Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

First grab shots with new lens

8 posts in this topic

New lens arrived today and I just went out in the yard to shoot a few and see if I got a clunker but the sharpness is there and I'm quite pleased with it so far.

I wanted a lens that would really reduce PP time in sharpening,etc. and luckily I made a good choice. VERY fast focusing!

I was stuck in a rut trying to get the 500/600f4 so I gave it up,but i did have enough saved for this lens and new extenders. I almost grabbed a 50D,but that would have pushed this lens back awhile and bodies come and go but good glass has staying power.

Hopefully,there will be some light tomorrow so I can try it with extenders.

These were shot handheld,iso 200,in-camera sharpness set at 1,Raw converted to jpg in DPP,cropped in photoshop-no other adjustments/sharpening whatsoever.

Canon 30D,300mm F2.8L IS

2970756086_4bd43a9024_o.jpg

100% crop of focus point to show detail-no sharpening added.

2969913227_9a2d4886df_o.jpg

I was amazed at the shallow DOF! The side of the apple is sharp,and toward the top,it gets out of the focus area. Like most images,it's hard to see the quality online but the color,contrast and sharpness are better than I expected. Very happy! [wife isn't] smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will love this lens MM! You can pick a 300 or 400/2.8 lens shot out of a crowd. I find I do virtually no sharpening with this lens in PP. Congratulations MM, and buy your wife some roses smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you will be very happy with this lens, and the good news is that the wife eventually got used to it! May be Canon's sharpest lens. Looking forward to more images!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks man. I'm stuck putting in her new dishwasher this weekend,so the lens may not even escape from the gun safe! crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL or buy her a dishwasher, whatever it takes. Really it will be worth it. I can't imagine not having this lens!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see you got the sweetie, MM. Good job! gringrin

One note: Setting in-camera sharpness in the 30D's picture styles won't impact a RAW capture. Picture styles settings only affect a jpeg capture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see you got the sweetie, MM. Good job! gringrin

One note: Setting in-camera sharpness in the 30D's picture styles won't impact a RAW capture. Picture styles settings only affect a jpeg capture.

Thanks bud. If what you say is right,then there is really no sharpening at all? not even the +1 in camera? That would be very re-assuring as to the lense's ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM, Canon in-camera picture style settings (sharpness, saturation, contast, etc) only apply to jpegs. RAW images are unaffected.

However, when opening a RAW in DPP, DPP will automatically adopt whatever picture style settings you've chosen in-camera to initially display the image.

Here's how it's been described to me: "The picture style you choose has no effect on the RAW data. It simply tells Canon's software (DPP) to choose that picture style when it first displays that file for you. It's letting you do your own JPG or TIF conversions more quickly by trying to predict in advance the picture style you are most likely to use when the time comes to "develop" the file. That's all. No matter what settings you choose in camera, a Canon RAW file is a RAW file, entirely unaffected by those in-camera choices."

When choosing a picture style in DPP to convert a RAW to a TIF or a JPEG, "neutral" is the one that seems to deliver the least manipulation, according to my reading.

BTW, I'm rapidly moving away from RAW capture. My latest reading indicates that with today's technology, there's so little difference in the quality of a large print 16-bit RAW capture vs an 8-bit jpeg capture that the eye can barely tell them apart. I haven't experimented with large prints RAW vs jpeg for a couple years (the difference was noticeable then), and I'm willing to believe what the print lab pros are saying. Plus, with CS3 you can take a jpeg and "develop" it using the same type of RAW preview screen available only with RAW images in previous versions of Photoshop. I'll be upgrading to CS3 or CS4 soon. I haven't shot RAW for two months and likely won't any more.

And when shooting jpeg I minimize all saturation, contrast and sharpening on the in-camera picture style settings so I retain control of those characteristics in post-processing. In the 30D picture styles, that would be "neutral" or "faithful."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Those sure are pretty snowflakes..........
    • Misguided by love as pure as the driven snow.  
    •   Yep, am with ya......and most of us thank you. Should not be a difficult concept to understand.....except for a select Jv few.
    • So was I.  When I say "my equipment" won't be freezing up when I am hole hopping with the aid of my toasty warm Otter cottage, part of my equipment that won't be freezing up would be the ez ducer...   
    • Reinhardt was sincere, and I don't believe he was trying to sell anything,  He had a lot of knowledge about meat, and simply wanted to share it.   I didn't fault him for his politics, either.  He was simply misguided on that....        
    • I took Mickey in 2008. Bubbles 4 years later. Not too worried about winning as some on here .....as winning in  those years wasn't really winning, and so far, neither is picking the winner in 16, other than saying you picked the winner and "get it".
    • Had an opportunity to tag along with LeeKen to Bluestem Nature Conservancy and sit in a blind Saturday morning.  Thought it was unusual to see a deer with antlers late March.
    •     I was thinking more like Goofy=Pres. Trump
    • Murphy’s Law   I went out this afternoon trout fishing.  I questioned the wisdom of fishing on a robin’s egg blue sky day.  Trout shun sunlight.  I went outside to check the weather. The warmth of the afternoon coaxed me out of the house.     I fished a stretch I have done well on in the past.  I knew because of the bright sun I would more than likely not do well on big trout this outing.  Trout do not have eye lids and shun bright sun. When I got to the stream the outdoor temperature was 58 degrees.  I took the water temperature and it was almost 50 degrees.  That is well within a good temperature range to score some trout.     I hit the water at 2:45pm.  The sun was high in the sky and not a single cloud was in the sky.  I knew from experience that days like these I typically fished the shaded side of the stream.  There was no shaded side of the stream.      The fishing was tough.  I had lots of follows and flashes at my lure.  None seemed to want to commit.   I decided to look for cover for the trout.  I decided anything to throw a little shade on the trout would make them feel comfortable.     The trout had lock jaw.  I decided to target broken water so the trout would feel secure and come out in the bright light.  They still were bashful.  I decided another trick was in order. I was going to throw in the biggest snarly messes and let the lure drop to the bottom and give it a tweak to start the blade going.  Bang bang and I was in business.  This only worked in deep runs and i lost a few lures throwing into the mess.     I ended the outing with 24 brown trout to hand. The biggest was about 16 inches.  It was 5:30pm.  I usually get out at a bridge and today was nothing different.  I stood on the bridge looking upstream.  There was a sweet log jam just upstream of the bridge and it was in shadows.     I decided i was going to go just upstream in the shadows and cast a few more times. I was still on the bridge looking upstream. I looked at my reel and there was a loop on the spool.  This loop needed to be cast out if I was going to continue fishing.  I decided the bridge afforded the best angle and no trees in the way to cast out the loop in my spool.     I cast off the bridge.  The loop caught and dropped my cast about 15 yards upstream.  It nearly didn't land in the water.  It hit tight to the bank and I had a big snarl in my reel.  I looked down and saw my panther martin was barely in the water.  I decided to pull off some line and get this snarl out.  I made even a bigger mess.     I sat down on the bridge rail and started to mess with my giant snarl.  I again looked at my lure and it was barely in the water.  I was worried about losing the lure because of the snarl.  It was safe and barely dangling in the water.     I  really made a mess with the reel.  I was cussing it and trying to untangle it.  I lost focus on my lure in the water. I was peering over my glasses and really putting all my attention on this mess and I heard a splash sound.  I looked upstream and saw nothing.  I looked back at the reel.  I heard a louder splash and looked over the bridge at my lure suspended in the water.     My mouth dropped open wide and I stared in disbelief.  Me messing with the line caused the lure to jig up and down in the water.  This attracted a predator.  Not 2 inches from my lure was a giant trout suspended and staring at the size 9 gold panther martin deluxe waiting for it to move again.     My reel was still messed up so there was no battling this huge female trout on my reel if it decided to quit dancing with my panther martin and eat it. The bridge was at least 15 feet off the water and the idea of battling a monster trout from above was not appealing.  I worked frantically on the snarl.  It got even more messed up.     My fighting with this reel and keeping one eye on the giant female was nerve racking.  She still was very interested in my lure.  She circled it like a shark.  It was more than I could stand.  I decided if I hooked up with her with this less than optimal circumstances I would lose her and maybe kill her because of the bridge nonsense.     I decided to try to catch her another day.  The reel was non functional and i grabbed the line and lifted the lure out of the water.  What happened next is going to be relived in my dreams for the rest of my life.  The monstrous female brown bum rushed the lure as I lifted it out of the water.  It launched itself out of the water snapping at the spinner.  It was a swing and a miss. I got my wits back together and thought about cutting out the snarl and trying for her. I decided a return trip was on the agenda.  As I write this recollection I smile and cuss my circumstances.
  • Our Sponsors