Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
rage2blade

short a2a bows

Recommended Posts

today i was doing some researching on the internet on bows and i proceeded to read about how short axel to axel bows will not perform as good in long range distance than one of which is much longer. It also said that they are harder to consistantly shoot the same and since most have a shorter brace height they will not be as forgiving. is there alot of truth to this or is more of someones opinion? the only reason i ask is becasue im interested in the matthews DXT and that does have a very short 29.75 a2a length and a 7 inch brace height which is shorter than my last bow. I guess this got me thinking if a short a2a length made that much of a difference then why is every brand of bow consistanly getting shorter and shorter and still producing amazing bows. guess i was just intersted in the subject and was wondering what the truth was. Note that i dont care about the brand of bow this has nothing to do with it. thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rage2blade,

by no means am I an expert on this but from what I have learned is that most companies are going with short a2a is for weight, and convenience for the hunter. Most bows with a shorter a2a can be harder to tune but the bows now days are very easy compared to bows of the early 90s. The longer a2a's are infact easier to tune are better for longer shoots afield. If you lived and hunted in more open country or hunted speed goats, or mulies that are typical shots a longer a2a comes into play or performs better. Again I'm sure sticknstrings or Dietz will chime in but thats what I have learned and think the reasoning for the differences.

mr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bows have become shorter in the last few years. They are easier to move around in a tree stand for sure. Much of the shorter bows have come with parallel technology bows. It is true that a bow with a longer axel to axel will be more accurate and forgiving. Which is also true of a longer brace height. However for most hunting and shots well inside of 30 yards, the new bows of today that are shorter seem to be plenty accurate. I myself whom is also a big target archer, went with a longer bow, they feel better in my hands and I have more confidence.

Shorter bows usually have a longer power stroke, and hence faster speeds, which has much to do with the companies offering shorter bow.. they are all in the speed race at this point. Which I dont think is always a good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated, bows of today are entirely different animals than just a short 10 years ago. That DXT will shoot smoother & faster than the majority of its predecessors. I'd still shy away from the ultra-short brace heights as they'll typically be less forgiving and warrant wrist slap - say anything under 6 1/2 - unless you're a speed guy(X-Force). I wouldn't focus on the length of the bow so much unless you're a finger shooter (short a2a would cause arrow pinch) or do a lot of hunting out of ground blinds or stalking through brush where maneuverability would be an issue. I'm 6'3" and prefer something in the 32-35" w/ a bh around 7 to 7 1/2".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • At the big M today and tomorrow. $4.99 for 6 pcs. Seems like someone is always looking for it.
    • I get what you are getting at but I couldn't care less about a person's choice of cooking method and whether it has more or less steps. The fact is I do things in cooking quite often that might not be the simplest way to achieve the results but I do it how I like it. As we speak I have a beef roast in one of those over-cooking crock pots that Del hates. It was easy, put roast and a couple other ingredients into the pot and turn it on, simple. But sometimes I like to take a piece of meat and marinade it or brine it then maybe inject it then rub it with a bunch of seasonings I mix together then light some charcoals, then dump lit charcoals on top of unlit charcoals then wait for temperature to be at optimal level then put meat on grill then check temp every half hour, then baste from time to time, then possibly foil, then possibly unfoil, then cook some more, then sauce, then let rest......you get the picture My main problem with souse vide is that I would never be certain I wasn't poisoning myself or my family.
    • Method 1- Take a steak. Put in a bag. Season, marinate etc. Get plastic container and fill with water to recommended level. Vacuum seal the bag Plop said bag in the water Add glorified fish tank heater Set temp and walk away until you hit the desired internal temp. Pull bag. Start grill or frying pan Cut bag,dump steak in the pan or on the grill. Cook steak until done Clean up grill or pan Dump out water Wash water pan Put away vacuum sealer.   Method 2 Start pan or grill Season steak Cook steak Eat steak Wash pan or grill Relax.
    • yup interesting but I too will stay with grills and smokers.......   and frying pans...
    • Well since Del once again can't be bothered to provide supporting evidence to his own arguments I thought I would do it for him, again. If anyone here is really interested in sous vide cooking I would suggest reading this:  http://www.douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html. This is probably about as comprehensive a guide to souse vide as you will find and the first part about food safety is very interesting and explains what Del couldn't. At this point I personally don't think the method is for me but I would keep an open mind and would like to taste some of the food produced by souse vide sometime.(hint) If you like to figure out mathematical equations in order to keep you and your family safe and tenderness is your one and only consideration when cooking a meal then sous vide may be for you. For me I love that smoky grilled flavor I get from cooking over fire or coals. 
    • Who's the one here who argues in favor of the FDA every chance he gets?
    • Good for you! Hard to get them wimmen away from that "put it back on the rack;  it ain't yet black!" mindset....
    • I deep fried a wild turkey yesterday to almost the recommended temp and thought it was way over done and on the verge of being a waste.  My wife thought it was great. I carved the domestic turkey in the roaster before the magic button popped and temp was barely140.  It was fantastic.  My wife was apprehensive but had to agree it was just right. I m slowly getting her off the “It ain’t cooked till it’s brown all the way through”.  
    • Yep, I'll be hunting off an on during the season. Plan on hunting Saturday afternoon.
    • Assuming you are hunting MN, the regs aren't super clear about quartering, but if you read them it sounds like quartering is fine as long as the deer is registered first.  If you don't have cell service to accomplish that before you quarter you need to keep the head attached to one of the quarters.  You could still get it done it might just make for an awkward load on your back.  I would also recommend a good pack for doing this, or your going to kill your back and shoulders.  I run a Mystery Ranch and have had about 90-100lbs in it many times while training and hunting.  That should mean even a big deer would be manageable in two trips for one person.   I hunt some pretty nasty country, so my pack and a couple game bags ride in my truck all season so I'm prepared for anything.  If you go that route consider getting yourself a pair of trekking poles as well.  They don't break the bank and they make a huge difference when you have a heavy load on your back.  As a bonus my MR Cabinet also holds my stand, and climbing sticks really nice when packing that in a long ways.
  • Our Sponsors