Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Ryan_V

Dish network DVR questions/HD question

Recommended Posts

I have an old dish network dvr. I don't pay monthly for it, it's old school, just a built in hard drive. for you guys and gals that have dish now, how does the dvr service work, i'm confused after visining their HSOforum, do you pay a monthly fee, or is it built into the receiver like mine? I just got a new tv, so I'm considering switching to HD service. anyone have any insight on how this all works??? is extra money for HD worth it? thanks for any information!! I'm sure if I go to a retailer they can explain it too, but with x-mas and ice fishing starting up, there just won't be time! grin

thanks guys (and ladies)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We just went through this about 2 weeks ago.

We switched from (2) 501 DVR's and 2 older non DVR's to (2) 722 2 tuner HD-DVRs.

We had to pay $200 for the second 722, and now you lease them.

If you don't have them hooked to a phone line, you're going to pay an extra $5 per month, they want to make sure the receivers are at the address they say they are.

I personally like the HD content on TV, even the wife does, and she hates TV.

Although, with the new TV, it's not absolutely horrible, it just looks like old TV compared to HD TV.

The box will still look like the box you have now, they're just getting more money out of you.

With the 722, you can record 2 shows while you're watching a 3rd one that's already recorded, or you' can watch one show while recording another, or watch P-I-P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is it worth it to upgrade? my total bill now (no hd or locals or anything) is in the neighborhood of $50. don't want to go much more than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With HD, the locals, America's 200, HBO, 6 receivers, we're at $95-ish.

You can upgrade to HD for $10 per month, plus whatever the receiver fee is.

Personally, I feel it is. My wife could go without, but she's impressed with how it looks, soooo.... it'll depend on your taste I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have them hooked to a phone line, you're going to pay an extra $5 per month, they want to make sure the receivers are at the address they say they are.

That's just plain crazy......so what about the large number of customers that don't have a land line. Does Dishnetwork really charge them 5 extra a month.....

I know they want the phone-line plugged in for PPV retrieval but that's nut's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's true, at least with the 722s.

I'm sure it's to get more money out of the people that have multiple receivers in multiple locations on the same account.

I know of people that have receivers at cabins, houses, pole buildings, all on the same account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have a land line, you can hook it up to your internet connection that's on the 622 and 722 receivers. That will save you the $5.00.

That's what we do. I have DSL coming into the house, and I made them route it behind the TV. I then put the wireless router behind the TV. That way I can easily be connected online with the Dish, and also with the Xbox 360.

KJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have a land line, you can hook it up to your internet connection that's on the 622 and 722 receivers. That will save you the $5.00.

That's what we do. I have DSL coming into the house, and I made them route it behind the TV. I then put the wireless router behind the TV. That way I can easily be connected online with the Dish, and also with the Xbox 360.

KJ

That doesn't help with the receiver in the shop though. laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't speak to the DVR issue. Our computer has an antenna connection that we pull and record HD network programming from. I wasn't aware of a way of avoiding the $5/mo fee for Dish DVR, but may have to check into this.

We have the last updated HD receiver from Dish (no DVR) and we lease for $5/mo. Pulls in lots more HD programming than we used to for the same $10/mo fee. FSN HD is worth the $10/mo alone. Nothing better than Wild games in HD! A lot of the cable channels now have their HD counterpart which improves the quality somewhat. Most of this programming was not shot in HD though, so it's really just an upcoverted signal. Our bill for top 200, receiver lease (1x), HD, and no locals (pull from antenna) is in the low $60's. Good deal in my mind.

My only gripe is the new receiver no longer displays the program information for OTA channels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • sorta helps, I'll find it...  thanks... me and google just got it.....     have to go see!!
    • Hall of Fame? You must be joking...... Every player starts out like that. No one starts out with a 23 m dollar contract. He still averaged about 15 million per year for his career, that average probably goes up if he plays past 2018. I think he will be ok.
    • Joe was also the 74th highest paid player the year he won the MVP. You may say he is over paid now but he was underpaid 1st half of his career. @Bobby Bass   I don't think Joe is a future Hall of Famer, not even close to borderline but a great player none the less. I think if the Twins would have made a deeper playoff runs back when Morneau was healthy and Santana was Cy-young would have helped. But Joes playoff numbers are terrible. I could maybe see HOF if he would have stayed at catcher his entire career though..... But he will more than likely end up winning a gold glove at 2 positions, and with one being catcher that is pretty elite.
    • Big Dave most if not all pro contracts are paying you for what you have already done with the hope that you will continue to produce. Looking at todays contract Joe's is not to out of line for a future Hall of Famer
    • Great! He is finally earning a contract close to what he is being paid. 
    • thx.  directions are on the site below. just across river from college    http://www.munsingerclemens.com/the-gardens/munsinger-gardens 2 areas, up top and down by river
    • Free agency is far from a sure thing, if there are young centers out there (big if) you have to compete with maybe 10 or 20 other teams and pay way over what you should. You have control of nothing and are at the whims of a player everyone is chasing. Same with trades, very easy to swing and miss. By most account we were in on Ryan Johansen with the Preds but Columbus wanted Jones over Brodin and I don't blame them. 
    • Good stuff but time wiill tell. Not buying the "oh we might lose him as a UFA"...so what, with that kind of money we could buy just as good and younger to give us more of a future...which we desparately need to be thinking about.  Fletch is walking a tightrope and it is going to break IMO.
    • Come on BB, you are better than that. You as much as anyone know that ONE player doesn't make an NHL Team a Stanley Cup contender so why put that blame on him. Sure, a player like Crosby certainly helps, but we aren't talking about the money that Crosby is getting here either. Comparing Koivu's contracts to equivalent players with similar production is quite compelling. He has performed better than many of his peers for his current contract and with the lower AV of his new deal if he continues similar numbers it will be a bargain. I wasn't too happy about the NMC either, but I take that as a bargaining chip so CF didn't have to go with a longer term deal. 2 years is sufficient and I think it works well for both parties. You are right, there are many people out there with more knowledge about the market and what he could have gotten elsewhere and when it may have made sense to sign him, but the fact is you don't want to wait to sign him until after the season for if no other reason at all than to allow him to be a UFA and hear other offers. This will be my last post about the Koivu extension because clearly we don't see eye to eye on whether it made/makes sense, but I assure you there are a large number of "hockey minds" that are in agreement with me on this. Here is some afternoon reading for you: https://www.hockeywilderness.com/2017/9/20/16332552/mikko-koivu-contract-extension-minnesota-wild-criticism-overpaid-chuck-fletcher-cap-space
    • Red admiral i believe.
  • Our Sponsors