Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
luckydave

Chains on all 4 Tires?

22 posts in this topic

I have a 2005 Polaris 400 and am wondering if chains on all four tires will give the best traction for ice fishing (especially slush). Thanks for your input. This is a very informative forum!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen them on just the rear tires, but I would go with them on all the tires. It will be better for traction and steering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely recommend chains on all four because the back will give you speed but you cant steer if you have a load on the back and you be able to stop better also

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

luckydave,

Thanks for the compliment. This is definitely the best group of riders on the web.

I have heard dealers say that chains on the front will damage the front differential, but I've never seen it happen. My dad had a '94 Polaris 400L 4x4 that had chains on all 4 with no problems. He was amazed at how much more he could go through and pull with the added traction.

As Outfitter17 and hill7410 mentioned, it helps out the steering tremendously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put chains on all (4) tires for sure. I ran a few weeks with just the rear and I was very disappointed. I then put them on the front and it made a ton of difference. I can march through anything it seems now.

BUT, be sure to put the spacers on the front tires or you will rip out the shocks immediately.

I have my chains so tight on my tires they don’t move at all even with no bungees or tighteners.

See Pic below 2005 Sportsman 500:

P1010463-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the wheel spacers are a nylon or delrin ring that mount between your rim and hub to push your wheels farther away from the shocks. You will also need to replace the lugs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question? , Ijust put chains on mine ( rear only) How the heck do you get them tight? I worked for about 3 hours last night , straighten, tighten, drive, re-adjust, repear, repeat, repeat, Still seem loose. I even let all the air out of the tires b4 I started.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last winter I had chains on just the front of my 04 SP 700 and actually broke a drive shaft. Granted it was partially cracked to start with (that I didn't know about). Dealer told me the same thing LEP7MM said. On the sportsmans, with the way the 4wd works, when the rear tires spin the fronts engage (even when not in 4wd is what the dealer said), and if you only have chains on the front, it puts a lot of strain on the drive components. $400 later, I put them on all 4. GREAT traction in deep snow, slush and ice. Much better than without. I was able to walk through the deep snow and slush we had last year that others without chains got stuck in. IMO its worth the extra $30-40 for all 4.

ERW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: spacers. I found 1-1/2" and 2-1/2". Would the larger ones cause any problems with the machine, or would 1-1/2 be best?

I don't want to put something on that would be detrimental to handling/safety. Should the spacers come back off in spring? Thanks for all the great info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

machohorn, Are you sure they gave you the right size chains that you needed?

Spacers on the front? I had chains on the front (and back) of my 500 sportsman last year without any spacers and I didn't have a problem. I will have to double check my setup now.

"hooks"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know on my dads machine, he didn't have spacers. But the chains did loosen up a little. His caught on the front of the floor board more than the shocks, but they had a lot of hard usage.

Ideally, the chains should be tight. I've never put a set on an ATV. Only the garden tractor.blush But the procedure is the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year I only tried them once, Bang piano wire tight, this year I really struggled, I'm heading to LOW next tues, so I want it right, I'm going to drive it around the yard some more and see what happens, Yes they are the correct ones. I hope the rest of the season goes better then this thing, I mean being mechanicaly challenged right from the start, I hope it does not rub off and make me ice/fish challenged!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a quick search for "Installing tire chains on an ATV". I drilled into the top item that showed. There's a step by step with pictures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When my front chains arrive I am going to see how they look without spacers. The spacers are over $100 for a pair. I don't normally drive very fast when ice fishing either. Last year I put some large zip ties on the rear chain fasteners to make sure they didn't come loose. Thanks everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I normally do is:

A. Remove the valve stems from all (4) tires.

B. I then wrap a good ratchet strap around the tire and cinch it down as tight as possible. (One tire at a time)

C. I install chains and get all cross lugs in place

D. Remove ratchet strap, sometimes this can be a pain.

E. Reinstall valve stem

F. Inflate to 7-8 PSI

Spacers;

I needed the spacers, I installed the chains not knowing anything about them. I could not figure out what the chains were hitting. This was just spinning free hand, it hit the shock almost everytime. I went to order from the local dealer and waited and waited and waited. I then ordered over the phone and had the next day. I use the 1-1/2” version. I used the “Piggy Back Type Studs” (Not the best engineering idea) I stripped out 2 of the 8 studs used. I also leave the spacers on year round but do take the chains off as soon as Ice season is done.

You can tell it does put much additional stress on the whole drive train when on dry non slip type pavement.

I would take & post pictures but I am a long ways from where my wheeler is at right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the additional info Ice Angular. I should have the chains next week and then decide if I need the spacers. The spacers I found online have studs included. Good luck this winter!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't put them on yet because I'm still using ATV for deer hunting. Will let you know when I do. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently put chains on all four tires on my Honda but to test the two or four tire debate, I put the rear chains on first and then took the atv for a test drive. I had to almost come to a stop to get it to turn. The front tires would skid alot when turning unless I was just creeping. Then I put the front chains on and what a differance! Steering was greatly improved at all speeds.

To get the chains good and tight, I deflated the tires and made sure the chains were as tight as I could get them before I inflated them. Work the cross chains back and forth and try to get them in between the tire lugs if you can.

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year I installed chains on all four tires of my Suzuki King Quad and was very impressed. The first time out I only used the rear chains and control of the front steering was terrible. As soon as I placed the front chains on also the machine handled like a totally new machine. I worked on installing the chains again today. So far I only have the rear ones installed and used it briefly. Didnt work to bad on the road but I am going to get the fronts on before we hit the ice...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S.D. Ice Angular, I ended up ordering the spacers because there was so little clearance. I'd rather spend a little extra than having a bigger expense by damaging something with the chains. Happy New Year to you.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors