you are good to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Another point to make is that pixel peeping or looking at how sharp they appear on the computer screen has limited value. If the prints are sharp enough to suit you using the 2X, you are good to go.

BINGO!!! I second that motion! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed as well. I've seldom used my 2X although I did give it a good workout on my 70-200 at a college football game before I got my 300mm. Had good light with an afternoon game and the results were fabulous. Actually got into that same discussion today and the conclusion was the same - for subjects taken at a fairly close distance, IQ suffers very little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • i believe it is their first year, one of the guys used to work for Ice Castle at the Pine River plant.  They have videos on you tube.  I have seen them on Facebook and you tube, the house looks nice, but it is not something I would buy. 
    • There sure isn't any rhyme or reason to the costs. I think you stand a lot better chance for a good price in the summer though when you can take your house to a job site and they don't have set up and clean up costs involved. 
    • If you use the vinyl kind it coils horribly and if you use the braided types your trebles get stuck in it. I'm not smart enough to do it but I wish some company could figure it out.  
    • So you are saying we all should have voted for a corrupt Clinton over the other candidates? Or should we go back and forth and point out the failings of Democratic states and go round and round? I voted for Johnson, both parties are useless to me but if you want to put on a blindfold and cry about the other party you go right ahead. It's obvious you can't look at any issue without those tinted political glasses on, I'm sure JV would be happy to fire up a tax based argument based on political leanings.
    • Ahhh. Another shiatty weekend for putzbutton.   "We talked about sore winners in the earlier segment. We really didn’t lose. This was sort of a successful failure,” radio host Mark Thompson said on MSNBC Saturday.   "A successful failure"   See !!   There is a silver lining for you libbers...      
    • Sounds reasonable.  We were just under that at a guy up north west of the metro and we had a 16 footer.  Called about 10-15 places and that was the low side of average.  
    • the guy that smoked it is a pro so I would think he did all the precautions needed. I will see him again this summer and ask him.  
    • Didn't catch the game last night but Parise hasn't looked like himself for sure. With some of the younger guys stepping up and Staal it hasn't hurt us nearly as bad as past years but it would sure be nice to see him get healthy. You kind of knew his contract was going to hurt at some point, hopefully it doesn't start this soon.
  • Our Sponsors