Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

Testing 2x Converter

6 posts in this topic

It is too windy to do much shooting today,but I wanted to try my 2x to see how much image degradation there really was.

Alot of people on other forums say it makes images "un-useable" ?? I don't think it's that bad. There is a hint of CA and a small loss of sharpness,but I didn't process these any different than I do any of my other images and I could still print them large. I did notice I needed to keep the shutter speed up to keep them sharp,but this is acceptable quality to me for times when I can't carry the big glass with me. I don't think it performs alot worse than my 100-400L did.

Anyone else have exp. with the 2x?

These were with my 30D,70-200 2.8L,Canon 2xII TC

Not good compositions,but I was just out for answers. I didn't stop it down,these are at F5.6

High class Sparrow

3105303500_8497a67631.jpg

3104471679_9654dcace1.jpg

Pa

3104472119_92effacde7.jpg

And Ma

3105317432_42e6bf29b7.jpg

A little croppage on above

3105303696_4e09f46667.jpg

I guess no matter what they say in forums,try it yourself before you make a decision. I am happy to have the ability to go to a 140-400mm F5.6 with IS in a compact package!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, definitely unusable. grin I don't see anything wrong with these shots at all. They look plenty sharp to me. I agree that you have to test things out yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On good quality lenses like you have I wouldn't be real concerned about using a 2X. As you can see it does a very credible job. You lose two stops of light, and some focus speed.

I do know a couple of publication shooters that do not use 1.4 or 2X converters because the publications won't accept them. Most of us don't fall into that category.

I use my 1.4 all the time on both the 70-200/2.8 and the 300/2.8. Works a touch better on the 300 than the 70-200.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to add is that on closeup subjects like yours the IQ is much better than on smaller distant subjects. The 2X just won't allow those distant shots to resolve very well.

And "unusable" is an individual assessment that will vary widely from user to user.

Another point to make is that pixel peeping or looking at how sharp they appear on the computer screen has limited value. If the prints are sharp enough to suit you using the 2X, you are good to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Another point to make is that pixel peeping or looking at how sharp they appear on the computer screen has limited value. If the prints are sharp enough to suit you using the 2X, you are good to go.

BINGO!!! I second that motion! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed as well. I've seldom used my 2X although I did give it a good workout on my 70-200 at a college football game before I got my 300mm. Had good light with an afternoon game and the results were fabulous. Actually got into that same discussion today and the conclusion was the same - for subjects taken at a fairly close distance, IQ suffers very little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Lilac blooms are here, just haven't opened. Hearing some reports of good finds in the Houston and Lewiston areas of MN. I checked some new public areas today on the MN side. Could be decent later but too cold and wet right now. Will check some early season spots tomorrow but won't hope for much with the cold weather.
    • Nice!  Must have seemed forever waiting.
    • 6 months later and he is home
    • Three favorites at the moment.  By the time they upload, I may change my mind.
    • A few from Maplewood State Park on April 16th.  Non-professional, but they stood still long enough for me to get 'em.
    • You might be able to figure things out this week.  How big is your sump basket?  Is the  pump kicking in now?  Sit there for 15 minutes and count the number of times it cycles.  That should give you a decent idea on how much water is coming in.  Then figure out about how high the water has to go before it flows by gravity.  The spec for the pump will say something like that it can pump 2,000 gph at 10 feet of lift.  (the gph drops dramatically the higher it has to pump the water).  The answer to your specifics will give you an idea of how big of a pump you need.  If you match the size of the pump as close as possible to the amount of water your will face you can maximize the amount of time the battery backup will last.   Faced with this problem I took a standard boat sump pump and modified it so I could hook up a garden hose.  The I took an old shop extension cord and wired the pump so I could hook it up to a car in the garage.  So just prior to having Noah float by I could hook things up in the garage and be good to go for as long as I had gas in the car to pump up the battery.   Now that I am adult I bought a generator and wired the house to take care of things.
    • Inevitably at least twice each season I will leave the house, drive 45 minutes and walk some of my favorite grouse spots for hours and hours, seeing nothing.  Admitting defeat on that day, I will drive 45 minutes back home, only to find a covey of birds in the driveway...
    • Colonel E.H. Taylor Small Batch Maker's Maker's 46 Bulleit Glenmorangie Highland Single Malt   Copperwing Distillery in St. Louis Park has a nice smooth whiskey. Supposed to introduce a new bourbon in a couple weeks too.
  • Our Sponsors