Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott Stein

Fine For Being On Early Ice

39 posts in this topic

so my dad was telling me that tomorow morning on KYSM 103.5 radio station their havin ppl call in and have their say on if ppl should be fined for being out on early ice! heres what i found on their HSOforum

A man fell through the ice ice-skating on Medicine Lake in Plymouth MN on December 7th. The Minnesota DNR says it's too early to be out on the ice. The DNR will fine you for having your fish house on the ice when the ice fishing season is over. Should anglers be fined for having their fish houses on lakes too early in the season?

what the heck is this!?!? i say if someone puts their house out on thin ice and it goes through,then thats their own fault for not knowing the thickness of ice!!! lets hear what you guys think about this? you can also go to their HSOforum and vote on this issue!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personal responsibility is going the way of the dinosaur. I say absolutely no fines, what a load of hooey!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if people should be fined but... here's the scenario, some one-who-thinks-I-am-silly knowingly goes out on dangerous ice and the officials aren't allowed to say no, said one-who-thinks-I-am-silly falls through the ice and now expects the officials to risk their lives to pull him out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all not holding anyone accountable anymore. If you go out on thin ice and don't due your homework, it's on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At what point do they say its safe? They say its safe at 2 ft and somone finds a spring,falls in and dies ,then what? His family sues the DNR? At NO point should they be saying its safe,to much liability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think this is ridiculous. People need to do what's best for their own personal safety. From the sounds of it the guy who fell through on Medicine wasn't familiar with early ice or what steps we take to ensure our safety. #1 you don't go out one early ice alone. #2 you take it slow, checking the ice as you go. It was a tragedy, but I don't think everyone should be punished for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you expect from a state where if you get caught without a seat belt its a $120 fine, but yet someone can do a wheelie past you on the interstate not wearing a helmet on a motorcycle.

Welcome to Minnesota, Land of 10,000 dumb laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember reading on here somewhere that down in New Mexico up in the mountains, they have everything blocked off untill the DNR/Rangers measure a said amount of ice.

There is no way that this could happen here, too many variables, what about the backwaters, rivers, lakes with springs or current in them, what happens when the lake gets plenty of ice, then the heat wave comes and starts dropping some of those houses into the lake, or if we get an early spring???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I respect and appreciate the DNR for all they do, but I don't think it is possible to regulate laws for being on the ice early. Fishing and hunting are at-your-own-risk sports/hobbies. All they can do is increase the fines for pulling trucks and fish houses out. Maybe they should put more money into advertisements or run ice reports on the local news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm, for the most part, a law abiding citizin...but if it came to laws about when I can ice fish and when I can't I will become a criminal...these proposed laws are becoming ridiculous......if these types of things keep going on we all will be living in the same style homes, eating the same foods, driving the same cars....etc. etc. etc. Zombies!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You did notice neither of the deaths were people who fished. In fact I saw them interview a fisherman on medicine who said the patch of ice they guy went through had been open water the day before. You cant legislate against people doin things that are going to get them in trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't they heard of "natural selection"? I'm a firm believer that if we start down the road of having the goverment tell us when something is "safe" or not we're in for a world of idiots just waiting for someone to tell them when to do everything in their life. It's sad times when no one will take responsibility for themselves. Just my opinion of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fines, although unpopular in this case are probably going to be imposed to defray the enormous cost to rescue people when they fall through the Ice. Is there an emergency reponder on this forum who can tell us what it costs to rescue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I work on an ambulance service. We don't charge unless there is a transport. It kind of sucks when we treat people, and then refuse the transport. Cost of fuel, supplies, time, etc. are a hit.

However when the local fire department is called out, they typically are going to bill. (I got stuck with a fire bill for a false alarm to the house I bought. I didn't own it at the time, but it went with the property.) Amounts can be by the number of fire responders that showed up ($/hour per person), or it can be a set amount. The city ordinances usually state what that amount is, or when/if they charge.

*That's my personal experience, and agencies vary, so don't take it that it's that way everywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a fireman. All departments do things differently.

We charge in 2 different ways. If it's a full blown call, no matter if it's a fire, rescue, car accident, etc it will be $500. If it's what we call a "Nusance" call, meaning a false alarm, guy with a backyard bon fire, etc then the charge is $100.

These charges are not to make money, it's to help defray the costs of the run. Nothing more, nothing less.

As far as fines for thin ice travel is concerned. Let's not give the government any more ideas on how to squeeze revenue from our pockets. Also, I feel this will never happen as who will be the one to say it's safe??? If the DNR says, ice on lake X is safe and someone falls through, the DNR is now liable. So, it's in their best interest to stay out of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to sound cruel here, but yeah it's sad that the idea of an individual having to be accountable for their own choices is going by the wayside. I blame a lot of it on attorney's or more so court rooms that decide to award damages to a person that got hurt mainly by a choice that he/she made.

For example...someone walks on my land, potentially without permission and lets say that it's not posted. They break their leg by tripping over something on my land or something like that and I end up getting sued because in someone's twisted mind I should have made things "safe".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thin ice is something that each look at differentaly. I being heavier 275lbs. know that I will not be comfy walking on ice a 150lbs man would be. So they would have to use a weight chart then you get into decrimatation to big people like me .LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ice fishing and hunting have always been at your own risk hobbies like csrandt said. There are tons of at risk type hobbies. If people are stupid enough to go out on the ice without checking the thickness as they go out, then give them a Darwin Award. Thanks for removing yourself from the gene pool.

On the other side of the coin. My buddies in high school were threatened with fines from the Burnsville Police for being on the lake too early. The catch there was that the lake was still largely open and little kids from the park next to the lake were following them onto the ice. My buddies were suddenly putting the lives of young unknowing children at risk for falling into the open water. I can fully understand were the police were coming from in this case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about a fine for not brushing your teeth twice a day? Maybe we should fine people for eating too much fast food or diving on the shallow end of a pool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see it this way. If it's a volunteer service then charging ("fine" if you prefer) would be appropriate, at least to defray the cost of the service, which is much lower than it would be if it was a full-time service.

If the service is a full-time service then the cost is already paid for through the budget of the program when we pay our taxes. I don't see this any different than the cost for winter snow removal. We never know how much will be spent but we budget as needed to take care of it.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I feel this will never happen as who will be the one to say it's safe??? If the DNR says, ice on lake X is safe and someone falls through, the DNR is now liable. So, it's in their best interest to stay out of this.

The DNR does not currently say a lake is safe so why would they start doing it. They would only prohibit travel on a lake that has been deemed unsafe. I am by no way saying they should start fining people for being on dangerous ice but simply making a point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the idea of fining someone for simply being on "dangerous ice" will work as there are way too many variables involved.

The only way I can see this working is to fine people who actually fall through and require a rescue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Looks like we have at least 1 faithless elector so far.
    • Of the 2 candidates that had a chance at winning, Hillary was the only one that had anything resembling a plan to help rural America. Hillary's plan just didn't resonate because it basically was modernizing rural America, and rural America wants to relive a past that is no longer achievable.    Unfortunately a libertarian is probably an even worse choice for rural areas. While a libertarian would cut federal taxes, they also would significantly cut spending to things like infrastructure where rural areas have a disproportionate maintenance cost to local tax revenue ratio. The Libertarian "privatize everything" or "leave it to the states" mentality would likely lead to many roads becoming toll roads in order to pay for maintenance. And those tolls are by and large paid by locals, increasing costs of local goods and making area businesses less competitive.
    • Well, OSU is going to the playoff, and Wisconsin and Michigan are getting at large bowls. That leaves Minnesota as the #4 remaining team.
    • +1 on striker ice love mine    
    • I know of which you speak and they were full when I stopped by for my new fav Ghost Pepper beef sticks on the last weekend. Well I stopped by on the 1st-2nd and last weekend for the beef sticks! I use to cut up all my Deer until I and the wife wanted some of those more fancy brat's and sausage I just couldn't do.
    • My FXR sled jacket and bibs have the F.A.S.T Flotation Assistance system Technology in them so I get dlb duty out of the suit sledding and Ice fishing. Right now Cab's up in Rogers has the FXR outdoor suits but they aren't cheap. Love mine.    
    • Those look Great. Most of the time just crock potted them to death! 
    • Glad to hear it isn't the local 172 processor people complained about last year.    I was happy to have the needed "facilities" back this year.  Set up, skinned, sliced, diced, vacuum packed and cleaned up in 3.5 hours.  No, that doesn't include the grind, but we do take that in.
    • I go to Petty Bro's in Annandale and have with about the last 8-9 Deer. They usually get it back in about 3 weeks.
  • Our Sponsors