Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
96trigger

ML first shot accuracy

10 posts in this topic

Ok, I never got my deer during the archery season, so I shot my new ML on Sunday, and absolutely loved it. I really thought it was a sweet little gun to shoot. However, when shooting the ML of a bench and rest, the accuracy degraded after 5 or so shots. The best shot was always the first couple of shots. However, I am leary about having a barrel with no fowling in it, Yet every shot I took with a clean barrel was right on target, and would degrade from there. When I put the gun away until ML season, I ran some bore butter down it, now I'm questionin where my first shot is going to be, I suppose I should shoot it again, and make sure, or is it going to be OK? Any opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know anything about smoke poles but I do know there's still over 7 weeks of archery season left! From reading your posts lately, sounds like the action is just starting to heat up. You're hanging in the towel already? eek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A MZ will always be most accurate the first or second shot after cleaning it. Mine is personally best the second shot but for me I found that just shooting a primer through it after cleaning it gives me two really good shots and the next two are close. After 4 shots I HAVE to use the bore blaster. Then I pop off another primer and I am good to go again.

Froggy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you cleaned you ML good yet? Notice how dirty it was? that is why consistency dwindels with each shot fired. they get so dirty.

and when you take a shot and reload it, you are jamming all of that junk in the barrel down into your powder charge, so it doesn't burn the same.

in a perfect patient world, one would clean the barrel after each shot, making sighting it in the most productive, but slow!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way to maintain consistency is to clean after each shot. If you know the first shot is right on than clean it and don't worry about it. If you shoot and then head in for lunch, clena it again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SNS, the action was heating up, but my primo ground is usually only good before the firearm season, it is basically state land and gets hammered for about 3 weeks, the deer won't even come out at night for another month. All I can do with that land is hope that a couple of the bucks that I've been seeing will make it through. I have some private land that I'm going to try and get on but right now there are relatives firearm hunting on their and thier is not a lot of room. I haven't actually put the bow away yet, There is one week between 3A and 3B where maybe a big guy will let down his gaurd.

My main question about the ML was if I should expect the first shot to be off because of the clean barrel. both my shotguns with rifled barrels need a fowling shot before they shoot accurately. If need be I could go out and shoot a round through it to fowl the barrel, but my first shots when "seasoning the barrel" and sighting in were always the best and I just wanted to know if that was normal. I have no problem cleaning the gun after every shot. I cleaned it thoroughly when I got home and cleaned the bore three times at the range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of muzzleloader do you have?

There is a new powder out that everyone is raving about as it leaves no residue but it only works in some guns and is a little more expensive that 777, Shocky Gold, Pinnacle......

It is called Blackhorn 209 and supposedly is non-corrosive, doesn't require swabbing, and is pretty much the best thing since they started putting beer in bottles.

I haven't tried it yet as I have some Pinnacle I need to shoot up but I will try it after that is gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a Remington Genesis, I really, really like the feel of the gun. It shoulders nice and is actually a pleasure to shoot. It feels like a rifle and I know that it will become one of my favorite guns. I am shooting 777, I have heard about the powder you are talking about and I hear it is the real deal. The triple 7 does fowl the gun up pretty good, after about 5 shots the accuracy really went to pot, then I cleaned it and it was right back to zero. For some reason right now, all the stores seem to be dumping the Remington Genesis guns. The ramrod is cheap and the paint is coming off it in numerous places but the rest of the gun is solid and well made. The Hornady SST Sabots really shoot nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Genesis should have no problem with the Blackhorn.

Cabelas has a sale on the Genesis now and they are running about $200. I know someone looking for a good priced muzzleloader and will mention this to him. Where is the paint chipping and what finish do you have on the gun?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The paint is only coming off the ramrod. Its an anodized aluminum rod so there really isn't any paint that will stick to it. the rest of the gun is solid and well built, has a great feel to it, and nice finish. I bought the synthetic stock with the stainless barrel for $200. Now Cabelas has the stainless barrel in camo for the same price with the rebate. Nice little gun, really like it for the most part, but I would assume that all the ramrods will be the same and will lose their paint after jaming it down the barrel for loading and cleaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Where did you hear that food plots were to be banned?   I have seen about banning "feeding deer"  which I took to mean the classic set up a feeder and dump corn and alfalfa in it.     Jumping on areas immediately has been shown to be successful in preventing isolated cases from spreading and becoming endemic.   Once it becomes established in the herd, it seems as if controlling it is no longer possible.   It also seems as if CWD is fairly hard to catch for a deer, or else it would be all over everywhere and all the deer in an area like Dane county would have it.    Oh, and the infected deer could have come from a deer farm, or from Iowa where it has been detected in the county bordering MN on the SE.    
    • I wouldn't call myself wealthy, but I've made good life choices that have enabled me to buy my own land.  Still pack my own lunch and watch for sales at the grocery store.  I don't own land in SE MN, I own land in northern MN.  The reason I am concerned is that this will serve as a template for herd control tactics in other parts of MN.  Understand that the game management agencies have conferences where they talk about managing hunters.  You don't have to look any further than the work of Dr. Gary Alt in Pennsylvania.    I can't put my finger on exactly what is going on with the results the DNR has presented.  Were the samples snuck in by a nefarious actor?  I wouldn't rule it out.  Was the disease always here and just finally discovered?  I don't see why not.  Is there a unique environmental reason that CWD hasn't gotten a broad foothold here?  It's possible.    If the agency had some credibility going into this, I'd be on board pounding kool aid myself, but they don't.  So color me skeptical.  None of the WI border counties along zone 3 have CWD according to this map.  However, Burnett and Polk do and there is no monitoring on our side up there.  Can a scientist explain that to me?  Because the geographic barriers up there are non-existent compared to  the Mississippi River along zone 3.       
    • I made the decision to replace the pump every few years rather than the carpet.
    • On my aluminum skid house I've been using thread cutting stainless steel screws from Fastenal
    • There might be a pleasant surprise in the works.   In the meantime, it is entertaining to watch anyway....      
    • Huh---Guess you must have the butthurt.
    • You are cooking it before you eat it right? I've only heard people using Cure when using dehydrators or may be for jerky when using burger. I have never used the stuff but don't like or make dehydrated jerky.   Seem to still be alive!
    • Creepworm, I am somewhat angry.  The reason it's fool hardy to consider food plots any more threat than a farm field is that the intentions of the planter don't change the flavor of the forage.  A food plot is no more attractive than the edge of a 160 acre bean field that meets a fence line, swamp edge, or grove.     Now imagine there are no farm fields or food plots at all, not even a decent yielding apple tree.  Deer will still communicate via scrape trees and licking branches during the rut.  If the current belief is that the prions spread via saliva, what's to stop wild deer from licking a branch that an infected buck has licked?  What's to stop a buck from rubbing their face all over a contaminated branch?    My fear is that lots of deer are going to be slaughtered in an area that just happens to have been a hot target for eradication before CWD was found.  I'm also worried we're going to get all kinds of bad rules imposed that won't do squat to actually stop the spread if the disease is actually in MN.  I'm worried we'll lose a critical habitat tool that allows us in harsh winter kill areas to help the deer make it through winter (food plots).    It'd be interesting to watch the DNR try to ban food plots.  Good luck defining what is and is not a food plot. 
    • Don't know how they got there.  Maybe they got confused with CWD and wandered up from Iowa.   Or maybe there are a few more but they didn't happen to get shot or didn't get tested.     So, you are a wealthy land owner?  Is the land in 348?     Sure, you are free to question the DNR.   I never said you weren't.   And you, so far as I know, are free to refuse to cooperate with the program to control CWD.   As I have said, that is exactly the response of the land owners in Wisconsin that I recall from back in the day.     However I am curious.   Are you accusing the DNR of planting or fabricating this instance of cwd for some nefarious purpose, like killing most of the deer in that area for unknown reasons?   Or do you just think that these were the only two sick deer and everything will be fine without any action? 
    • Nice product.  Would work great with my Lindell Ice Rigs....
  • Our Sponsors