Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
micpic

Need Photo Help

5 posts in this topic

I'm a novice for photography, and have recently been practicing shooting RAW. Things are looking better but my images seem real soft, not blurry but not as sharp as I would expect.

This image of a Rose-breasted Grosbeak was shot this morning in a mix of shade and sun. The focus point was on the chest, and the settings were as follows.

TV 1/640 AV 7.1 ISO 400 WB Shade

I'm using a Canon 20D with a 100-400L lens and it was set @400mm.

I'm wondering if this is the best I could get or are there some suggestions as what I could have done better. I can take criticism well, that's how a person learns. Just take in fact that I'm a novice and need terms I can understand.

Mic 2890190773_773fa3e649_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mic, I shot that body/lens combo hard for several years, so am really familiar with how images should look. While your image looked a little soft on my screen, it did not look like a lens or a technique issue. Thanks for posting the exif. That makes things easier.

I just think this is an issue of not enough sharpening in post processing. There are quite a few good regimens for sharpening digital images for web display. All digital images need some level of sharpening to look their best, and shooting RAW guarantees you'll need to sharpen, since cameras can do some in-camera sharpening on jpegs if you set it that way but not with RAW images. If you've been shooting jpeg and your parameters (you can set them in the menu) indicate some in-camera sharpening, your RAW images will definitely look softer out of the camera than your jpeg images.

Mic, in the repost of your photo below, I didn't get fancy at all, I just used unsharp mask in Photoshop CS2 with the radius set at .7 and sharpened it in a single pass with the whole image at 200 percent. That alone helped the image. Take a look.

2890275709_48a40e4b0a_o.jpg

Often, especially if the background is very buttery and clean and I don't want to make it look more grainy, I will carefully lasso the bird in PS and sharpen it individually. When I do that, I take pains to make sure I'm actually lassoing the bird just inside the bird's edge, so that any sharpening I do avoids a telltale "sharpening halo," which can form along edges between subject and background if the edge is included within the lasso.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve, that's what I'm looking for. Your repost is much better. I'm pretty weak a editing and with winter coming on I'm hoping I'll have time to work on all this.

Mic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mic, what post processing program do you use? It's all a learning process, and a fun one at that. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, I'm just using Digital Pro that came with the camera. I do have Photoshop Elements 2.0 but have not used it yet.

Mic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • He was talking about updating and upgrading our nuclear weapons,  which aren't related to the middle east.    Getting the 53 brigade combat teams up to readiness standards also will cost money.  
    • How much of that $6 trillion do you suppose is military spending?  I’d venture to guess a large amount of it.  Now while he talks about spending so much in the middle east and ignoring issues at home he apparently wants to add an additional $54 billion to the defense budget which will more than likely be funneled back into the middle eat one bomb at a time.   He might make sense in what he says from time to time but then his actions seem immediately contradict his words. Should we believe the words or the actions more?
    •  Decriminalization only makes small possession and usage kinda illegal.    Laws still have to be upheld.   Mexican cartels still would not be allowed to ship tons of cocaine over the boarder. Doctor still can't write false scripts.  Gangs still cannot run drug dens Staus quo     Just push for complete legalization. Regulate through the government. Lower the cost of product.     Cross your fingers you don't get a Russian heroine epidemic.    Freedom restored.      
    • "We spend $6 trillion in the Middle East, and we have potholes all over our highways and our roads"

      Every now and then it is hard to argue with Trump, the positives aren't many but he is not wrong about everything.
    •     Also, how do you explain the growth rate of U.S. incarcerations since Nixon began the War on Drugs in 1971?   You don't think there is big money involved in prisons?       http://fox6now.com/2017/02/25/private-prison-stocks-up-100-since-president-trumps-win/          
    • DALLAS TRADES BENN to Montreal !!!!!!   Jordie   for a 4th round pick and some no-name....Jordie was bad and playing worse lately
    •   He won't ask anyone's advice - that's a big part of the problem.  But judging by his actions and words, he fully intends to return to the criminalization/prison approach.  You know, the method that was a complete failure in the past.   Why wouldn't pharma be worried about heroin and meth?  They make versions of both, so it is direct competition.  There is also real life evidence to suggest that marijuana can be used as a replacement for opioids for pain, so that is a reason for them to be opposed to the legalization of weed, also.  Do you have a better explanation as to why Trump wants to step up enforcement of federal laws against legal purveyors of marijuana according to their state law, rather than simply changing the FDA/DEA classification?                   They would be comparable, except they have spent close to a trillion dollars on the War on Drugs since Nixon signed it into law,      
    •   Is this speculation or do you have a source for this information?    
    • Without media, you will only get what news from the party in control that they wish to give you. With no freedom of the press, no matter what they say, you will eventually lose more than the 1rst. amendment.  Let's see what happens when the President addresses Congress and if it's a rally speech or a substance speech with policy? If it's just rah-rah??, with the corrupt  media,----make up your own mind.  
    • If you ever want to feel like a puny human, go mess with those big boys. Nice pics!
  • Our Sponsors