Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tonkapat

how much can these lakes take

84 posts in this topic

I have never seen so many musky fisherman consistantly pounding away as this year. Vermillion in july was a zoo. Metro has been rediculous for a while. how long will it take to turn it into junk. look at what bass tournaments have done to tonka. from setting b.a.s.s. records to whats left now. Is that where we are headed? how many released fish are dying? I don't think u can count on fishing getting any better soon. maybe time to start bass fishing again, there are less guys fishing for them on tonka then musky guys. good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

these are some very valid and important questions, tonkapat.

fortunatly the metro solution is very easy.... we as muskie fisher's can't make our purchase of a fishing license the only ''donation'' we make to our sport to keep it sustained. by donating to the likes of M.I., and/for the DNR we can help ensure we can enjoy our sport forever without interuption. donations help stock lakes with adult fish as well as juviniles. it takes alot of money to feed and house a bunch of hungry muskie for a year or more. i'm just glad it's an easy fix. it's just money.

on a side note. i'm also happy the croix is so daunting for most. not only is it huge and unforgiving, but around here not too many places have houses cruising by continuously kicking up waves from H E doubletoothpicks, with only a few places to hide. pretty discourageing. ahhh bliss. cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll continue to say that not many properly handled fish die. I can site some numbers from Wisconsin that state the number of fish is more closely related to the number stocked than angling pressure, and that's from a state where harvest is a little higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, this is what i've been preaching all year. I cannot believe how many boats I've seen at the same time pitching the big stuff. On WBL, on 1 side of the lake, i've counted more than 20 boats and on more than 10 occasions. The pressure is unreal, I almost feel bad fishing for these fish. Every one i've caught this year has had hook marks or lots of flesh damage from being caught previously.

It's not even really just muskies either. Fishing pressure around the metro in general is WAY up, I think thanks to gas prices. We will run this earth and it's resources into oblivion, it's only a matter of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We definitely need more lakes and more info on fish handling, especially the need for water release in the summer and in poor conditions, I really don't think we'll see the crowding go way any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess those people werent at the Muskie Expo listening to RK's seminar about the secondary spots... oh well.. times like this would be good to hit the secondary spots...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess those people werent at the Muskie Expo listening to RK's seminar about the secondary spots... oh well.. times like this would be good to hit the secondary spots...

I think you're missing the bigger picture here reb....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant agree more w/ JRedig. I often wonder how much can these lakes take. How much longer? I do often feel bad for the fish and dont mind if they get off before they make the net or boat, many are really beat up and dont look good. Heres my opinion why i dont think it will be long until we are all really struggling to get fish, escpecially big fish. 1. Its not just Minnesotans fishing MN, its the whole upper Midwest now 2. Cowgirl, doesnt take much skill and kills alot of fish (back hook down the throat) 3. Too many fishing guides pounding these lake to a pulp every day (makes it tought for others) and giving up so much info on those trips (the client can really take that info and are already up to speed on location and lures).

I dont see many bass or walleye guys like i used too and often wonder how good bass and walleye fishing may become soon. W/o more lakes in my opionon, it wont be long till these lakes are toast. Lakes cant handle all the pressure, you have guys from all over the midwest, poor releases, awesome fish producing lures that dont take much skill, is my opionon why it wont be long till fishing muskie fishing really take a dive. I live in the metro, i do wish NE WI was a little closer and that may be the area w/ alot less pressure and good lakes to pick from????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be intersting to see if the changes we've seen on some of these lakes this year is biological or a result of pressure. I would think that any detrimental effects of pressure would be gradual, as some of the differences we're seeing are pretty stark compared to last year. We may never know for sure. I'm sure there are a few guides and other businesses that are pretty worried right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be the first one to step up to the plate and stop fihsing these lakes. It is kind of like complaining about people speeding when you are doing 70 mph in a 55 mph zone. It seems if you are out on these lakes and pitching for the same fish then you are part of the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think of it as so much of complaining, but being concerned and aware as a sport that one enjoys. Being aware and informed may be some how (i dont know how) could reduce the risk or be beneficial somehow???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it gets kicked around some and the logistics would be tough from and enforcement standpoint but wouldn't a muskie stamp help a bit with regards to this. It may not reduce the numbers of anglers a great deal but the extra $$ could be used to go back into the resource. I'd like to think that pheasant stamp $$ has helped with habitat etc. I buy a stamp every year even though my fat arse likes sitting in a duck blind more than stomping through fields.

There are a lot of guys and gals who like to fish - period. We live where you gotta shovel snow for 6 months so we all take advantage of the summer so it doesn't shock me that there's so much pressure. I guess I'm a big part of the problem - I have two little kids so heading out of town most weekends doesn't work for me right now. That said, when the water temps get close to the 80 mark and higher maybe its time to back off and give them a rest. I'm rambling a bit too much but until they put a ticket taker at each landing to limit access, fishing pressure is a fact of life so I think edcucating folks on the ethics of the sport, whether you're chasing muskies or bass is important.

Lastly I find it odd that I've only been checked once by a C.O. in the metro in the past 15 years and that was on the walleye opener. I fish less now than before I had kids, but I still get out 40-50 times per year mostly in the metro. I know most people are irritated when they are checked but I don't mind it a bit. With this much pressure on the lakes couldn't they help educate a lot more people and maybe even nail a bad guy or two?

-erik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will come down to how much people are willing to spend in stocking operations to help maintain musky populations. However, we often wait untill there is a major problem instead of being proactive. If the populations are really affected it would take a few years for the fisheries to come around. From what I have heard it takes about 5 yrs for a musky to reach 32-34 inches.

With this much pressure on the lakes couldn't they help educate a lot more people and maybe even nail a bad guy or two?

With you all the way, I have never been checked. I have fished all over the place, rainy river, st croix, St Louis, WB, Bald Eagle, LOTW, V, Madison (WI), and alot of places in between. Probably 70-80 different bodies of water and never have been checked.(Most of the trips were for species other then musky. Musky fishing has only been an interest the last 3 summer/fall). Most of this musky stuff is new to me, still trying to get the hang of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping the twin cities and all of mn are proactive on this issue(I know some areas of MN are very good about being proactive on stocking operations). However, we often wait untill there is a major problem instead of being proactive.

The Twin Cities Chapter of MI (Shawn Kellett, et al) is the most proactive chapter in the state, if not the country when it comes to stocking.

They not only stock a lot of fish in the metro, but they were key in spearheading the approval of the long range esox plan that was approved and will add more muskie lakes to the mix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the twin cities chapter is proactive, I have been to some of their events, they do great things for the sport of musky fishing. I was more saying as a state and a fishing community as a whole(everywhere there is musky fishing).

By no means was I bashing the twin cities chapter, just to make that clear...I have donated some of my own $$$ for the madison and twin cites chapters and plan do so in the future depite being a broke college student. We are all in this together...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

browndog, your comment is almost too stupid to dignify a response, but a relatively small group of people are all working to make sure the larger group, everyone, has ample places to fish.

it's not selfishness on our part, quite the opposite.

thanks for your thoughtful comments though. this would have been a great thread about 8 months ago before the gull lake meeting and approval of the long range plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are kinda of like the guy that catches and releases 100 walleye with a mortality rate of 10%(I am guessing the mortality rate is actually higher) and complaining about the fact that someone catches and keeps a limit of 6 once a year to eat. In the end you have killed 4 more fish but you feel more noble about yourself because you threw them all back.

I didn't realize that this thread was about muskie fishing. So now I really don't care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't have it both ways.

With a great fishery comes great exposure, with great exposure comes pressure.

Remember everyone starts somewhere. Whether it is with gramps who fills the fish basket or alone learning the ropes.

All fisherman have the same rights to the same water. We are all equals.

Being proactive and educational towards the protection and future of any kind of fish is the biggest difference people can make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how many of you plan to vote "Yes" to the amendment this fall. So that more resources can be directed towards not only the health of the fish but the lakes also. I dont do alot of fishing but you can bet I will vote yes. If not....you reap what you sow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the verdict on Gull Lake? Did the stocking get shot down?

I'm not being sarcastic either. I guess my father in-law is looking for a shack up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the laugh at work today Brown, if bad logic and random numbers made kings I'd be bowing down right now.

I'm going to grab the concubines, jump in my royal carriage, and meet the rest of the noblemen at the lake. I've also found musky fishing is much easier when the peasants run the boat for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RMAC... from what I know... Gull Lake wont be stocked... it'll be Pokegama instead... theres a posting somewhere on FM.com that covered that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't have it both ways.

With a great fishery comes great exposure, with great exposure comes pressure.

Remember everyone starts somewhere. Whether it is with gramps who fills the fish basket or alone learning the ropes.

All fisherman have the same rights to the same water. We are all equals.

Being proactive and educational towards the protection and future of any kind of fish is the biggest difference people can make.

DTRO -

You're right on. I love fishing in general and recently have become pretty wound up about muskies (looks like your kitties are pretty fun though smile ) - the one thing that bugs me though is that some folks actually think they deserve the fish they catch more than the next guy... Its actually okay AND legal for someone who doesn't fish 100 days a year to go out and occasionally keep a few for a meal (I'm not talking about trophy muskies). Its also a good idea for his kids to see their dad put a few back in the water - they WILL do as they are taught.

Its no secret that we have some lakes with pretty good fishing so we need to think a bit of the bigger picture , just ask anyone who use to shoot ducks in the little potholes that have disappeared.

-erik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this has spread to more than just the metro. Take a look at mille lacs and how much pressure it recieved. Somehow it kept producing, but not now. You drive across the north end now and see 5 boats. Last year it would have been over 100. I think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel, What are the closest options if you were at Gull. Alexander? or Mille Lacs and Cedar? I'm not real familiar with that area, I might be soon though.

I think everybody can thank the internet for anglers grouping up on certain lakes. There is plenty of water out there but when people are constantly hearing the same names pop-up they tend to flock there. I am all for more stocking and promoting catch and release. However, there is a lot of water out there and if everyone spread out it might be a more relaxing experience to fish around here.

By the way, anybody ever talk about stocking Big Marine?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors