Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
zamboni

Dear Santa:

142 posts in this topic

I would like a GPS for Christmas this year. I look completely lost on the field, which I usually am. If cost is a factor, I can split it with you, I just signed a HUGE contract, but I promise, I have been a real good boy this year.

Thanks!!

Aaron Rodgers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather have rodgers behind center for the vikes than Gus. I think every viking fan should be begging santa for a real QB so this teams talents aren't completly wasted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the $$$$ I would rather have someone other than Rodgers. That contract should have been offered after this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather have rodgers behind center for the vikes than Gus. I think every viking fan should be begging santa for a real QB so this teams talents aren't completly wasted

I'm just glad that Gus doesn't fall down in the end zone and cost his team the game. Free agency is a beautiful thing!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two safeties = 4pts

1 INT returned for a TD = 6/7.

I think I'm pretty good at math to figure out which one is the better option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But that pick six didn't cost them the game!! Could've should've but didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe the safeties were the cause of their loss either!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe the Packers scored many BECAUSE of Rodgers today-Gus had HOW MANY TD passes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take four points away from the home team and they lose. Take six away from the Pack and they still lose. Also the crowd is a huge factor and those safeties were big in getting fans excited. Erin got hit hard today and I really think that was the factor, he had a chance to prove himself with two minutes left but failed at something that Farv would have made look easy against our secondary. I'll say it again, AP played with some serious ferocity today and a the Pack's defense couldn't handle a real RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he had a chance to prove himself with two minutes left but failed at something that Farv would have made look easy against our secondary.

Huh? Did he not put them into position for a game winning FG?

I'll answer that for you, yes, he did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chester Taylor ran all over them, as well.

10 rushes for 29 yds. Yeah, he lit'm up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: gopher_nation
he had a chance to prove himself with two minutes left but failed at something that Farv would have made look easy against our secondary.

Huh? Did he not put them into position for a game winning FG?

I'll answer that for you, yes, he did.

If giving you kicker a 52 yard FG attempt is satisfactory, then yes. But angle of the kick and how much he missed it by (not much) and Rogers can get them, say five yards closer, that same kick is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: zamboni
Chester Taylor ran all over them, as well.

10 rushes for 29 yds. Yeah, he lit'm up.

You forgot about a catch he made. After these guys catch the ball, they run, see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still can't believe the whining about those safeties. Textbook safeties. Since when can anyone, especially the QB throw the ball forward underhand?? When it is done in the endzone, it is a safety, get a rulebook out. The refs called it right. Or they could have gone intentional grounding, he wasn't outside the tackles, the ball was 10 yards from the nearest guy and it didn't make it to the line of scrimmage. In the endzone, an intentional grounding is a safety. Either call was correct, but I think the better one was made.

He threw it underhand, and you guys are complaining about it, unreal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: LMITOUT
Originally Posted By: zamboni
Chester Taylor ran all over them, as well.

10 rushes for 29 yds. Yeah, he lit'm up.

You forgot about a catch he made. After these guys catch the ball, they run, see.

I didn't count the reception as that's not a run. Plus, throw that play out and he really didn't do all that much. I figure if we are throwing out plays such as INT's for TD's and punt returns for TD's to suit your argument, I can then ignore his long TD catch also. I can play too, see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when can anyone, especially the QB throw the ball forward underhand?? When it is done in the endzone, it is a safety, get a rulebook out. He threw it underhand, and you guys are complaining about it, unreal.

A forward pass is a forward pass. It doesn't have to be a conventional overhand throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets just face it, both teams are not that good! I would say yesterdays game looked about as good as game 1 this year. Just sloppy play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the explaination the ref gave of the first safety was pretty poor. i don't think it could have been an illegal forward pass, that would only come if it was already thrown forward and then it was thrown again, like a forward latteral.

The real call should have been explained as intentional grounding. It didn't appear that there was a reciever near where Rogers threw the ball so it doesn't matter if it it was overhand, underhand, behind the back, or between the legs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have said before I would rather watch the twins loose than the vikings win. were terrble and the teams we play arent that good either the NFL is all a bout money and stupid refs. Go Twins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: gopher_nation
he had a chance to prove himself with two minutes left but failed at something that Farv would have made look easy against our secondary.

Huh? Did he not put them into position for a game winning FG?

I'll answer that for you, yes, he did.

If you count 2 runs, a 3 yard pass and a tipped at the line, lucky it didn't get picked 19 yarder as a great drive than yeah, he got them in position. The most telling part of that drive, was sitting on it for a 50 yarder. No way they sit on that field position if Farve is back there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe the Packers scored many BECAUSE of Rodgers today-Gus had HOW MANY TD passes?

Ya Gus is fantastic (he's a marginal QB at best)crazy Rodgers should be chewing his O-line out for their performance.

The Packers secondary made some great plays. They do lead the league in INT's returned for TD's.

Special teams are a huge part of winning & losing football games as well. It's ridiculous to say "If they didn't return that punt for a TD...or If they didn't return that INT for a TD."

How about that phantom pass interference on Al Harris on a 3rd & 12??? The receiver ran into him and threw him aside....and a couple of marginal holding calls on GB's O'line. Aikman even commented on those penalties.

As bad as the Pack played, they still had a chance to win that game. The division could have a 3 way tie at 5-5 after this weekend. If the Giants keep winning, the purple will have an easy game with them. They won't play their starters for the last game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Reddit I believe   https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5i63d1/40_electoral_college_members_demand_briefing_on/db5or6d/?st=iy9h32qk&sh=3f2619dd  
    • Hillary and DWS didn't commit any crimes as difficult as that is to believe. Sketchy politics certainly, but what happens within a political party has no legal ramifications. The FBI already cleared Clinton of wrongdoing with regards to the email.   Flynn and other members of Trump's team are likely in violation of the Logan Act.
    • Well, if that happens then let the chips fall but do you think they will be arresting Hillary and DWS at the same time? If so it would be a good start.
    • I would wager the FBI arresting members of Trump's team, likely starting with Michael Flynn. Flynn made 5 phone calls to a Russian Ambassador on the day Obama imposed sanctions. Trump's team defended the 5 calls by stating Flynn was just wishing him Merry Christmas, which is odd because it was December 29th.   http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-eyes-michael-flynns-links-to-russia-1485134942    
    • Nick, so what are the top schemes the left plans to conjure up for impeachment?
    • Go Pats. They need one for the thumb.
    • And I am sure it will be a waste of server space You do understand that you just defined the meaning of the word conjecture don't you?     But there is conjecture so you have that  The only thing odd is that you are falling for the same type of fake news the Birthers fell for during the Obama years. Don't you understand you are quickly becoming the JV of libertopia?    Well, If you feel compelled then go ahead and forward your research to the proper authorities so they have a better chance at putting together the evidence to prosecute him because apparently without your insight they are not able to connect the proverbial dots. 
    • The dnc had russian propaganda that the russians hacked and released? Guess they provided the transparency the left is always so concerned about.
    • It's just a compilation of sources done on a public google drive. Pasting makes it searchable on this site.   https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLcl2gcA6O_SWN3WWM4WTlMZ2M/view
    • This warm front might help out
  • Our Sponsors