robert1965 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I might splurge and buy the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esox_Magnum Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I have owned both and kept the LX-5 sold the 2 Vex's. No regrets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muc33 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I don't have anything bad to say about Vexilar, but I will say for my convienience I preferred the fine line value I got with my Marcum. I often....(no wise cracks here guys) got confused when I would take my focus off of a vexilar, and then look back. So many color lines in so many places, where with my Marcum the fine line was less confusing for my focus of my jig placement and bottom or fish. So basically that feature has me using Marcum. I have both an LX5 and LX3tc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hudson Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Both are good products, and get the job done.But, personally for me, Vexilar gets the nod. First and foremost, for me, its Vexilar's dependability and reliability from out of the package to the years of use and abuse they can take, while never seeming to break. Second, would be the options you get from Vexilar, to configure your flasher into whatever you want it to be, would be next (choices of packs, transducers, add ons, etc). From there, the list can go on and on. But...As, I said before, Marcum, does make a great stand in the ice sonar market. Same to be said about the new Hummingbirds. A lot of great features. But, to me on the aspects of reliability and overall options, I truly believe Vexilar gives the total package to a consumer in the realm of ice electronics. Just my own opinion though. And get what makes you comfortable on the ice and what type of flasher meets your needs. Check em out at various stores, have a buddy show you what they run, etc. Lots can be learned from that and what you want in a ice sonar system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartner62 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 You just opened a can of worms with that question! I have also owned both and I would never give up my LX5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerchJerker Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I've owned both. Performance from both flashers is great, it'd be hard to find complaints with either. A few personal preference things I like about the Marcums are that they are small compact units, and I like the adjustable zoom feature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquafang Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Have both. I use the vex for back up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SP180 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Last year i did a survey on 3 forums and received 60 reply's. 40 were marcum users and 20 were vex users. Only one vex user was a previous marcum user (switched due to faulty unit). 30 of the marcum users were prior vex users and would not go back. Interesting how that played out. They all stated that the marcum was easier to read and easier to use.Just a previous observation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random guy Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 For me it is night and day,literally. When nightfall hits Upper Red Lake we get alot of clutter in the water from micro organisms to zooplanktons etc etc along with fish that hug the bottom like race cars sticking to a track, low and fast. I feel the Marcum does a much better job with its zoom and super fine features then then the other when it comes to target seperation and a cleaner picture in my dirty water. Plus I like how the Marcums pack up, fast, easy, sqaure and ready to move, even for the bucket guys. Just flip the lid down and go. Everybody on the Waskish Minnow Station/Outdoors with Jonny P team uses Marcum and we would hard pressed to change after so many years of great service. Don't get me wrong I have other makes of flashers sitting in my war room and that is what they do, sit there because I just like my Marcum better. I am really looking forward to the " Marcum High Power Challenge" that will be held this winter compairing all the units in a real world setting. I believe we are having one on Upper Red Lake out of Westwinds resort Jan 10th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCLaker Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I personally perfer vexilar. It had the features and reliability that was important to me. Rather than comment on any of the cons for either - I'll focus on the pros on why I went with an FL-20:- Night viewing mode is a must if you have ever used a flasher in lower light condition for longer periods of time. Reduces the brightness by about half. Significantly reduces eye strain.- Flat screen does not collect water/snow on it.- Flat screen allows for a much wider viewing angle - Very helpful if you are trying to teach a partner on how to use a flasher.- Does all the basic features most higher end flasher have very well.Regardless of which way you go, my guess is that you will be very happy. There is no doubt that either will get you more fish up the hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Sandberg Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Vex here. A lot of the "pros" these guys are talking about is whats actually causing the unit to break down. The marcums are blasting soo much power through their transducers that the crystal inside the transducer is breaking down. That's whats making people have to get new ducers. Also, the toughness factor seems to be better on a Vex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTro Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 There’s no right or wrong answer here. If you buy the top end of any companies flasher, you will be happy with it. No doubt about it. Take a minute to look at how you will fishing. What species and what depth. Is an adjustable zoom important to you? Is a dual beam transducer important to you. How about a superfine line for maximum separation? How about interference, do you plan on fishing around a bunch of people at times? Do you prefer a compact folding arm type transducer cable bracket or a foam float? Do you like a flat face design? Do you like the response and display of a flasher, or maybe an LCD screen fits you better. How about the case it will be carried in, do you prefer one over the other? Using the term “best” is a gray area. You really need to decide what features will suit your needs. All the units out there will show you the depth, your bait, and the fish. First and foremost that is the most important thing. After that, what is important to me is being able to zoom throughout the water column and also being able to separate individual fish amongst other fish and or schooling baitfish. Lastly I also want to be able to reject any interference from other units nearby. The LX5 fits my needs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deitz Dittrich Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 As many have said.. all the top units are great.. I am a depth finder junkie... I own an FL-18, LX-3, LX-5, and Showdown. Not to mention that I have 2 Hummingbird SI units on my summer boat.For me, hands down.. The Lx-5 is the best unit on the market. Moveable zoom and best interfierance reduction is what sells it the best in my eye. The dual cone angle for fishing steep drops or in weeds doesnt hurt one bit either. My opinion.. Get the LX-5. As far as I am concerned, the LX-5 has no Cons at this point. I have put countless hours through both my 5 and my 3.. and both tranceducers are doing great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey lee Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 K-DawgIn regards to your post about power and the ice ducer, all of your information is totally untrue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymondk Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 it is hard to go againt something that is proven as for the adjustable zoom and the higher power most of the time these features are worthless in most situations there might be times where it might be needed but for the type of fishing i do not very offen. marcum uses these points all the time for me vexlar is the workhouse of the 2 and will always get my vote I have a unit that is over 20 years old used in boat and ice yes it finally failed me the brushes went out i could of had it repaired for $100 but with no noise reduction on that unit so i replaced it with another Vexlar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotspotter Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Last year i did a survey on 3 forums and received 60 reply's. 40 were marcum users and 20 were vex users. Only one vex user was a previous marcum user (switched due to faulty unit). 30 of the marcum users were prior vex users and would not go back. Interesting how that played out. They all stated that the marcum was easier to read and easier to use.Just a previous observation. This survey, while unofficial, is also as unbiased and representative of the general ice fishing population as any I’ve seen. There’s some interesting insights here that reflect my own personal experiences as well as the general evolution of flasher technology.My first ice fishing flasher was a Humminbird super sixty with a “T” shaped wooden ice arm to which the ducer was taped to. I quickly moved up in the world to a Lowrance 2330, then a venerable Vex FL-8, followed by an FL-18. 5 years ago now, I purchased a Marcum LX-3, then an LX-5, and haven’t looked back since. Not that my purchases are “buyer’s guides,” but I do think they reflect an evolution in technology from those very first single color flashers. I’m of the opinion that Vexilar’s 20+ year old technology is but a stepping stone in the overall process, comparable to a host of technical advancements that we see in any product. Not that this is bad, or that they won’t help you catch more fish, but in any market, technology comes a long way in that amount of time. Using the Vex for as many years as I did, I’m in the more than ¾ majority that have used both and would never go back. At first, I didn’t know why they outperformed the Vex’s, I only knew that they were more sensitive, the signals were crisper, and the adjustable zoom was wonderful. Over the years, after learning more about the engineering of the unit and the multitude of revolutionary advancements built basically from scratch, I’m more of a fan than ever. Power isn’t a gimmick. It’s a staple of any successful sonar operation. With more than 30 years combined military and defense industry sonar expertise, the Marcum engineers have designed powerful sonar systems before. These guys are so intense, that Marcum now produces their own transducers in-house to avoid manufacturing defects and to ensure quality. While it’s true they had a ducer problem early on, this was a manufacturing defect with their old transducer manufacturer. Since Marcum has taken back this part of the manufacturing process, failure rates have been nearly zero. However, all the power in the world won’t do much good if the sensitivity of the receiver isn’t matched to all this horsepower. It’s why the Marcum’s lines are sharp and bright, not thick and distorted. It’s why the interference rejection is superior. Effectively, it’s a finely balanced unit that utilizes the power it has to the best of its ability.All of these details mean nothing to you, me, or anybody else until you can see how this performance translates into more and bigger fish. That’s the idea of the Marcum Challenge. It’s not a brag-session; rather, it’s an educational opportunity with no smoke/mirrors to see in an actual fishing situation, how all mfrs. units compare to one another. Marcum has nothing to hide and is proud of its technological advancements, which is why these won’t be mocked-up product demonstrations or infomercials. Instead, it’ll be experienced anglers helping to show you how to get the most information from your flasher. If you can zoom into the middle of a school of crappies and pick off the bigger fish at the bottom of the pack, you’re utilizing a feature that only Marcum offers. If you can separate a bottom hugging walleye from the rockpile you’re fishing, you can adjust your jigging rhythm to target him. You’re also using more than just a bottom zoom, but likely SuperFineLine which sharpens the target returns and creates better target separation. At the end of the day, more information means more fish. More and better features that are easier to use and understand mean more fish. More power and sensitivity, simply means, more fish. Joel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Seaguar Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 You really want to learn how flashers work, stare down the hole and have a flasher going at the same time. Guys get all hornied up about power and zoom, and glow in the dark miracle hoohah, when even the simplest flasher will show every fish. I cant tell you how many times my 10 yr old vex has shown a green line and it takes me forever to spot this tiny fry swimming around. Makes you wonder what they are thinking when this little thing is simming around your minnow. Flashers show fish that arent within sight in water 15' deep. The things are 8' from you bait when they show up on screen. We use flashers in concert with sight fishing, because it really saves the neck. It also told me the whole truth about flashers. Good Luck and dont waste any more money then you have to, gas might go back up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwtrout Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 These days you need to have a Marcum or Vex, old school and lower end sonars don't have interference filters and turn into nothing but a light show when either of the above are around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG DS Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 don't forget to take a good look at the new Hummingbird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 The features on the LX-5 have already been mentioned quite clearly but, for me, a regular weekend fisherman, I'm very satisfied with the LX-5's technology, features and quality. I think I got way more for my dollar since it comes standard with more features than other brands. The controls are simple to use and built right into the unit; no extra switch box or anything added on. While fishing close to other flashers, or on the edge of steep structure, the dual beam feature (NBT)is a benefit to me and gets used more than one thinks. The detail of the display is what I enjoy. The compact physical design helps when loading up the ATV cargo box, too, since I can stack the units. And, the flasher is well protected when hauling around. I usally have two boys with me and they each have their own LX-5 so, that's trhee units I have to haul. The Digital Charging System is an upgrade for most brands, too, and it's standard with a Marcum. The DCS has maintained the battery and that's a savings for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Loos1432404924 Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 They are both great units and have used them both, but personally I would have to go with Marcum. To have the ability to zoom in on a school of suspended crappies with the adjustable zoom or zooming in on walleyes that are tight to the bottom this feature is amazing. Not to mention when fishing deep water and having the ability to change your beam size. Also having the 12 mode interference rejection is crucial when fishing around other fisherman. In my opinion, having the most options available will always help you put more fish on the ice. If you have any additional questions you can always give me a call or stop by the Marcum High Power Challenge on Dec 20th on White Bear Lake and we can hit the ice and go over all the features. Either way you go, both units are great, but having more options and precise fine lines with the Marcum it will definitely put more fish on the ice for you this winter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARTER Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 Pros of the Vex and Marcum- Both are good units Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassislife Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 I've used LX-1, LX-5, fl-8 and fl-18 and they all get the job done fine, but if I had to chose one it would be the fl-18, no questions asked. The best unit for its price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainman Posted November 14, 2008 Share Posted November 14, 2008 More people should get a vexilar. That way there will be more fish left in the lake for me. Follow what I'm saying? LX-5 for me!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterHaven Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I have used both and hands down Marcum does circles around Vex when it comes to technology. I own the LX-3TC and will never go back to Vex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now ↓↓↓ or ask your question and then register. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.