Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Dbl

Attn: Canon 40D users

10 posts in this topic

I would love to get some feedback from those of you using the 40D, specifically when using the camera in AI Servo focus mode. Your impressions on how well it tracks and how fast it moves if it moves off track. Shooting horizontal or vertical, what lens, how many focus points selected? What type of subject were you shooting and conditions.

Rob Galbraith has commented on the occasional erratic AI Servo performance on this camera. I'm interested in hearing from real-world users and their experiences. Thanks so much for any feedback in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, Rob Galbraith, who I just quoted in the 5D Mk2 thread, mentions the same thing in that quote. I wonder if Ken has used his 40D Al servo much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used my 40D for almost a year now, and must say I've been very happy with it. I have two 1D II bodies, and Al Servo is a tad slower than those, to be expected. Can't say that I've missed many shots because of camera problem - plenty because of operator error! grin Most of my shooting has been with either the 100-400L or the 17-40L. Actually, I haven't had any of my 2.8 glass on it because they're usually sitting on the 1D bodies. Might have to try them out.

Sorry, I usually use center focus only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shot a fair amount of BIF this spring, mostly ducks. Took me awhile to get the swing down, but got a lot of good shots once I got into the rhythm.

Haven't used it for sports. Should really do that and give some rest to my 1D's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ken and Steve you are correct, it is Rob Galbraith who mentions that, not Canon. I've heard the comments from some sports shooters as well about this issue, taking it all with a grain of salt. I've also heard it is very good in AI Servo! crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan,

In my experience it has depended highly on the background. I've done a lot of waterfowl shooting in AI servo. I used to shoot with the Rebel XT then I upgraded to the 40D. In shooting against a blue sky background the 40 locks much more quickly and quite accurately. My "keeper" rate, so to speak, increased dramatically with the 40D. I have made it a habit of shooting waterfowl with the center autofocus point selected. Lately, I've been attempting a lot more habitat shots of waterfowl in flight. I've noticed the autofocus has a difficult time distinguishing between the bird and the background. This may be true for almost any body, but I can't really speak to it as I've never used a 1 series body. I should also qualify that the habitat shots I've been attempting have been with the birds at distance which really minimizes their contrast/separation in regards to the background. For the few shots where I have had birds in a little tighter, the AI servo did a better job of locking on target. All of my shooting has been with the 100-400, so I can't speak to the difference with an f/2.8 lens. I would love to get a 400 f/2.8 on the body to see what it can do, but alas I'm a little short on the six to seven thousand dollars one of those fetches. Hope this helps, I wish had a wider array of shooting situations and lens combos to comment on - but this is the best I can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dbl,

I have only had the 40d for about 6 months,also have the 20d.

It seems faster than the 20d by quite a bit.

I have it on AI Servo most of the time and for BIF shots with 100-400L I have had it go out of focus sometimes and I have to focus on some trees or something to get it back good enough to follow the bird again,this is usually against a blue sky and I think it may be me loosing tracking of the bird, more than the camera.

Like mcary says if the bird is out a ways and crosses in font of trees, I have had it seeem to jump to the trees.

For the times it goes way out of focus, there is a setting (function III-1 I think)that will stop it before it goes too far, but I have not tried it yet.

Thanks

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike and Dan thanks for you experiences. Sounds to me like you guys are experiencing typical operation. The circumstances you both mention are difficult for any camera and tough on the operator to keep on target, especially if a bird is at even a slight distance.

I'm used to my Mark IIN but have at least 75,000 sports images through a 20D and a 30D so I've got a wide range of experience on both good and and not quite as good. I'm just looking at a 40D as a third backup camera at this time next to a 50D and the Mark II. I'm just curious what other 40D users have found using AI Servo and tracking.

I am only shooting 2.8 lenses so the performance of the focus system should be a bit better than say the 100-400. Anyone notice any difference in tracking when shooting vertical or horizontal?

Again thanks to all for their experiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan, I can't speak for the 40D, but a significant amount of my 30D shooting this last two years (and the 20D before that) has been with f2.8 lenses. I can say that in Al servo with the center focus point selected the camera/lens is noticeably faster and more accurate with focusing. I've used the 70-200 f2.8 and 400 f2.8 on this body. While my 400 f5.6L acquires focus a bit faster than my 100-400 did (just enough difference to be noticeable), there's a very clear difference with the f2.8 glass. I have to assume you'd find the 40D/50D comparably faster/more accurate with f2.8 or faster glass than the slower glass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I had the 100-400 for a summer on the 20D and switched to the 70-200/2.8 it did make a difference. I am guessing not much different than the 40D will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • From your link-     I thought I would highlight a few tidbits for the Benghazi impaired . 
    •   NSA To Provide "Smoking Gun" Proof Obama Spied On Trump Mar 24, 2017 5:43 AM   Yesterday, Republican Devin Nunez Nunes held an explosive press conference outside the White House in which he told reporters that communications from the Trump team were picked up and disseminated within the government during the 2016 campaign.  Not surprisingly, the comments ruffled some liberal feathers and the mainstream media launched an immediate smear campaign calling for Nunes to resign his post immediately.  Now, according to Fox News sources, congressional investigators expect that a potential “smoking gun” from the NSA establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee as early as tomorrow.   The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.   The FBI hasn’t been responsive to the House Intelligence Committee’s request for documents, but the National Security Agency is expected to produce documents to the committee by Friday. The NSA document production is expected to produce more intelligence than Nunes has so far seen or described – including what one source described as a potential “smoking gun” establishing the spying.   Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretappedhim in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.   The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.   Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing. If true, of course, this could put a 'slight' taint Obama's claim of a "scandal free" eight years in the White House.   **snip**   .........If Nunes is correct, and Trump was being wiretapped for reasons having nothing to do with Russia, that entire narrative falls apart, and the press will now have to spend the next few weeks building up an entirely new narrative to "justify" why Trump was being wiretapped on Obama's watch.   Link     Delicious...  
    • My wife and I like to float down the Crow from Rockford to the Mississippi. Hardly anyone on the river except Bald Eagles. Found some nice chicken of the woods mushrooms last summer.
    • Trump got the information from Nunes. Nunes heads the House intel committee, but Nunes also was a member of Trump's transition team. Nunes then fed information to Trump (information that apparently nobody else on the intelligence committee has) about incidental observation of Trump and his transition team (a team that includes Nunes himself). 
    • A better question would be are you right?  Even the articles you link to don't really support your "most likely" assertions so you have to resort to everything is a lie as evidence, like Donald's twitter, and anyone that doesn't believe your alternative facts is an Obama luvin' librul. 
    • What projects have you worked on? Big or small lets see um. Anything, guns, boats, cars, Decoys.    I had fun reworking a few old Harley Golf carts. Didn't have any digital before shots to post. The carts I got were in very bad shape. Had to do a lot of fiberglass body work on them and some mechanical work to get them running. Just used boat seats as I didn't want to throw a bunch of cash at reworking the old seats and one cart had no seats at all when I got it. I took all the big chrome front bumper and bag bars off and glassed over the holes. Everyone had cracks in the front nose cones and rear ends. Not perfect but fun. Top picture is one of the nicer ones I started reworking.
    • Do you have any thoughts about what state you're heading to for this?  CO is draw only but there are lots of decent options available with 0 points. MT had leftover tags which is good because you missed the deadline already. WY has options you could draw. ND has passed. NM passed. UT not a good option with no points I think. ID may have some options but not certain. SD and NE may have some good options but I've never hunted either.   That's some basic info on states. Once you pick a state and get a tag it's really not complicated for the most part. Get elevated, glass up a muley, bed him, sneak in him without being smelled it seen, shoot him!   My son and I just found out we drew ND muley tags this year so we're pumped about that!
    • Just random ones I like. 1) Grand Marais fall. 2) HSO member Laker fishing. 3) Door County Wis.
    •   Yep and the Hawks won again!
  • Our Sponsors