Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Powerstroke

Got one this morning!!

Recommended Posts

I know I know where are the pics?!? I don't have them because my wife took the camera on her vacation this weekend. SO, you'll all have to wait till sunday unless I get the grainy "bigfoot-esque" photo off my cell phone.

Thats okay, it was a big doe. If you've seen one you've seen them all. I'm doing a Three Rivers hunt so its for management purposes, but its still just as fun. I saw 7 deer before 10am. including a small 6pt and a small 8pt. Both probably 2.5yr olds.

The doe I shot was aged by their tech as a 3.5yr old doe and weighed 115 pounds dressed out. She was a pig.

Double lung shot and nicked the heart at 12yds with my Xforce and the Rage 2-blade. She went maybe 20yds.

I can't wait for tomorrow morning. There are some big rubs around and I want to find the BIG BOY!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The doe I shot was aged by their tech as a 3.5yr old doe and weighed 115 pounds dressed out. She was a pig.

Congrats!

I do particularly like that data point. Seems on the small side for a 3.5 year old, but its more realistic than all the 150+ lb does or 200+ lb bucks that are reported all the time. I think if people really weighed their deer, they might be a little shocked at what they really do weigh in at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biglakebass wrote: I think if people really weighed their deer, they might be a little shocked at what they really do weigh in at.

_________________________

Isn't that tthe truth!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tech thought it between a 2.5 or 3.5 but he said there was some wear on the molars so he leaned towards older.

Dressed out she weighed 115lbs (I held the scale) but I've never weighed a deer previously. That being said, I shot a doe last year that was much bigger so that only increases my curiosity about how big the one from last year was.

She did have plenty of fat on her so I know she wasn't running too lean or anything. Maybe she was only 2.5yr old. I don't really know and it doesn't really matter. I thought it was a neat little tidbit of info since I've never had a deer aged or weighed before.

Another stat I can verify, the backstraps weighed 3.5 pounds EACH!! That was 7lbs of pure venison tenderloin!! shockedgrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice deer Powerstroke!

I would be proud to have one hanging right about now whistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job. Don't let these guys bug you. We weigh every deer that comes into our camp, 115 lbs is a BIG doe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job. Don't let these guys bug you. We weigh every deer that comes into our camp, 115 lbs is a BIG doe.

Just to be clear, in no way am I saying its a small deer. I am saying its very realistic compared to all the reports of 150+ lb does we read about.

I just mentioned it seems light for 3.5 years old.

By all means a great sized doe, regardless if its 2.5 or 3.5 years old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to go Stroke - congrats on the doe. Looks to be some good eating for sure. You sure those weren't the backstraps/loins? At 7 lbs, those would be the largest tenderloins I've ever seen! They're only about 10-12" long and weigh under a lb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More 170 lb. bucks get misidentified as 200 lb bucks than you can imagine. Actually weighing a dressed deer is an eye-opening experience for many people. The weight of many deer are estimated and over-estimated by the successful hunter.

There is a very large big buck contest in western Wisconsin. Thousands of bucks are entered and weighed each year. The average buck usually comes in around 142-145 lbs. The winner is usually around 195 lbs. Some years they get a real 200+ lber. I do think on average western WI deer are a little smaller than northern MN deer the difference isn't that great.

Bottom line, 115 lbs is one heck of a nice doe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
More 170 lb. bucks get misidentified as 200 lb bucks than you can imagine

I'll agree with that. I guessed my deer at 170 but only made 152. But out of thousands of deer registered, not one legitimate 200lb'er? I find that hard to believe. The WI strain of deer isn't that much different than MN. They're rare but not that rare. There's been quite a few reported in MN already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • I will decide if that is true when I get my nills back out. hopefully soon. 
    • Would you be able to post pics of your bed again?  I really like that idea, very smart.  Would you make any changes on the next one.  Should get my firebrand shell this week, lots to do.
    • Beaver Bay sports rents although I've never used them. 
    • There's really no wrong way of doing a roast if ya ask me, it's all personal preference. Crockpot,  roaster, oven or boiled (del) . Although I do enjoy throwing cold smoke this time of year at a roast before it hits the roaster!!
    • 2nd that,  30 years here...
    • oh wow!!!!!  poster too!!
    • Yer gonna be blowin' chunks one of these days, Delbert. Why not just an easy overnight marinade, then in the crackpot on low, and lift that lid a few times to keep the heat low? I always pull mine at 4-5 hours on LOW, not the 6-8 they say. I have about 155* internal and still pinkish at that, and I have 3 different crackpots I use. Never had it fail in oh, ten or fifteen years.....maybe because I always do a top round or rump, instead of an arm or chuck. You DO  occasionally get a tougher one, that has a lot of sinew in it, that's why I eyeball mine so carefully. (working 2 yrs at the butcher shop helped, too) I always let it sit in a covered glass dish for 10-15 mns before I start slicing away....
    • I worked with stainless for 28 years, it's the way to go.
    • Yeah, I forgot to include the LEM, which is basically the Rikon with a different badge. I know that style will cut better and definitely be a better unit. Just not sure if I am going to justify the price at 2x higher for a very occasional piece of equipment.    A wood bandsaw could be used. The saw doesn't know whether it's cutting meat or wood. The difference is that a stainless table and blades would be preferred IMO. Cleanup probably isn't much different between all of them.
  • Our Sponsors