Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
yakfisher

Anyone Wanna Wrastle???

9 posts in this topic

With the approaching storm and the fresh snow from yesterday, I thought I might be able to catch some active animals this morning at the zoo. Boy, were the bears ever active. These too males went at it for quite awhile. It was fun to catch them playing like this. C&C is definitely welcome. Between the snow and having to eliminate the effects of the glass, the post process took some work. Hopefully the images are fairly consistent.

#1

BearGrapple_edited-1.jpg

#2

Bearpin2_edited-1.jpg

#3

BearPin_edited-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yak, you captured some really great moments here. As I was looking at the first two I was wanting a tighter composition to emphasize the drama of the conflict, and when I scrolled down to No. 3 I got it! gringrin

Really nice work!

I'm interested to find out if the snow was blown out at capture or if using contrast in PP blew it out. If it was blown at capture and you shot RAW, if it's not blown too badly you can recapture the highlights in the RAW converter, usually.

One of the hardest exposure challenges out there is to capture images of dark subjects against snow, because the meter either seems to underexpose the whole image (if the subject is small against a larger background), or overexpose the background (if the subject is large and the background small).

These images look like the lighting was consistent. If so, manual exposure would be a great option. I'd take a test shot filling the frame with the snow and change settings while checking the histogram until the snow itself was just short of blowing out (or if shooting RAW was just a tiny bit past blowing out knowing you could recapture it in the RAW converter).

That way the bears would be exposed as brightly as possible while the snow still had some data in it.

You could use exposure compensation, but when lighting is consistent, manual exposure is a great way to go because there's no meter to get skewed by changing backgrounds.

Now, please don't feel I'm taking away from these images. They are excellent captures and compositions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weren't you a little tempted to join them? grin That would have been fun to watch. Nice shooting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrastle!! I haven't heard someone say "wrastle" since my Grandpa. They look like they were having some fun. Great pics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fun stuff Yak! The snow issues look to be from shooting through the barriers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

Steve, these were all shot in raw and no of them were blown out. I did it in the PP, which is good and bad. Here are a couple of more that it took extra care not to blow out the whites in the post precessing. Thanks for the comments and the pointers.

#4

_DSC2291_edited-2.jpg

#5

_DSC2280_edited-2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool that the captures were well exposed, yak. Good job there. That's the important part. smilesmile

In order to build contrast without impacting the highlights, I use the levels slider and pull mid-range levels to the left (brightening) until it looks washed out a bit, then pull shadow range levels to the right (darkening). Works pretty good as long as I don't go overboard, and the highlights never get touched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice job....I would never have known that they were shot through glass.

Do zoo bears hibernate??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they get fed all winter long so they don't have a need to hibernate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Good luck Anyfish2. Saw quite a few out in the rain driving home today    
    • Well, i will try my hand at picking up another bird for the team starting tomorrow.  Weather looks to be challenging at best over the next 7 days.  I will give my best effort when i can get out.   Birds are still hanging around the area well,  hopefully i can get a tom to break from the Hens.  
    • and this?   
    • Sure seems like a nice little bait. Takes the topwater frog to a whole new level.
    • They talked today about the D inability to find shooting lanes....I like Reilly's ability to walk the blueline with the puck and shoot quickly...maybe he could help...but he is not physical by any means... BB stated he wants a big physical Dman for starters.
    •   Good stuff...the main diff between Chicago and Mn was the way the Bowman took ownwership of the problem and Fletch did as expected today and blamed a hot goaltender, danced around pointed questions...he did however admit we are in a tough position with the Cap and few draft choices but steered clear of ownership to that problem....did you listen in by chance...it was almost laughable
    • BB, I cant say I disagree with any of those observations. They didn't produce when it counts. That is what really matters, but it isn't the first time that teams excel in the regular season and flop come playoff time and it certainly isn't something that is isolated to the Wild. The Hawks get some slack because they have won 3 cups in the last 7 years, but fact is they have been bounced in the last 2 1st rounds too. By that, they are no better than us. We will see what happens to the Caps. They have a tough draw with the Pens this round, but its not a stretch to say they will get bounced 2 years in a row and be the Presidents Cup winner. Lots of teams have that issue. Anaheim has had that tendency too. Playoffs are a whole different animal. The team makeup that works in the regular season usually doesn't translate well in the playoffs. I agree the Wild need more beef. Staal certainly helped, but they are far from a heavy team especially on the back end with our D. Early on I thought we had one of the deepest D corps in the league. Looking at them in this playoff series they looked weak. We needed a guy like Folin to step in and play some minutes and make a difference, but he was shell-shocked in his first playoff game. I don't think we have much help in that area in Iowa either. The heaviest guy we have Seeler, is a liability big time and I don't know if he will ever make it up to the big club.
    • You can pre-order on a Japanese web site ... i almost did but got spooked out with all the Japanese language and had no idea how to translate and know what shipping and price was LOL     i want one but will wait!!!  so many lures and not enough time
  • Our Sponsors