Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
96trigger

Mn Recognized as on of USA's Sweetest Spots for Whitetails

43 posts in this topic

Before I go into this, I want to say that I understand that Minnesota is large and very diverse geographically. I know that this is a very small portion of Minnesota but it does go to show that the DNR is doing its job. Maybe this will shed a little light on what I have been saying on here quite often, and that is that Minnesota has big bucks, the DNR should not mandate what we can and cannot shoot. They are doing the best job they can, and I believe that it is working.

OutdoorLife, November 2008, pg 26, "Sweetest Spots"

by Andrew McKean

"Five wooded corn-belt counties (2 in Mn, 2 in Wis, one in Iowa) in the heart of the Midwest maybe the best big buck factories you have never heard of... these jursidictions are poised to defend their title as the unheralded home of outsize whitetails

Houston County is Minnesotas third-most prolific producer of typical racks, followed closely by Fillmore County.

So why haven't you heard of thes deer factories? Largely because they'veearned their status the old fashioned way, with quality management that promotes harvest, not restrictive access.

Thats contrary to trends in whitetail country that suggest that trophy production depends on intense manipulation of genetics, age structure and sex ratios, cultivation of boutique food plots and drum tight hunting access"

If Houston and Fillmore are 3 and 4 on the list, that leaves two more counties with big bucks. Wabasha, Winona, and Olmstead all have their share also.

We wanted bigger bucks, I've been saying that we have them and that we don't need the national recognition, now we have it. We are getting what we wish for but at what cost? I can see the day when it will cost the average person big dollars to hunt on property in Minnesota. This will take us back to the days when only the rich were able to hunt, and the poor had to fend for themselves. I would prefer to be able hunt and have a once in a lifetime chance at a buck, than make hunting in general, a once in a lifetime event. It was only a matter of time before some places in Minnesota got that recognition. For those of you that don't think it will effect you because you are a long ways away, where do you think some of the misplaced hunters will go when outfitters and guides lease up the land so that they can take your hard earned money for what you used to be able to do with a door knock and a hand shake.

Enough of my soap box, let the discussion begin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theres no big deer in MN, everybody knows that. . . EVERYBODY GO TO IOWA AND ILLINOIS !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ha minnesota? we have 80 acres near hackensack and we arent even goin up there for opener bcuz the last couple years have been horse sh!t. when you sit from sun up to sun down for 3 days and dont even see a deer? come on somin is wrong w/ that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston County is Minnesotas third-most prolific producer of typical racks, followed closely by Fillmore County.

I read the above as Houston County is the third best in MN. How does it rank nationally? How does the state rank nationally?

The best listing I've seen is a map of P&Y and B&C bucks produced from 1996-2005. A couple counties in MN do well but in general the state doesn't rate well.

I'd post the link but it would probably get ripped out. So Google Boone & Crocket Pope & Young 1996-2005 and take a look yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always say if you dont like the hunting here gor somewhere else that leaves more deer for the rest of us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea stick to Iowa or go to canada we dont have deer here. I looked at that map, Wisconsin is nothing but red.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever think it may be the terrain that produces those trophy deer and not the well planned out strategy of our DNR? If the DNR has such a good handle on things why arent the other 100 counties worth a [PoorWordUsage]? Bucks over 3 1/2 are few and far between in most of the state, and if it werent for the bluff country along the river, the suburban refuges in the metro, or the miles of inaccessable land in the north, I would bet it wouldnt be any better there either. Thats why we have some big deer, not the outstanding efforts of our DNR.

Hunting other states seems to be the only option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never seen anything but a spike down there. whistle
same here southern MN corn fed deer are tiny. The only big deer down here are green and yellow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't that long ago when this area didn't have large deer, it definitely didn't have the numbers, or quality. SEMN was a lottery zone. We used to be lucky to see a deer. The terrain has been there for tens of thousands of years. How do you explain that?

But you are right about one thing, hunting out of state might be your best option. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The SE isn't an accurate portrayal of the state as a whole. You have a few glacier free counties that extend into WI & IA that produce year after year. The size has always been there, but numbers were lacking. The DNR has helped increased the population. I'm pretty sure MN isn't even among the top 5 big buck producing states anymore. I will say it's nice to live and hunt in a state that's not being bought up with leases and provides plenty of public land opportunities. You start talking with the locals from KS & IA and come to realize it's not all it's cracked up to be with everything becoming leased. Heck, even out-of-state guys that own land in IA can't hunt their own property every year. First you have to be drawn and then pay for a $400 license! MN nonresident deer tags have got to be the cheapest in the midwest. (Small bucks don't cost much) grin I'm happy with what we got, someday I'd like to pay an outfitter is Buffalo county so I can experience a quality rut hunt at least once with mature deer and healthy buck-to-doe ratios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SNS, I know that SE isn't an accurate portrayal as a whole, but the Southeast portion of the state does have nice bucks, as does the big Northwoods. I think thats roughly half, if not at least a 1/3 of the state thats producing nice bucks. I do feel for the ones out west and even up north where the deer population has gotten out of whack and there aren't the numbers, or quality of deer. That would definitely suck too. Time is needed, the deer population is not static, it is dynamic, therefor, changes need to be made on a regular basis. What the DNR has done down here has worked. We didn't have ALL those deer 10-15 years ago.

Thanks for acknowledging the fact that being a hotspot for big bucks is not all its cracked up to be. I just about crapped when I saw the article in the magazine, and that is no small publication either. I was just thinking, "Great, here it comes" I'm sorry that I may seem a little bit bitter, Two of my main farms have both been approached about getting leased. If the farmers weren't relatives saving it for their family, unlike some of their neighbors, I would be pushed on the state land like a lot of other people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as getting the word out, I think that TV may be a bigger factor than magazines. I am another one that doesn't believe that more big bucks running around is all it is cracked up to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

alls i know is where i live there sure aint many big bucks and thats in west central MN, would i like to shot a big one yes would i like to see a big one once a year yes! but it just doesnt happen I've hunted for 8 years since i was old enough to and in my area i havent seen one buck that would score over 130 and to be honest i've prolly seen 2 that would score in the 120's. I hunt flat farm land with creek bottoms and every deer that lives in the area gets chased after. Do i shoot deer, yes i've harvested one every year and for me its still very enjoyable even though none are giants and most are baldies! I know i will prolly have to put in many years to shoot a dandy buck and i hope someday to do so. I guess hearing that MN is a hot spot just surprises me but maybe in other areas things are alot different. I dont want MN to be full of outfitters nor do i want to have to pay 200+ $ every year for a tag. So i guess for this guy im ok with what we have. I like surprises and if someday i get that one chance and a big brute does stand infront of me i guess it was just ment to be and i will charish it alot more then if it happened every year. As long as i have a place to hunt and can enjoy the outdoors i think we should all be great ful for that. just my 2 cents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We hunted Houston County for 8 years. We got our deer but no big racks. Not even a shot at a big buck. Recently Hokah was in the news for a huge rack, it made the news because it was a rare thing. There are some big bucks but not many. The Metro area has many more big bucks than any other area in Minnesota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the biggest deer I have ever seen were in Winona County. As a kid I worked on a farm in that area, you would not believe the deer you see when you are on a tractor doing felid work. But when it comes to hunting season the only time you see them, if you do, it’s well out of shotgun range. Bluff country is tuff to hunt, IMO the herd size can be acquainted to Good genetics, Good nutrition, And pore hunter success.

I have seen more 14 point plus deer hanging down there then any of the big woods county. You can keep your nasty tasting, pine cone eating, north country deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can keep your nasty tasting, pine cone eating, north country deer.

Sorry, I thought that was funny. laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, thats why I bow hunt, I think it improved my odds of seeing one of those big bucks, and along the way, I became addicted to it. Once the shotgun season starts, they run and hide and don't come back out until December. Lots and Lots of places to hide in the bluffs, The terrain changes so much, you could be close to one and never know it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Captain Fireman, I agree with you. Good genetics, and good food are the biggest positive variables.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the shotgun season starts, they run and hide and don't come back out until December. Lots and Lots of places to hide in the bluffs, The terrain changes so much, you could be close to one and never know it.

Thats why I only hunt the ML season now. And the nuckelhead facter is less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Captain Fireman
You can keep your nasty tasting, pine cone eating, north country deer.

Sorry, I thought that was funny. laugh

I just read your post. Now thats funny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

96trigger,

I,m not to far from you. I'm just on the other side of the White Water Demilitarized zone whistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the guns come out, I run for the safety of Wabasha County. It just crawls with hunters over the firearm season. It literally sounds like a warzone on opening day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • You be lucky if there isn't a nest in the seat, and pee all over the carpet....
    • If one were measuring the debt in constant dollars instead of nominal dollars, 5% inflation reduces it by 5% of the $20 Trillion.  That is a trillion dollars.    Is that hard to understand?   Debt is only significant in relation to GDP and ability to pay.   Consider a thought experiment.   You own a thousand dollar 30 year treasuries paying 3% which is the current going rate.   So the government owes you 30 dollars a year, and a thousand dollars in 2046.   If inflation were to increase to 5%, the value of your thousand dollars goes down by 50 dollars per year.   In 2046 you get 1000 dollars which is equivalent to $215 today.   Which is a bigger problem to pay, the $1000 that you are complaining about or the $215 that actually gets paid?      Inflation has its problems but it also fixes debt concerns.  
    • So the Pence thing wasn't at a local level?   That what you were saying?     And the difference between subsidizing out of state folks and in state folks is?  Johnson subsidized the california folks coming to new mexico for a few weeks, and pence is subsidizing, by a factor of 7 less, local people keeping their jobs.     Got any numbers as to how many jobs for how long created by the Johnson hand out to Hollywood? 
    • Some other small detail items before I get to the finished pics of the entire house.   Each bench has a built in UV jig glow light.  You never have to worry about finding your keychain light (or the dead battery they always seem to have) again!   The normal bench cushion back always seems to be falling down.   I had each cushion sewn with a tab, and then installed a grommet and a hook on the wall.       On the back side of each wheel well is a rod storage compartment for 4 rods, an ice scoop, a forceps, and a few small hooks for miscellaneous stuff.   I mentioned the under cabinet and under bunk lighting in another post, but here it is in action.   And another view of my charging cabinet, with rattle reel storage.   That's all for now.  Finished pics soon!
    • I've had others, but I am a Bushnell fan.
    • Version #1 of the lift bed was a marvelous failure.  Everything looked great while building and installing it.  It was probably the most precise piece I've ever built.  The trouble was multi dimensional binding, as was pointed out in an earlier post.     Version #2 works well.  The strut channel and trolley works great, and doesn't allow any binding. You still want to lift or lower evenly, but it is really forgiving.     This is set up with 4 locking positions.  2 storage, and 2 sleeping.  I expect this to become the most frequently used bed in the house, rather than dropping the table down all the time.    The extra head room with this in its highest position is wonderful!  It isn't a direct replacement for pushing a button on the Happi Jac, but at about $1900 less, it'll work very well.  
    • This will be a bit long winded, but by far the most frequent question I get is how to wire these.  I'll try to detail as best I can.     Starting from the outside of the house I have a regular 30amp RV plug, similar to this:   From this plug I have a heavy duty 10/2 wire running to my converter, which is a Progressive Dynamics PD4045.  The nitty gritty details can be found with a search, but to summarize, it powers all your AC components, and converts AC to DC power, and charges any batteries.     My only AC components are outlets, the heating element for the electric part of my water heater, and a future expansion for a roof mount air conditioner.  Everything else is DC, and I don't use inverters (which would be used to convert 12v battery power to AC).  My reasoning is that the inverters are generally inefficient, and I have a Yamaha generator that will run over 14 hours on a gallon of gas.  That equates to about $6 per weekend with the amount I use it.             AC wires from the power panel include 10/2 to both the future air conditioner, and the water heater.  All outlets are 12/2.   I also have 10 gauge wire running from the panel to my (2) 6 volt GC2 (Sam's Club) golf cart batteries.  These are connected in series with a very heavy duty 0 gauge cable to make 12 volts.     The DC side is a bit more complicated to explain.  I have it set up in 2 categories.  (1) would be frequently used or higher draw components powered directly by the converter, each on their own fuse in the power panel.  This includes furnace, interior lights, exterior lights, ceiling fan, hydronic pump, sink pump, water heater ignition, stereo, and hole lights.  These all have a + wire from the converter to wherever the switch is located, and then continuing on from the switch to wherever the main power wire is for each component (more on this later).           Behind the converter I have a simple metal grounding bar to make all the - connections, and I have one main - wire running back to the batteries, and also grounded to the frame.         Category (2) are less frequently used, or very low power draw, or items with their own switch.  I have classified these as "always on".  This includes my two front exterior lights (so I can flip them on from the outside of the house), tv antenna, roof vents, rear bunk overhead lights, under cabinet lighting, range hood, etc.  These are all powered from the converter on a single fuse (20 amp).   So that brings me to the bathroom wall.  Knowing that the connections are by far the most likely failure point, I want to minimize the number of hidden connections buried by the spray foam.  Each light or fixture has its own separate wire to either the power panel, or my connection point in the wall.  This was taken before I got everything tidied up for spray foam, but you can see the plywood panel in the bathroom wall.         The other side of it now looks like this:    All the wires are brought down from the ceiling through the bathroom wall, with the connections made here.  You can see each has a + and - terminal bar, and then there is one other main grounding bar at the bottom, with a heavy 10 gauge - wire that runs back to the batteries and is also grounded to the frame.   So that's wiring in a nutshell!        
    • Looks like the rust belt should of went with a better rustproofing package.........     Donald Trump may have positioned himself as the champion of American workers but Republicans on the Hill are already embracing his “do as I say, not as I do” modus operandi. Under the backing of Paul Ryan, the GOP leadership stripped a provision from a water bill Monday that would have required American-made iron and steel products to be used in infrastructure projects in Flint and elsewhere funded by the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). Democratic Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown blasted Republicans, who removed the “Buy America” provision (which passed the Senate with strong bipartisan support) while the House and Senate were reconciling the bills. In other words, GOP leadership scrapped it behind closed doors. “By stripping meaningful Buy America rules from the water infrastructure bill, Washington leadership is choosing China and Russia over Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin,” said Brown. “This was the first major test of whether Washington establishment Republicans would live up to President-elect Trump’s promises to put American products and American workers first – they failed, and American iron and steel workers will pay the price.” Now, Brown is teaming up with Democratic Sens. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania to insert the provision back in the bill. They want to reattach the provision to a nearly $12 billion Water Resource Development Act (WRDA), which authorizes dozens of infrastructure projects around the country and is on track to pass the House this week. “I’m not giving up on this fight,” Baldwin said in a telephone interview Tuesday. “Why would we pass a bill that only benefits Russian and Chinese steel corporations when we could be providing certainty to American manufacturers of steel and iron?” That sentiment was shared by some steel worker groups earlier this week: “From our end it’s a little baffling,” said Roy Houseman, a legislative representative for the United Steelworkers. “It’s been a program that’s been really successful, and it has bipartisan support. We’re just very confused by the Speaker, who’s not listening to the rest of his caucus.” In essence, “Buy America” sounds as nice to Republicans as it did to Trump, but in practice they would rather preserve the "Buy Chinese" option that Trump uses to build his skyscrapers.
    • If there are any twins fans left, I wonder if these new young bucks running the club have asked mauer if he would lift his no trade clause?  I think we know the answer.  I find it interesting to watch these winter meetings trades etc but we are never involved.  It seems like we are missing something as fans.
  • Our Sponsors