Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Cast Master

P-line vs Gamma?

40 posts in this topic

Will someone please explain the differences/pros and cons of these two lines. I honestly don't know much about them, but see that a lot of people are using one or the other for ice fishing. I have always just spooled up my ice rods with my "left over" Berkley line from the open water season, but feel like I can do better. How do the underwater visibilities compare? How about stiffness? Are these two line types good all around, or do they have specific applications in which they shine best. Best for pannies and walleyes, or can they be used equally well on my pike jigging rods?

Any info and/or comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both lines are very good. I am not sure how P-line is made, but I can tell you a little more about Gamma(I am on the ProStaff)

Once the line is Extruded(how fishing lines are made) The company runs the product through Gamma Radiation, hence the name. This alters the chemical make up of the line creating more areas to bond, which allows the line to be more limp, yet keep its strength.

I cant say anything bad about p-line its a great line, but I have been more impressed with Gamma than I have with any other line in my life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second Gamma, but Pline Flouro-Ice was probably the most talked about line last year. I'm going to try it this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deitz

Is Gamma a monofiliment line that is then treated with this process or floro?

What about knot strength/ease of tying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gamma's a polyfiliment, which is closer to mono than anything else, the difference is that poly means many, whereas mono means one, and filiment is self-explanatory.

Gamma is much limper than flourocarbon, so ease of tying would be easier, but with such light line you might not notice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the difference of the two but I have used Sufix. 3lb is all I use and I love the stuff. Never had a break off from fish unless I didn't retie which is my fault. There 1 and 2 pound is not for me. Doesn't pass my tests but you may like it. It's a strong and but limp line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deitz

Is Gamma a monofiliment line that is then treated with this process or floro?

What about knot strength/ease of tying?

RR, Gamma is a copoly(most lines these days are), Gamma Edge is 100% florocarbon...

as far as your knot strength question. That is one of Gammas best selling points.. Far superior knot strength.

People could say I only say these things because I am on their staff.. But I truly believe in the stuff! Best line I have ever used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P-Line FlouroIce is a line I use a lot. Flourocarbon means invisible under water, minimal stretch so easier to detect lite bites, and stiffer. Maybe a little touchier to get good knots tied.

Gamma is a copoly, a blend of line types, with the best characteristics of each. Limp, easy to handle, easy to tie good knots, low visibiility under water. Whether open water fishing or ice fishing, I don't use much mono any more, I use Gamma copoly instead of mono.

There are a few lines and flouros that I've tried on my gear that I absolutely hated ..... and I mean hated. LIne jumping off the spool, line twisting and coiling, bad knots, too stiff to get good lure action or bite detection, etc. But I absolutely love ..... and I mean love ..... fishing with P-Line and Gamma.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was fortunate to get a chance to run some of the new Gamma lines as they first hit the market some years back now, and I was skeptical it was anything really "New"...but it proved to me quickly it was most certainly a superior new concept in line, and held up very well to serious use.

The Gamma Polar ESP Ice line is amazing user friendly stuff. On ice reels that I do run mono, it is Gamma ESP Ice for sure. I use a lot of Power Pro Ice line too, and as needed I run a Gamma leader. They work very well together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i used p line all last winter on everthing i had and i really liked it i don't know any thing but it but i like it and am going to use it this year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's clear some confusion.

Both Gamma and P-line are monofilament lines and both are copolymer lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gamma also has 100% Fluorocarbon line, not sure if that would qualify to be termed a copolymer, as it is pure fluorocarbon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed, true, Gamma does have Gamma Edge which is 100% pure Foro, its in the dark black and gree box.. but they also have Gamma regular, but its just called gamma.. its a copoly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup..the competition grade Gamma..good stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just wondering how either of these lines work outside .do they stiffen up ? i tried, i think it was the p-line and when it got cold it really stiffened up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the real beauty of the Gamma Polar Ice ESP, it is flexible in the cold.

Pure 100% fluorocarbon does not play well in the cold, just too densely made. Makes reasonable leeder material but you get better fluidity of lure action with the ESP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gman, All lines will stiffen up. Thats all there is to it. The lighter the lb test the less it seems to get stiff. Braid lines will be worse yet as they will absorb some water.

I dont fish in a fish house all that often, if the conditions allow, I much prefer to be mobile and moving which leaves me outside much of the time. I use 3 lb test for crappies and gills.. 4 for much of my walleye fishing, 6 lb on a few if fishing a lake that has larger fish(mille lacs, LOW).. I use Gamma and dont feel that the line is too stiff... just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the added info guys, I will be picking up some of both to try out this year!

One more question, does anyone prefer using floro when fishing light jigs in deep water? I know that the line is heavier than mono and will sink, but does it help (much) to get the jigs down faster?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RR56- That about the only rod I have Floro on..I have quitea few UL panfish rods as that is my main target specie in the winter.. I have many with regular 2 and 3 lb copoly.. but I do have a couple with 3 lb floro, for getting ultra light jigs down in deeper water, thelure also has a different action that at times seems to help. Got to be careful when tieing the knot with Floro though, and Floro is much more expensive too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of flourocarbon lines out there are copolymer lines - two or more materials in a monofilament line. Most of the time it's a flourocarbon coating over nylon. Only recently (excluding leaders) did floro lines come out with pure 100% flourocarbon lines. Flourocarbon line was just too stiff for spooling.

I used Yozuri Hybrid last year and will use it again this year. It's quite stiff and coils off the spool when it gets cold. But it's also very water repellent so outside fishing, is awesome with it. I will compare P-line flouroice this year.

In general floro material is more stiff compare to nylon material. When you get down to 2# line, maybe the more stiff line will be more beneficial at times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just noticed that P-line flouroice has a slightly smaller diameter than regular P-line flouro. Did I notice wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gamma is the same way Slip.. The ice lines are a thinner diam. I expect the companies do this to have a limper line.. I know with the Gamma, the diam is smaller, but so is the actual breaking strength.. Yet still rates higher than that what is listed on the package.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deitz I still have trouble finding those 4# gamma ice line. I remember you said Thorne bros had them last year, but any idea when are the Gamma ice line going to be avialable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors