Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dairyman

panasonic

5 posts in this topic

I was pretty much set on buying the panasonic lumix Z-8. 8 meg with 5 x zoom. That was until I started reading some of the consumer comments on it. Poor blurry pictures,poor response time between flashes,I mean while I know its not top of the line I certainly don't want to deal with those issues either. What do you guys think. Any input would be appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about that camera but I sure like my Canon S2 IS. Lots of options on it. SX10 IS should be here Wednesday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen some mixed reviews on the Lumix too. I know a guy that has one and really likes it.

I've owned quite a few point and shoots, and the last one I went with a Canon (A540 or something like that). Very impressed with it. I take it out fishing with me all the time, it gets beat around in my fishing bag, dropped on the floor of the boat, had been covered in fish slime, and still puts out a good picture.

My next one will be a Canon for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't used that particular Lumix, but have had two others, the FZ 1 and FZ 30. In good light they can take very good photos, in less than great light the shots get grainy and noisy very quickly.

The flash on the FZ1 was weak, just about useless past about 5 feet. The FZ30 was better, but nowhere near as good as an external flash. I don't think any built in flash will keep up with burst shots, I don't remember any problem with the flash refresh time in non burst situations.

The shutter lag can be annoying, it seems to be at least a 1/2 a second between pressing the release and the shot actually being taken. It may not sound like much but it can drive you nuts.

The first two digital cameras I owned were Olympus cams (way back in the 90's), and they were great at the time, very sharp pictures and nice color. If I were going to get a P&S today I would look at them again, the Olympus SP 560 or 570 are in a similar price range as the Panasonic Z8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a Lumix FZ7 for over a year now and really like it. I don't use the flash much, so can't comment there, other than most cameras onboard flashes don't have much reach. As far as shutter lag is concerned, my research indicated that it was almost twice as fast as the Canon equivalent. It sounds to me like different models fare better than others. You can check out the reviews of the FZ7 on Amazon, I would imagine. Anyway, I'm happy with mine and have got some sellable shots with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • DOILIES. Those thing on yer man-cave table tops. So that's a pic of DOLLY, huh? Smurf 's ol' gal friend?       
    • The first piece that Golden State might be losing is Andre Iguadala. Would love to see the wolves grab him.
    •   Sure anytime. But, it kind of sounded above you were over Dollies?  Or was that Dolly's?  
    • With all the moist and cool weather, the slugs are having a feast on our garden plants.  My wife asked me to look over some plants that the insects were destroying.  Upon inspection, this is what we found - slugs.  The vegetables treated with slug bait were fine.  It was the flowers, asters, marigolds, pole beans, etc. that were untreated and weakened by some hail were experiencing a slow death.  Check this photo out of the slugs.  These were white like extra large maggots.  They are all treated and coming back strong.
    • WOWZER what a beast!!!!!!!!!!! that DNR  biologist, Mero, i had a talk with him he did the creel survey on our little lake up in itasca county, odd that he would comment about mille lacs since he was out of the grand rapids DNR  office!!!!!! good guy though!!!!!!
    • Crud. I knew that would come back on me. I'll haveta head up to leeches and borrow some of his table doilies. 
    • http://www.startribune.com/monster-muskie-found-on-mille-lacs-exceeds-state-record/431203243/
    • And that's the key...it takes a guy or two to step back from the max deal and take a pay cut to keep this type of talent together. In the NFL, the Patriots are a dynasty because Tom Brady is smart enough to take far less than he'd command on the open mark to stay put with a great coach and build weapons around him...he values rings (aka, his legacy) more than a few more dollars. If GS can do that, they will be relevant for a very long time.
    • nope it didnt!!!!!!!!!
    • IDK, people pick apart the Hanzal/White trade as a mistake, but I don't. I think it was totally worth the shot to make a solid push. Going in everyone who did any analysis knew the first round was going to be full of 2nd round talent so losing a 1st rounder this year wasn't giving up much. I also don't think Fletch should make a trade for the sake of making a trade either. That is a desperation move and not one fueled by focusing on getting the team better. I would be shocked if someone like Scandella isn't moved in order to make room from Granlund, Nino, etc. We are really tight now with the guys we want to keep and have a few holes to fill beyond that so something has to give.
  • Our Sponsors