Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Ryan_V

Lasik

14 posts in this topic

Anyone here have lasik done? I've made my appointment for January and not sure what to expect. my vision is pretty bad and my eyes have become intolerant to contacts. I checked a couple places and ended up making a surgery date at Fischer Laser Eye Care Center in Willmar. Just wasn't impressed with Lasik plus, felt more like a number coming through the door than a patient. I'm actually doing the "epi-lasik". let me know your experiences (good OR bad).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

had it done 4 years ago and it is still working I had the mono vision done. one eye for close and one for far away stuff. best money i ever spent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've thought about it, but the drawback for me was when I was told that after 40 years old your vision naturally deteriates. Even if lasik was done I would still need reading glasses eventually. In my opinion, that is defeating the purpose of getting the procedure done. My brother who is over 50 had the procedure done but still needs reading glasses. Also, I found out that the worse your vision is the more expensive the procedure is. So don't think the price they advertise will be what you pay. I think lasik is a good deal the younger you are because the benefit lasts longer with no aid from reading glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why I didn't like lasik plus. the place I'm going said the "graduating scale" for payment based on your vision is [PoorWordUsage]. it's all the same, the machine is just set differently. I know I'll need reading glasses eventually, but that worth it for getting rid of my glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the best decisions I ever made. I got mine done at TCL in Edina, 4 years ago.

I didn't have horrible vision, but enough that I needed contacts or glasses. I think I was around 70/20 or something like that.

I figure, for the price you pay; add up glasses/contact prescriptions for x number of years, and add the freedom of not having to mess around with glasses or contacts.

I say go for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw an ad today in the Strib- $495. Wife paid $1300 5 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had mine done in Canada 9 years ago. My eyes were like -6 to -7. The best thousands bucks I ever spend. I just turned 40 and my last annual checkup showed 20/20 in one eye and 20/15 they other. I couldn't be any happier. Go for it......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the mono vision done on my eyes a year and a half ago. whoa baby 20/20 vision now. By all means get the procedure done !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the best decisions I've ever made. Had mine done about 7 yrs ago in St. Cloud. Been seeing great without any troubles since and no more contacts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had it done seven years ago. Was a very good result for awhile. I'm back to wearing glasses again, albeit a low power lens compared to seven years back. My vision requirements have changed and the correction done with the laser is no longer correct. I do not wish to have a second procedure done if it only lasts 5-6 years. You may have a better outcome, Good Luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seven years of great eye sight and no glasses. I do need expensive sun glasses, your eyes are more light sensitive. Eye drops because the eyes seem dryer. I'm a System Analyst and use computers 10-12 hours daily and that requires reading glasses. Outdoors, hunting and fishing I only wear sun glasses as needed. Great investment. Remember to get your drivers license changed right away or if stopped for any reason they want to give you a ticket for not wearing your glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had Lasik done on one eye nine years ago. I use my other eye for reading and the Lasik eye for seeing distances. Works great for me. I just hated those glasses when I was hunting or fishing in the rain. Don't be fooled by the advertised price because you will find that if you want the newest most advanced procedure it will be more. When dealing with your eyes its pretty easy for them to convince you to upgrade. The only time I ever regretted it was on the drive home the first day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on how old you are. One of the unfortunate realities of life is that as we age our eyes are no longer able to change focus from near to far as easily as when we were young. When you have the Lasik procedure done, your eyes are fixed at a narrow range of focus, ie; "far sight". If you had difficulty with near objects like reading, you will absolutely need reading glasses after the procedure. Another comment above is that it does not last forever, which has been my experience. I had the procedure done when I was 47 and it didn't work "quite right", so they needed to do it again. I still could not see very well out of my left eye and my near focus was totally screwed up. That was 6 years ago and I now am having difficulty with some things. Low light levels like night driving or trying to tie a knoe in fishing line are difficult.

Overall, I don't know if I would do it again considering my circumstance. If you are 20 years old it is probably a great investment, but if you are to the point where bifocals are mentioned in your prescription I would think twice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had mine done 7 years ago at age 40, my vision was -4 and since then I am at 20/15 and 20/20. I do not need reading glasses and when I am outdoors I can see perfect, it was the best money I ever spent, don't worry about your age I know people older than me that had it done and they came out with great results. The best thing to do is find out from people who have had it done at the clinic your going to, each one has different equipment and you should also find out if an optometrist is doing the surgery or a doctor who is a eye specialist. I had mine done by the doctor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors