Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
FasterThanYou23

Strikemaster or Jiffy?

48 posts in this topic

Ive been doin some thinking and Im pretty positive Im buying a new auger this year.Have heard more good than bad on strikemaster,and more bad than good on jiffy.I pretty much just fish walleye or crappie.What auger would you recommend?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from what i gather here saving a little extra and getting a Nils is what most advocate. Personally I like the Jiffy's a little better than strikemaster but don't really have good reasons, just personal preference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother in law was sayin he wants a nils.He said those are much lighter.But I havent seen those anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nils are available online and in a few select stores.

I personally would go with a Lazer auger by SM. I believe they are just as fast as a Nils. If your worried about weight, get the 4 stroke stikelight, so you get 4 stroke power and the less weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a strikemaster and love it. My father has a jiffy. That being said, I like the strikemaster because its lighter and not nearly as loud. That would be my biggest complaint about the jiffy, especially when noise may be of an issue to you. Also, strikemasters costomer service has been awesome. I had a problem with my recoil, a metal part broke inside. I thought that the warranty may have been up, so I went in to their shop in big lake, told them the problem that I had, they took it into their back room and fixed it right there. also told them it was hard starting since new. they adjusted it and has run great since. never asked when I got it, if there was still warranty, or anything, just fixed it and wished me luck on fishing. I had hears that they run rich from the factory for break in, so if you do get one, run it for a while and then have it tuned up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed throughout the years this question pops up probably the most frequently right next to Vex vs Marc. You will soon realize that this question is similar to walking into a crowded bar and saying ford is better than chevy or vise versa. You will get pro's and con's from both side, ultimately it will come down to several things.

Weight, noise, 2 stroke or 4 stroke, and customer service. I also needed a new auger last year and after reading countless posts, I ended up getting a strikemaster strikelight. I couldn't be happier with my decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a Ford vs. Chevy debate. Both are great augers and you could read 2million responses to this question and not know which one to get. People tend to push the Nils on this site, they are a great auger but you better be ready to break the bank. I bought the cheapest auger I could find ($240 new)about 8 years ago. It ended up being an Eskimo which has a great blade cutting system and I have not had a problem with it. Buy what you can afford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will hear alot of Nills responses but if you are like me, money is an issue. There is quality on the market for hundreds less.

One big reason I went with my Strikelight, is because it is a 4 stroke no more mixing fuel. Just go to any gas station and fill up, and with half the noise of a jiffy. My buddies and I have heard enough augers running we typically can tell exactly what kind of auger is running with out even seeing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought my "JIFFY" model #30. from a friend last year for $50.00.. Excellent shape.. I like it.. "fast" and "powewrful".. BUT.. after I get some taxes back from filing right away, I am going to get a new "JIFFY" or "STRIKEMASTER".. lighter weight.. My buddy has the "4 stroke" Now that is nice..I am thinking about it??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 4 stroke would be nice but if you haven't already, I would read some of the posts regarding quite a few reports of broken augers on the Strike Lite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a strikemaster a couple years ago it was nice for about the first month then just about everything went wrong recoil throttle lever wouldn't start well drive gears chipped/stripped out. went and bought a jiffy and love it...then i won one in a raffle so i have two love them both 8" and 10"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You really can't make a bad choice between the brands. They both use the same tecumseh engine the only real difference is in the gearbox. My personal preference is jiffy and haven't had any trouble using it in any condition. Bought a new STX Pro this year and can't wait to get it out on the ice for the first time this weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont jiffy and strike master use the same motor? how can one be louder than another? I got a good deal on a jiffy stealth stx and it runs like a champ and cuts through the ice the same as any new strikemaster ive used.

The way I see it is strikemaster has shaver blades when sharp will cut slightly faster than jiffy chipper blades but the chipper blades generaly have a longer life.

You'd probably be happy with either and whatever one you get run amsoil saber in it from the get go...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a strike master and i would not change my mind plus you can't beat there customer service my buddy had his handle break i don't remember if he ran it over or he dropped it out off a truck but they sent him a new one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like perch pounder said above either brand would be good as they both utilize the tecumseh engine. Its Kinda a personal preference thing too. I got a 17 year old Strikemaster Cobra pro 10" with a 3.5hp motor and the thing rips!! Rebuilt the carb last year for the first time.Just as fast as my buddys Jiffy 10"he bought last year. But not as fast as my 20 year old strikemaster maglite3 8".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ultimately what made my decision for me is weight. Are you like me who doesn't wait for ice to be wheeler safe or are you out on first ice. I also have several spots that aren't accessible by wheeler or truck, so I walk several miles. When it all boils down weight is on the top of my list. One more thing I think you mentioned you crappie fish. I don't know how you fish, but when we first start off we pop anywhere from 50 to 75 holes. If you are lugging around those extra pounds you will wish you went lighter.

One word of advice, I bought mine last Dec and there is a issue on an there old oil gasket. They realized the problem and now use a better gasket.

The problem: When layed on it's side it would ever so slightly, leak a little oil throughout the day. You couldn't see it leak but by the end of an 8 hour day, the handle would be slippery. I called Strikemaster over the summer and they were more than happy to fix it...they even paid for shipping and handling.

So when shopping make sure you look into the manufacture date and get one that doesn't have the bad gasket. You may even want to call the Strikemaster and inquire about the dates these new gaskets were implemented and if old ones are still on store shelves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 4 stroke would be nice but if you haven't already, I would read some of the posts regarding quite a few reports of broken augers on the Strike Lite.

I've heard of a couple folks who have had a broken auger, and everytime they say customer service was spectacular and a new auger was shipped to them free of charge and in a hurry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im really not a jiffy fanatic here to bash SM but I seem to hear 'something broke on my SM and their customer service was great'. I applaud them for their customer service but why do they seem to break so often? Again not trying to hate on SM just something ive noticed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors