Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
FLnick87

best combo for me and how much $

20 posts in this topic

lookin to get a new setup for next season. Im a small little bugger (5'5") im currently using just a 6'3" rod but thinkin of getting a 7 footer. considered longer but dont know if that will be too much. medium heavy action? mainly throw spinners and buck tails, showgirls etc...not big on DCG's because they tucker me out...any suggestions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 foot MH should be no problem for you to handle. I have one (Compre) that handles most bucktails pretty well (up to double 8's). Other baits it varies, it's good for all my topwaters, jerkbaits can be a little work at times, and cranks castability varies widely depending on the lure. Not to spendy either, paired with a 6501 (I prefer the left hand retrieve) it set me back about 2 bills after tax. I don't like spending a whole lot, for $300 dollars the fish should jump in the boat when I stick the tip in the water wink No way I'm putting that into a rod when the cheaper ones do the job quite well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd recommend an 8 foot heavy Shimano Compre for the $100 price range. It'll throw the smaller stuff well and you can go a little bigger for other lures if needed. Lifetime warranty too.

I'm a fan of the Shimano Curado 300 reels, that paired with the above rod is a very versatile setup, except when it gets below freezing...

I've got some rods that were closer to the $300 mark, I think they are worth every penny. They really take the work out of a long day of fishing. Shimano Calcutta Inshore casting rods in 7.5 to 8 foot lengths are my go to setup for everything except really big stuff.

Next year i'm looking into the Telescoping stuff a little bit, storing easily would be nice for bigger rods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 Footer at a minimum. My son is 8 and he throws a 5600 on a 6'10" pole and has no trouble at all with it. He throws everything from topwaters to bucktails to jerkbaits.

I would say go with what you feel the most comfortable with. Go to the shops and hold all the different rod makes and lengths and see what you like the best. The longer the rod, the easier it is going to be to throw the larger bucktails and the added value you get is in doing your figure eights/zeros at boatside. Enables you to make a bigger eight/zero, and that is crucial with bigger fish. I personally like the 8 foot St Croix that I have, but am going to also buy an 8 foot Gander Series in the extra heavy. Good quality rods for the price, and if you break them, Gander will replace it without questions. I still use shorter rods for my jerkbaits. Either a 7 footer or a 6'9" extra heavy, but that is my personal preference. Best advice is just go with what you are most comfortable with.

As for reels........I can't really give you much there. Alot depends on the money you want to spend, how you hold the reel and how big your hands are. Example, small handed guys don't really like the Garcia 7000's because they are big and harder to palm if that is how you hold your reels. I am a Garcia fan through and through and they are the only reels that I have. They hold up well (for me) and I have a couple of reels that are nearing 20 years old. One is almost 30 yrs old. If you can afford it, look into the Luna or Calcutta. Very smooth reels and are great, but come with a price tag as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Compre, Gander Mountain, BPS Pete Maina Combos are all good rod values.

Shimano Corvalus and Curado are also good value recommendations for reels like J said.

Bret you'll like the GM rod you're getting, very good rod for the price, I'll be getting another next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The heavier the rod, or stiffer, it will allow you to throw heavier baits and handles those baits better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd recommend an 8 foot heavy Shimano Compre for the $100 price range. It'll throw the smaller stuff well and you can go a little bigger for other lures if needed. Lifetime warranty too.

I really like the 8' Heavy Compre I picked up this year. I'm 5'-7", 8 foot rod is really no big deal. The Heavy version of the Compre seams to work very well throwing most topwater, spinnerbaits, bucktails including the double 10s, etc. Would probably be good for the regular Bulldawgs as well, although I have an Xtra Heavy for the Mag Dawgs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am biased but St Croix's are awesome! Worth every penny in my mind. To be honest my first musky combo was a St Croix avid rod with a St Croix reel and both are still in great shape. That is after 3 years of use and most of that time it was my only musky rod. Now after getting my dad into musky fishing we have a Premier, Triumph, and recently got a Legent Elite and love all of them. We also have a culcutta 400, penn 975, and a abu garcia and have had good luck with those. Notice all the new gear after I got my dad involved!haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all the info. guess i might have to go feel a few out. Anything should be better than the 6'3" i got now but it does do the job. maybe I will try goin longer than 7 and a heavy action..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
thanks for all the info. guess i might have to go feel a few out. Anything should be better than the 6'3" i got now but it does do the job. maybe I will try goin longer than 7 and a heavy action..

Good advice so far, and with the money you do get what you pay for but that can go up and up and up.... I agree with the Compre rods being a great value for a very good rod.

Here's my advice to you: Wait 'til next season starts and offer to buy lunch or snacks for someone with a few nice combos that'll let you hop in the boat with them for a couple hours and try a few out. Lots of good guys here that'll help you out. It's a great way to see what you like first-hand before buying. Then go out and buy what felt best and what fits the budget.

I wish I would have done so years back, would have saved me a lot of $$$ and upgrades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris has plenty of good advices there... Wait til next season and few are bound to invite you along and show u the ropes...

I was shopping around for new rods to purchase... and I found that the Compres in 8'0 are hard to beat... but opted to go for Edge series...

I know I have couple rods thats under 7'6 that I dont use anymore... been meaning to use those for catfishing but never had the chance to go out on catfishing trip yet...

I have 2 8'6 Edges and a 9'0 Strike Reaction MH... I notice I used the 9'0 more than I did with either 8'6... I'm 6'0... and I find that the longer rods works better for me... wider figure 8's, longer casting, etc etc... and I have no problem with working topwaters or jerkbaits with a 9'0...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased two Shimano Compres this fall, one Heavy and one Extra Heavy. Joe's Sporting Goods had great prices. As mentioned lifetime warranties on those rods at those price points can't be matched. I paid $109 before tax for each. The heavy loads up nicely for casting the average lures and bucktails. The XH works well with Cowgirls, especially in the figure 8, and the heavy stuff like MagDawgs.

Using these rods was such a delight. I had always used the Gander IM6 stuff in 6'-9" and 7' lengths and after using my new rods feel like I have been fishing inefficiently and putting way more strain on my body. I now fish in comfort and efficiently. At first you'll think these rods are too big but after you get used them you start wondering how you ever did it before.

GOOD LUCK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any 7'2'' Croix MH fast action, or a gander mtn 7'2'' MH IM8 muskie rod. or get one custom at thorne bros.. ask them what they suggest and when whoever gets done explaining (or them) you'll hand them the cash. for a reel. i'm biased. Calcutta 400 TE. nothing but for what you throw. and you just might (you will) find those DCG/SM types manageable. wink good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

340, I have tried one and they are pretty sweet!

However, with the new line of rods for 09 they have a XH in premier that is 8'6 rated for 4-10oz baits, that would not be a bad option either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've thrown their XXXH rod a few times, 8 foot pool cue. Absolutely FLINGS anything over 6-7 ounces without issue, your shoulder is likely the next weakest link...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The XXXH i'm referring to is rated for 8-40 ounces or something stupid like that. A mag dog feels like a teeny-tiny-little-itty-bitty toy with that rod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the bait oz claims on most rods are irealivant(sp) I throw someheavy baits on my med hvy 7' 1oz-4oz scheels musky rod and it does just fine. I would think that you couls get a combo for 250-300 depends on the reel I use a 400 cardiff and that rod with 80pd PP and it costed me $240 I throw he11 hounds that are 6oz and its a work out but it works. I hope ya find a deal with this hardwater season in full swing good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Where did you hear that food plots were to be banned?   I have seen about banning "feeding deer"  which I took to mean the classic set up a feeder and dump corn and alfalfa in it.     Jumping on areas immediately has been shown to be successful in preventing isolated cases from spreading and becoming endemic.   Once it becomes established in the herd, it seems as if controlling it is no longer possible.   It also seems as if CWD is fairly hard to catch for a deer, or else it would be all over everywhere and all the deer in an area like Dane county would have it.    Oh, and the infected deer could have come from a deer farm, or from Iowa where it has been detected in the county bordering MN on the SE.    
    • I wouldn't call myself wealthy, but I've made good life choices that have enabled me to buy my own land.  Still pack my own lunch and watch for sales at the grocery store.  I don't own land in SE MN, I own land in northern MN.  The reason I am concerned is that this will serve as a template for herd control tactics in other parts of MN.  Understand that the game management agencies have conferences where they talk about managing hunters.  You don't have to look any further than the work of Dr. Gary Alt in Pennsylvania.    I can't put my finger on exactly what is going on with the results the DNR has presented.  Were the samples snuck in by a nefarious actor?  I wouldn't rule it out.  Was the disease always here and just finally discovered?  I don't see why not.  Is there a unique environmental reason that CWD hasn't gotten a broad foothold here?  It's possible.    If the agency had some credibility going into this, I'd be on board pounding kool aid myself, but they don't.  So color me skeptical.  None of the WI border counties along zone 3 have CWD according to this map.  However, Burnett and Polk do and there is no monitoring on our side up there.  Can a scientist explain that to me?  Because the geographic barriers up there are non-existent compared to  the Mississippi River along zone 3.       
    • I made the decision to replace the pump every few years rather than the carpet.
    • On my aluminum skid house I've been using thread cutting stainless steel screws from Fastenal
    • There might be a pleasant surprise in the works.   In the meantime, it is entertaining to watch anyway....      
    • Huh---Guess you must have the butthurt.
    • You are cooking it before you eat it right? I've only heard people using Cure when using dehydrators or may be for jerky when using burger. I have never used the stuff but don't like or make dehydrated jerky.   Seem to still be alive!
    • Creepworm, I am somewhat angry.  The reason it's fool hardy to consider food plots any more threat than a farm field is that the intentions of the planter don't change the flavor of the forage.  A food plot is no more attractive than the edge of a 160 acre bean field that meets a fence line, swamp edge, or grove.     Now imagine there are no farm fields or food plots at all, not even a decent yielding apple tree.  Deer will still communicate via scrape trees and licking branches during the rut.  If the current belief is that the prions spread via saliva, what's to stop wild deer from licking a branch that an infected buck has licked?  What's to stop a buck from rubbing their face all over a contaminated branch?    My fear is that lots of deer are going to be slaughtered in an area that just happens to have been a hot target for eradication before CWD was found.  I'm also worried we're going to get all kinds of bad rules imposed that won't do squat to actually stop the spread if the disease is actually in MN.  I'm worried we'll lose a critical habitat tool that allows us in harsh winter kill areas to help the deer make it through winter (food plots).    It'd be interesting to watch the DNR try to ban food plots.  Good luck defining what is and is not a food plot. 
    • Don't know how they got there.  Maybe they got confused with CWD and wandered up from Iowa.   Or maybe there are a few more but they didn't happen to get shot or didn't get tested.     So, you are a wealthy land owner?  Is the land in 348?     Sure, you are free to question the DNR.   I never said you weren't.   And you, so far as I know, are free to refuse to cooperate with the program to control CWD.   As I have said, that is exactly the response of the land owners in Wisconsin that I recall from back in the day.     However I am curious.   Are you accusing the DNR of planting or fabricating this instance of cwd for some nefarious purpose, like killing most of the deer in that area for unknown reasons?   Or do you just think that these were the only two sick deer and everything will be fine without any action? 
    • Nice product.  Would work great with my Lindell Ice Rigs....
  • Our Sponsors