Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
yakfisher

Geese

17 posts in this topic

Here are some shots that I took across from the gas station after I filled up yesterday. There is a filter pond there and the geese had found a small hole in it that they were drinking from. Any C&C is welcome. I did a fair bit of PS work please let me know what you think.

#1

4gooseflare.jpg

#2

flaringgeese1.jpg

#3

GeeseFlare1.jpg

#4

goosesilhoutte.jpg

Thanks for looking, now get back to your family and friends and enjoy the holiday. I'll hold down the fort from my hotel room here in Dayton. Happy Thanksgiving Everyone!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yak - those are all pretty cool - I like the second one best probably because of the way they are "boatin" in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the 2nd one best as well for the simplicity of the comp and the cool tail angles shown. The last one also is very pleasing. Nice work.

What pp did you do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PP = post processing. You'd said you did a fair amount of photoshop work on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, that's kinda what I thought. I used PS Elements 5.0. Thanks for the compliments. I darn near went blind on that last shot. I was holding down the button and panning with the bird when I saw the sun flash across my eyes. Wow that thing is bright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gotta go with number 2 also, although they are all well shot. I like how the middle goose in #2 appears to be dancing on air.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the pics Yak....there is something about waterfowl that gets me going...I can't explain it...but I really enjoy the pics!

I like #2 the best...paddles down and dropping hard!

I am not sure if you messed with the brightness or contrast or not....but the whites seem a little unnatural. Maybe a little overexposed?? Could be my work monitor too...it was built before transistors!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yak I like #1 the best, the crop seems more natural to me and its a bit sharper. The whites are blown out in #1 and #3. You could use a bit of -EC to help with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dan, that is the type of info I am looking for. These were shot in RAW so I can adjust the EC within PSE or NX2, but I am assuming that you are recommending that I do it from the camera in the first place. I had the camera set to -1/3 EC in an attempt to get it right in the camera. This is the original as shot no PP. My errors may have been in the PP work that was done.

#1 Original

_DSC1575_edited-2.jpg

Thank you to everyone else as well. Since #2 was pretty popular I took the next frame from the series and ran it through Capture NX2. My intentto see if I get similar results with a similar photo from another program and to help me learn a little more about NX2. Here it is again all C&C is welcome, it will only help me to improve.

#2 part Duex

gooseflare3_edited-2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yak, I believe you got it right in the camera. You did the right thing by using -EC. The bottom line best advice I could give you would be get on the other side of your subject. Another words shoot with your subject being lighted by the sun.

I know it doesn't always work that way, but if you were shooting a portrait with this light you would do what? Yes you would use a flash as fill to raise the exposure in your shadows. BIF's really are no different, except you will have a tough time using a flash that far out, so do the next best thing and use the sun.

You are really making it a bit harder and more work because of all the PP work you must do. These days many folks would prefer to just get the shot and fix it on PP, often times successfully. I prefer to spend more time in front of a camera than a computer! Not a knock at all on your work anyone else's including my own, just maybe some food for thought!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yak, I believe you got it right in the camera. You did the right thing by using -EC. The bottom line best advice I could give you would be get on the other side of your subject. Another words shoot with your subject being lighted by the sun.

I know it doesn't always work that way, but if you were shooting a portrait with this light you would do what? Yes you would use a flash as fill to raise the exposure in your shadows. BIF's really are no different, except you will have a tough time using a flash that far out, so do the next best thing and use the sun.

You are really making it a bit harder and more work because of all the PP work you must do. These days many folks would prefer to just get the shot and fix it on PP, often times successfully. I prefer to spend more time in front of a camera than a computer! Not a knock at all on your work anyone else's including my own, just maybe some food for thought!

But, without PP what would I do here in DAY for 30hours on a holiday grin

Thanks Dan, I gotta get em wrong to learn to get em right and if I can learn to fix them along the way it will make me a well rounded photographer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear ya Yak! I've spent more Thanksgivings than I care to remember sitting around hotels! Oh and you are doing just fine, just hoping to give you some pointers to get you thinking grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've actually spent the past couple of days hoping that when I get home they are still using that pond and that the wind is a little more favorable for the lighting and that I can get into a better position. After all it is about 2 blocks from the house. And I definitely appreciate the pointers and opportunity to learn, keep them coming whenever you like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That second shot on your last set is really great Yak! I love that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The simplest rule of thumb for landing waterfowl is to put the sun behind you and shoot when the wind is coming from the same direction as the sun.

Since most waterfowl land into the wind most of the time (you pilots would know about that), that will give you the best opportunity most of the time. Exceptions are when the wind is gentle or variable. And of course birds are individuals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other exception would be this time of year when to sun is low across the horizon and the wind is from the north. My best option with a north wind on this pond will be early or late in the day when I can hopefully get some side lighting. If I'm lucky we'll have a warm front passing and the wind will be from the south shifting to the west. Thanks you everyone for the input, it definitely helps keep it coming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Nelson has been down in recent years in terms of Walleye fishing. Depends on what kind of water you like to fish. The flowage and Moose Lake are good if you like fishing really dark water. Grindstone and Lac Courte Oreilles, maybe even Round are also good walleye lakes, but those lakes have very clear water and will fish completely different than the dark water river impoundments in the area.
    • I think it would be an offensive and experience(post season) up grade. I all reality, we dont have the means to make the trade.  We are nearly out of money(cap space) and only have 11 players.  We need food cheap role players right now.   Only way would be to package Wiggins with future draft picks.  If the analysts are actually correct on how improved we will be, those draft pick wont carry a ton of value.
    •   Well not as many as up by the Emily-Outing area but a few.
    • Still on the fence between going with the cabin or lodge, my dad has a normal lodge and it has tons of room which is great but it also is somewhat heavy for 1 guy to load and pull it seems. I mostly fish with just 1 other person and maby 25% of the time by myself so that was why I was leaning to the cabin which also seemed to have plenty of room for 2 it seemed to me. Also from what I understand the cabin will fit in chevy crew cab box and the lodge won't? I have a 04 crew cab short box so one more incentive for the cabin if thats true.
    • Sounds perfect, thinking your guys reviews will seal the deal for me once I can see one in person again, a hyfax kit will also be on my list as I plan on pulling it behind my sportsman 570. Thanks for the review also AAmerican, it's early to be thinking ice fishing but I'm sure there's people out there like us that are a little anxious!
    • The Chippewa flowage would be a great place to start. I will be honest. Walleye are not what I have ever chosen to Target when I fish up there but the flowage is a great fishery.    Nelson lake would be another choice.
    • I have had 3 of the otter pro xt's, a cabin, lodge and resort. I still have the resort and recently purchased the cabin. I have not had many different brand portables but have fished in other brands buddies have. They are the nicest portables I have personally owned and until I try something I like more I wouldn't change from them at all. The resort is heavy and not something I like dragging far by hand especially loaded with gear and much snow on the lakes. But it has tons of room and I have fished 4 people in it before, a little tight but doable. The cabin I purchased for more hand pulling and an extra for if I have people along. They are very warm and I have fished in them down to -30 deg F. A regular buddy heater keeps them plenty warm, if it isn't to cold or the house is banked well its easily t-shirt weather inside. The resort needs a big buddy heater for colder days sometimes due to the larger size but isn't terrible with a regular. Overall very happy with them all and have been very durable. Also no dripping of water from the ceiling. Highly recommend a set of hyfax for the bottom. I had over 1000 miles pulling my old lodge and they hyfax held up great but I always pulled on snow and not across asphalt much at all.   Changes I have made to them: - added a battery box and inside LEDs  - used stainless screws on the band that hods the fabric to the tub only because I don't like the look of the rusted screws.     If you think you'll be purchasing one I would recommend stopping at a Gander Mountain if you have one near by and getting a set of hyfax since they are going out of business there is a good amount of ice gear. I found hyfax recently there for $15 a set.
    • We are on Lake Edward at WildWoods RV resort just north of Merrifield, MN. It is nice just driving up, unlocking it, playing for the weekend and locker her back up and leaving the frig on.  They let Atheists and Jesus freaks all in!
    •   My wife and I are starting to think about parking ours someplace. I'm tired of trying to get reservations and having to hook and unhook and all that goes with a weekend of camping. Plus I would like to have the toys available like 4-wheeler and boat.   We are looking at places up north. We know several people and like the Emily-Outing-Remer-Hill City area. I think you a further west, right? Brainerd area maybe?  
  • Our Sponsors