Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
2 DA GILLS

Pointers & Cripples - Need some help

9 posts in this topic

OK - I am sure I am going to get a whole range of answers and someone will tell I am doing something completely wrong, but I am going to ask anyway.

Is there something I can do to help my dog understand the difference between a crippled bird and the ones I actually want him to point? At times he does fine with it, but other times he points the cripples and it is a never ending point & chase. He is in his 4th hunting season and I would estimate that he has had 300+ birds shot over him between hunting and training.

There are some different scenarios here:

1) Bird is pointed in grassy area - flush (dog has visual on bird) - shot - cripple - chase - recovery. Those are easy ones.

2) Bird is pointed in cattails - flush (dog has no visual on bird) - shot - cripple - dog still holding point - dog called to area of downed bird - cuts track - back into cattails - pointing game begins

He has been FF trained, but his pointing instinct is very strong - almost too strong. It is really only an issue with very heavy cover such as cattails (where I do a lot of my hunting). Any tips or training tricks I can use, but still make sure I maintain his steady points? I do not want to lose his rock solid points, but I am a bad shot.

Maybe my solution is to join a trap league next summer and become a better shot. The birds are being pointed for me - there is no excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having only trained flushers, I've always wondered when another owner of a flusher gives the command "dead bird". IMO its not needed but I guess if there's an amount of time from shot to recovering it could help to coax a flushing dog to work.

In your case you want the dog to do something that is opposite of what you trained him to do. To him the cripple is just a live bird. I know some pointer guys that will say that comes with the territory. I know one in particular that doesn't feel that way and has no problem commanding his rock solid pointer to flush in some cases. One scenario is just like yours, cripples in cattails. It sounds like the dog is solid on his pointing and IMO wouldn't do the following unless he was. If your getting him on that many birds it won't be hard to incorporate another training exercise with a command(dead bird) for that purpose, breaking off a point to retrieve.

Its just a matter of how you do that.

Start out with retrieving sessions in cover. Send him off like you do, when hes about to pick the bird up give a command (dead bird). Lots of reps there, and actually something that could have been done at his first retrieves.

I'd simulate a hunt and start out with a dead bird hidden.

If he points let him hold a point, then command him to retrieve followed by dead bird. To keep him honest I'd mix that in with live birds in your normal pointing routine.

I'd then change from a dead bird to a shackled bird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, every dog can be different. My 11 year old gsp has pointed cripples most of her life. Sometimes she'll chase and fetch, but she's just as likely to point it. The new 8 month old just has a knack for knowing. I can't explain why.

That said, I do work on the "Dead Bird - Fetch" command a lot. Even the older female understands that when I give that command it's OK to break and catch the bird. Even on a bird that goes down dead and they are heading to retrieve I give the command so that hopefully they begin to put that command together with physically picking up a bird and bringing it back to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he's been through the Trained Retrieve then he should understand that when the command is given he is to retrieve no matter what. That he is not suggests that he may need a refresher course or some situational training.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gspman,

That is the response I anticipated. The strange thing is that he spent a month with a pro trainer in August and he said his FF was solid. That being said, I am not sure that the cattail scenario described was worked on specifically. Grassy areas - no issue. Cattails - problem.

This fall we just started using the "dead bird" command to help with the search. It has worked on ducks, but not as well on pheasants.

Thanks for the suggestions and comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how my Britt figured it out, but when he hear's the shot and sees the bird go down, he heads straight for the bird and retrieve. Wish I could say I did something to teach him, but that credit goes to the dog. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My setter Buddy points dead birds fairly regularly and I see no problem with it. He is very honest with grouse and that just carrys over to pointing dead birds. I do use the dead command but I am very careful with it because sometimes I think he is pointing a dead bird and it is another live bird holding tight in the same area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Chris..... Frank is correct with regard to the "dead bird" command.

I use it with Belle and do not have an issue with her pointing a cripple. Need to start with training sessions. What is really cool about it is now when a bird is shot that she does not see, I can take her to the spot and tell her dead bird. She immediately starts circling until she picks up a scent and then starts her track if it is a cripple. You can use the command in the yard with a dummy and also when throwing out a dead bird. Then work up to a shackled bird that Zeus can see, fire a shot in the air and then send him with the dead bird command. He should chase it down. This should not stop him from pointing birds that have not been shot at. Hopefully her with make a connection between a gun shot and a dead or crippled bird.

We had a funny situation a few weeks back in SODAK. Belle pointed a rooster and I flushed it right in front of her. I then shot the bird out about forty yards. I sent her for the retrieve and when she got to the spot where it went down she went on point again. I started to walked up to her and a bird flushed to my big surprise. I thought it was the same bird, was completely off guard, shot and missed. I really felt bad thinking a wounded bird had gotten away. Belle then went forward about 5 yards and picked up the first bird which had landed very close to the bird that we missed. How she knew the difference is beyond me...

Hopefully we can get out in December and discuss further..

Good hunting.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a bird come down alive in a giant crp field this weekend. As I was walking toward where it went down and where the dog was the grass in front of me moved and then froze. Thinking this was the bird I watched Dixie follow the trail my way and point about 2 feet from where the grass quit moving. I said "fetch" and she dove in and got the bird.

I think once you can get your dog to break point and fetch what it's pointing it'll be fine. This might come with more experience or you may need to do the situational training as mentioned earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Could be that others cheated also.   I was relying on memory about the BMW connection and hypothesized that Mercedes would also have been a possibility.   I did say "maybe mercedes".     In any case, VW cheated on emissions for many years with the assent of the highest levels of management.     Apparently making a small diesel that runs ok and doesn't make too much pollution at an acceptable cost is really hard.
    • License what technology, this kind?        https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/04/27/after-vws-record-fine-mercedes-benz-parent-daimler-could-be-next.html     "In light of the ongoing governmental information requests, inquiries and investigations, and our own internal investigation, it cannot be ruled out that the authorities might reach the conclusion that Mercedes-Benz diesel vehicles have similar functionalities," Daimler said in its newly released quarterly report. The maker first acknowledged in January that authorities had begun probing its handling of diesel emissions. That was the same month that VW agreed to settle a criminal probe by the U.S. Justice Department, a federal judge this past week approving the payment of a $2.8 billion fine. Almost 40 times the legal limit In the VW case, the mainstream German automaker rigged the software controlling two diesel engines to recognize when a vehicle was undergoing emissions tests and then adjust pollution levels. In real-world situations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asserted, those powerplants would produce up to 40 times the legal limit for pollutants like smog-causing oxides of nitrogen. Since the scandal broke in September 2015, regulators in the U.S. and the European Union have begun rechecking the emissions claims made by other manufacturers, including Daimler, General Motors, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and others. In January of this year, the EPA took aim at FCA, alleging that it may have used its own, rigged software on products like the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel which "appeared to cause the vehicles to perform differently when being tested" than when in use in real-world conditions. That same month, Daimler said that what the EPA was concerned about "apparently includ(ed) functionalities that are common in diesel vehicles, as undisclosed Auxiliary Emission Control Devices (AECD)." While the German parent of both the Mercedes-Benz and Smart brands did not confirm it had broken the law, it laid open the possibility that its own diesel emissions strategy could be in trouble. "If these or other inquiries, investigations, legal actions and/or proceedings result in unfavorable findings, an unfavorable outcome or otherwise develop unfavorably, Daimler could be subject to significant monetary penalties, remediation requirements, vehicle recalls, process improvements and mitigation measures," Daimler stated.
    •   Wow, Del I forgot all about that little discussion you started two years ago.  All the fun folks were in on it, even the LIMITOUT. That's what happens when you have short term memory loss and and pictures bring on new thoughts and emotions.  Let's just call this threat the "What a dang waste and shame!" More of an aftermath threat?  K
    • When we had are seasonal campsite I had lots of squirrels. I used all metal feeders. Come Sept them squirrels went in the freezer and cooked up for the wild game feed!
    • If you have been following the story, the reason VW got in this mess is they didn't want to license technology from BMW (or maybe Mercedes) and chose to develop their own.   When it couldn't be made to work properly, they chose to cheat rather than bite the bullet.    Long discussions of what happened as the story broke    
    • I had one of those.  Mine never quite ran right, although I lived with the quirks for years.  I have a pdf of service manual if you want it.   Mine ran rough intermittently at certain rpm.
    • If they make it better because of stupid government mandates it wouldn't bother me at all.   In fact, the Dodge ram diesel that I used to have had something from Daimler Benz that allowed it to meet the standards without DEF. I would not be surprised if they did something similar with those diesels and if they did I applaud them. The best thing anyone can do with the diesel trucks is delete the emissions and unlock the power and economy that are robbed from them.   
    • pellet gun does the job here  
    • I have to many squirrels, need the feeders with the metal holes.
    • build it and they will come. 
  • Our Sponsors