Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott M

Colton Iverson

2 posts in this topic

U's Iverson stays ahead of steep learning curve

Myron Medcalf, Star Tribune

Midway through the Gophers' 71-54 victory Saturday over Cornell, Colton Iverson's 6-10 frame -- his listed height, which seems a couple inches short to most observers -- fell to the hardwood as he wrestled for an inconsequential loose ball. The 235-pound freshman has spent a good portion of his first season in similar scrums and scrambles.

With post players Damian Johnson, Paul Carter and Jonathan Williams all missing time this season because of various injuries and illnesses, Iverson hasn't had time to develop gradually like other freshman big men. Iverson's performance hasn't always been pretty, but the bottom line is: The Gophers are off to an 8-0 start.

"I think that's his style and he's learned to fall the right way," said Gophers coach Tubby Smith, whose team faces South Dakota State tonight. "But for a big guy, Colton Iverson does lay it on the line, and that's what we're trying to get all of our players to understand, to play with that type of aggression. He does it about as well as anybody, especially as a freshman."

Smith does not allow freshmen to be interviewed from preseason media day to the start of the Big Ten season. But in Iverson's case, his performance has spoken for itself.

Preseason individual workouts: Point guard Al Nolen quickly notices Iverson's physical strength, as the freshman challenges the 6-7 Johnson, perhaps the team's best defender, and 6-9, 285-pound Williams. "He hasn't played like a freshman at all," Nolen said. "He gives us a big inside presence with scoring and he also gives us defense, and it brings a toughness to our team that we didn't have last year."

That tenacity alone has helped the Yankton, S.D., native become the clear starter at center. Iverson already is in the team record book with nine blocks against Bowling Green, tied for the third-best individual performance in Minnesota men's basketball history, behind Mychal Thompson and Joel Pryzbilla.

He has displayed a steadily improving offensive game, complete with jump hooks and a knack for dunks off rebounds.

He also has had lapses like most first-year players.

"I'm mostly just working on my post defense and my post offense again," Iverson said during media day. "I'm trying to get bigger, trying to get quicker. ... We just want to perfect everything, get better every day."

Nov. 22 at Colorado State. Iverson's final stat line: five points, three turnovers and five fouls in 11 minutes.

When Iverson faced Colorado State, he picked up two quick fouls and eventually fouled out late in the game. Former Hopkins post player Dan Vandervieren scored 15 points and grabbed eight rebounds in that game for the Rams. Iverson's absence in the first half made the Gophers' 72-71 victory much tougher to come by and also showed his value to the team. Iverson has provided the Gophers with their only sense of consistency in the paint.

By mid-November, he was giving Minnesota more defensively than last season's starting center, Spencer Tollackson. But Iverson wasn't replacing Tollackson's offensive output, averaging only 6.5 points in the team's first four games.

Nov. 26 vs. Eastern Washington: Iverson scores eight consecutive points to spark a 17-3 run to start the game. He finished with 20 points, a career-high.

His point total was impressive, but not as much as the way he went about amassing it. Iverson was more aggressive around the basket than he had been all season. He added five rebounds, four assists and a block. It was as if he had finally figured out that he needed to attack the basket more. He has averaged 11.0 points in the team's past four contests.

"Colton, he was a monster in the paint," Johnson said after the game.

Saturday against Cornell: a Johnson miss bounces off the rim, Iverson jumps up, grabs the ball and slams it, as more than 12,000 Gophers fans roar in appreciation.

Part of Iverson's success so far can be attributed to his attitude entering his first season of college basketball. Iverson simply wanted to contribute. He never planned to earn a reputation so quickly as one of Minnesota's most important players.

"There's a little pressure, it's not too bad," Iverson said before the season began. "I just want to come out here and help the team compete with everyone and help the team out the best I can."


Iverson's been a beast inside at times. I could see him staying 4 years and leaving some marks in the record books. Sampson is still pretty raw, but if they stick around, improve their games, and Tubby can put some athletic slashers and guards around them we could be looking at a team that's thinking Final Four in a couple years. It's only been 8 games but its hard to ignore the potential. I was really disappointed when Cole Aldrich left and now he's being mentioned as a potential first round NBA pick (Can't blame him for going to a place that wins...he's got that NCAA ring for life). I see Iverson as having a very similar game as Aldrich in short time. Fill out the stat book, defend the middle and the rim, clean the glass, post up hard, and be a double double threat every night. Gotta love Colt 45.

The bigs are a piece of Tubby's puzzle. He needs quick and athletic guards in his system and he'll pressure you off the court. If he keeps recruiting at the level he's established he'll get a stash of players that can play at the next level and he will make some deep NCAA runs.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta love this kid.

He has given the Gophers an inside presents that they have lacked for a number of years.

A good shot blocker with the ability to take over a game when he's making his shots.

Freshmen players can be a little inconsistent at times, however he's only going to get better.

With the quality of players that Tubby will surround him with, I see nothing but upside with this kid. Together he and Sampson could take this team a long way as they both mature.

"Ace" smile

Happy Holidays!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming. and this one... Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
    • I use a thin super-line/braid. That said,  a friend of mine swears by mono in really clear water and I've sat with him and seen a lot of wary fish that still get close enough to ruin their day. Not sure if it matters or not... I just like the assurance of braid.
  • Our Sponsors