Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  

Mirror slap and scaring wildlife

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently took my 20D along deer hunting, thinking an SLR would be the perfect solution to photographing all the chickadees, jays, nuthatches, and red squirrels that come around looking for handouts. These birds come in very close, especially the chickadees and nuthatches which will eat out of my hand and sometimes land on my head.

However, I was disappointed with the number of keepers I got with the 20D. A majority of photos featured some degree of wing motion as the birds reacted to the mirror flap. This was independent of shutter speed, ranging from 1/100 sec. to 1/3000 sec. Of course the faster shutter would freeze the wing motion more than the slower, but the wing would almost always be in some stage of flight and not in the nice pose I intended to capture. There is obviously enough of a delay between the mirror slapping and the shutter actually opening to allow the bird to react to the sound of the mirror.

In a slightly different scenario, other birds less interested in my snacks would be scared by the mirror flap 15 ft away or so and leave the area. It's frustrating with the less common birds to wait for hours for an opportunity and then only get one shot because the camera scares them off.

I'm wondering if anyone else has shared in this frustration or has come up with a clever way to overcome it. Maybe a way to muffle the mirror flap, or a certain brand the it is quieter than others . . . or do you just have to settle for getting 1 decent pose for every 10 tries.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

matt, the 20D is known for the loudness of its mirror/shutter slap. The 30D, 40D and 50D all are more quiet. The Rebel series makes a quiet little "snick," while the 5D makes a pretty quiet "clunk." The "1" series bodies vary as well, but the 20D is the loudest I've shot.

Mostly when I'm that close to birds I'm shooting from a blind, which serves to muffle the slap quite a bit.

You also can have a camo fleece sleeve sewn that you slip the camera/lens into. You can wrap a tight strong rubber band around the end of the sleeve and the lens hood to keep it in place, and it extends back down the barrel of the lens, widening as it goes and covering the camera. It's open at the back so you can get your eye/face in there to look through the viewfinder and work the camera.

Aside from providing excellent camo and keeping the camera invisible to the birds, the fleece muffles the mirror slap. I have one made out of PVC that I fashioned from the leg of a cast-off piece of camo rain gear, and even that thin PVC quiets the mirror slap somewhat.

It's also a good idea to get in the habit of firing a burst of five or six shots. The first one catches the wing flutter but if the bird isn't scared away, subsequent frames throughout the burst catch it perched naturally. The images in the middle of the burst tend to be sharper, too, because your hand shakes slightly when pushing down and letting up on the shutter button, while it settles down and introduces less shake during mid burst. Not likely an issue at 1/3000, but for sure an issue at 1/100.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip. I'll have to try the camo cover as I don't see upgrading the 20D anytime soon. I'm also going to rig up a perch a little farther away next time-- too much [PoorWordUsage] on the camera!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Posts

    • sorta helps, I'll find it...  thanks... me and google just got it.....     have to go see!!
    • Hall of Fame? You must be joking...... Every player starts out like that. No one starts out with a 23 m dollar contract. He still averaged about 15 million per year for his career, that average probably goes up if he plays past 2018. I think he will be ok.
    • Joe was also the 74th highest paid player the year he won the MVP. You may say he is over paid now but he was underpaid 1st half of his career. @Bobby Bass   I don't think Joe is a future Hall of Famer, not even close to borderline but a great player none the less. I think if the Twins would have made a deeper playoff runs back when Morneau was healthy and Santana was Cy-young would have helped. But Joes playoff numbers are terrible. I could maybe see HOF if he would have stayed at catcher his entire career though..... But he will more than likely end up winning a gold glove at 2 positions, and with one being catcher that is pretty elite.
    • Big Dave most if not all pro contracts are paying you for what you have already done with the hope that you will continue to produce. Looking at todays contract Joe's is not to out of line for a future Hall of Famer
    • Great! He is finally earning a contract close to what he is being paid. 
    • thx.  directions are on the site below. just across river from college 2 areas, up top and down by river
    • Free agency is far from a sure thing, if there are young centers out there (big if) you have to compete with maybe 10 or 20 other teams and pay way over what you should. You have control of nothing and are at the whims of a player everyone is chasing. Same with trades, very easy to swing and miss. By most account we were in on Ryan Johansen with the Preds but Columbus wanted Jones over Brodin and I don't blame them. 
    • Good stuff but time wiill tell. Not buying the "oh we might lose him as a UFA" what, with that kind of money we could buy just as good and younger to give us more of a future...which we desparately need to be thinking about.  Fletch is walking a tightrope and it is going to break IMO.
    • Come on BB, you are better than that. You as much as anyone know that ONE player doesn't make an NHL Team a Stanley Cup contender so why put that blame on him. Sure, a player like Crosby certainly helps, but we aren't talking about the money that Crosby is getting here either. Comparing Koivu's contracts to equivalent players with similar production is quite compelling. He has performed better than many of his peers for his current contract and with the lower AV of his new deal if he continues similar numbers it will be a bargain. I wasn't too happy about the NMC either, but I take that as a bargaining chip so CF didn't have to go with a longer term deal. 2 years is sufficient and I think it works well for both parties. You are right, there are many people out there with more knowledge about the market and what he could have gotten elsewhere and when it may have made sense to sign him, but the fact is you don't want to wait to sign him until after the season for if no other reason at all than to allow him to be a UFA and hear other offers. This will be my last post about the Koivu extension because clearly we don't see eye to eye on whether it made/makes sense, but I assure you there are a large number of "hockey minds" that are in agreement with me on this. Here is some afternoon reading for you:
    • Red admiral i believe.
  • Our Sponsors