Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
minnesotamusky

Strike Master???

10 posts in this topic

Why doesn't StrikeMaster sell the 224 anymore?? Was going to buy one this year..... frown Anyone know????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know I asked them about that but you can still get them at various stores. Do a google search

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason that i was told from a guy i know personaly that sells them says they discontinued it because they had too many problems with the blades falling off them! mostly the small blades i was told . but they are amaazing if you put them on a power head that has the power and rpm to move it fast!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had a problem with mine so far and man o they cut fast...a shame they discontinued them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the ice is going out of business and they still have one of them for sale on their HSOforum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 224 was discontinued due to lack of sales. Tough following up something that works as well as the Lazer Mag!

Joel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was told at Gander Mountain that they were having problems with people getting hurt when the blades got jammed in the ice. I laughed at him and told him to look for a new job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Joel is probably a little closer to the truth on the demise of the 224. I was pretty lucky and got one for a steal when they first came out. I heard getting jammed in the ice was the problem with the laser triple that strikemaster had out?? Not sure. I imagine with twice the bolts, having a blade fall off would be twice as likely as a regular lazer model? I check mine frequently to make sure they are tight.

The 224 was a pretty nice auger. Mine was a little cold blooded the first couple of months - needed to be started on choke always, even after drilling 5 holes just minutes before and had to idle a good 2 minutes before it would cut without bogging down. It was a little frustrating, but now it runs like a top. Always starts on the first pull and is a fast cutter.

I just ordered a new set of blades. The originals still cut well when I put it away last March, just figured it was time to get a new set. I ice fish 3+ days a week and some days punch an obscene number of holes. I think I went through around 3 gallons of gas last year. The longer auger shaft is great, rarely need an extension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More expensive to make, the 224 drill bit that is. And less sales is why this bit was discontinued. The 9 inch Lazer bit was also discontinued for the same reason. You will always be able to get replacement blades though, for both bits.

And, if your looking for one, there are still some left. Buy em now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors