Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
slabchaser

If you could which one would you choose

19 posts in this topic

which one would you pick. a huge public area with a decent amount of pressure and a decent amount of deer. or a much smaller private area with little to no pressure but much less deer.

I would take the private area myself because I would rather sit all day without worrying about others in the hopes of seeing a decent deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me more deer, and more land.

I have had to make just that choice that last few years, and I have chosen the small parcel (35 acres) without many deer (lottery area, farm country). I am tired of seeing 8 does and maybe a spike buck on opening weekend, especially without a doe tag. Then to have to deal with neighbors that do drives on the their properties and have their wounded deer run onto my property. This year I will be heading North to join some friends on a huge mess of county, state, and federal lands. Also it should be nice to be able to move to the deer, instead of being stuck on a small parcel hoping the deer come to me.

I guess I am bow-hunting the heck out of the small parcel right now, and if I actually see a decent buck I may stay behind on opener, but I fully expect to be heading North this gun opener.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

much smaller private area with little to no pressure but much less deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smaller for sure....I hunt in SE MN and am not too particular in what I take, as long as it is mature. I just secured another 40 acres that is never hunted, with an outside chance of hunting the neighboring 40, that is never hunted either. All creek bottom and bluffs. with small plots of CRP, my fall is looking better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would Have to choose the private land with no pressure. If you sit all day,and the rut is on your odds of a buck coming through would be pretty goood. I just like to be out where I know someone else has not been stomping around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bigger for me, that is what I hunt to a T. I hunt a large area of public land, there are lots of deer and big bucks. My problem is that my season is short. When the guns fire, I'm done there, and then I move to my 40 acre private lot down in Wabasha. Lots of deer there too, just not all the big bucks. So actually, I guess it depends on what and when I am hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on Archery or Gun.. if archery, give me more land, if gun, give me the private, I dont trust people...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have said more land, but after the last 3 years I have decided to move to smaller private property. I had someone actually shoot my decoy on state land during archery season 3 years ago and 2 years ago I had a group of 2 guys get out of their truck and shot bird shot into the woods to drive the deer down the bluff to their buddies at the bottom. I got hit with all the bird shot as it rained down on me. I also had a group of 5 start a drive 100 yards away from me, pushing all the deer down the hill. I traded big buck country for 340 acres of private CRP. The CRP is broken into 40-100 acre plots up to 3 miles appart. It give me options, but like you said, you cannot control your neighbors either. The good thing is that we have had game cameras out for the last month and a half and have over 500 pictures of deer, up to 6 deer in one picture. The deer seem to be in the area, I just have no idea what the hunting pressure is going to be. I have two decent 8pts and one really tall 10pt. I don't think they are over 2 1/2 years old though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More land for me, I can usually find a spot further back than most are willing to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Small private for me, you can do a lot more with it, food plots, better chance of stuff not getting stolen, public land its like the lottery you never know whats gonna happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No question for me been deer hunting for 36 years, way to many so called hunters out there I dont care to be near safety first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im glad their were a lot of different views. my private land is in southern mn. shotgun zone which isnt all to appealing but its what I grew up hunting. but its along the little crow river bottom so there are some swamp bucks roaming. which brings me to my next question. my dad recently sold our 110 acre family century farm in NW iowa for about 3000 an acre. we are looking for some hunting land in mn. my dad wants some around mankato but I would rather go north. anyone have any suggestions for websites or other areas to find some land?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how much land you are talking about. 5000 acres public vs 40 or 80 private I would take the public every time. But if you up that private land to 200+ acres then I would go private every time.

As far as where to find land to buy I have no clue, but do your homework and look at a lot of land. I'm sure you will find something you will fall in love with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have hunted up north on big parcels of public land and am not going north this year instead I am hunting privalt land in the metro area so we will see what I like better........big land means alot of areas for the deer to roam........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the public land thing. I've been hunting public land in the metro for 10 years and have got deer 8 of those 10. Granted, only one of those deer was a decent buck but there are deer and I save a ton on gas money. It's more fun to study the movements of the other hunters and use that to your advantage!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definatly go for the bigger area. It is not hard to get back in the brush and away from the people. You also get many different food sources and terrain features you dont with smaller pieces. This way you can change your tactics throught the year. If you arent seeing the quality/quantity of deer you would like you can move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • MCI:   Sorry, but Waylon's only interests in life are ducks and my dirty laundry. I didn't start really getting into the shed hunting until recently so I didn't train him for it. I will probably do so with my next pup. He just tags along.   With the increase in popularity of shed hunting there is plenty of information out there. I know a few shed dogs and I know it's not as easy to get them excited about old bone then about a nice stinky duck, but definitely possible. The guys I know also compete in local shed competitions (staged courses) , so if you look into that type of thing there should be a group of guys with a lot of knowledge.
    • Trump is the enemy of the truth ! 
    •   Shouldn't be hard to come up with a way to fill a 1/4 inch gap, it seems to me.   Rip some strips of something, maybe even that synthetic decking, trex or something.    Then you could have the vinyl
    •   *marks "leech brings up someone's location as evidence their opinions are not relevant" on sillytown bingo card*   I'm one "big dave says you just don't understand freedom" away from a BINGO!
    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
  • Our Sponsors