Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
gopher_nation

Your new starting QB: Gus Frerotte

Recommended Posts

Just announced on KFAN, PA and Dubay!! Usually a secret move, but the announcement on a Wednesday is probably to spark some fan interest into buying the 3,700 unsold tickets. The actual switch at QB is to obviously give us a chance to win.

Well it has me excited now!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mixed feelings on this. TJack was less than impressive, but I think Bevell is the real problem. We will see though. I want some wins no matter who is handing the ball off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I think Gus will give us a little better chance at winning than TJack, I still don't think he's the answer. If anything, I think with Gus' increased down-field accuracy as compared to TJack's, maybe the offense can stretch the opposing D a little so that AP can be more effective than he already is. The opposing defenses need to be put back on their heals a little bit and right now, they've got their ears pinned back ready to attack the line and AP. Of course, stretching the D also depends on the play calling as well.

Surprised at Chilli's move, but the Vikes need to start all over at the qb and head coach positions and hopefully they (they being Ziggy) will after the season's over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isnt if amazing eyepatrol? 31 coaches in the NFL would be stretching the field with the way defenses have to approach the vikings running game. We'll see if it was really lack of confidence in Jackson or if Childress really doesnt get it......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gus is not the answer, but is better than T-Jack for now.

This will not open up the playbook for Chilly though.

I wish all the sofa-coaches would actually get a coaching job once and see what it is like.

How many teams nearly made the playoffs (last year) with a terrible QB?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling ol' ziggy got into his ear about it. Play calling is a big part of it, but maybe when they do use a pass play it won't hit the receiver in the ankles now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gus is not the answer, but is better than T-Jack for now.

This will not open up the playbook for Chilly though.

I wish all the sofa-coaches would actually get a coaching job once and see what it is like.

How do you know he'll be better than TJack? He's 37 years old, thrown 102td's and 91 int's in his career. At least TJack was a mobile QB, Gus doesn't move that well and probably will be sacked more often. There will be some 2nd guessing if Gus doesn't do well....."Why didn't they give TJack at least 6 starts?"

There are a lot of people that have coached at all levels...high school, college, pro's etc.. that have failed miserably, so take it easy on your fellow Vikings posters. They have a right to their opinions as well. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with everyone that says the plays need to be changed up a bit.

Here’s is why I think Gus will give them better chance. I think he will be a bit more composed and confident in the pocket, find the open receiver, and then give the receiver a chance to catch the ball.

TJ did this as well, but I think Gus will be more consistent.

Also Gus knows he can’t just take off scrambling if things break down, so he has to be more patient and let things develop.

It will be interesting and at the very least sparked my interest to check out the game on Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You better hope you can watch it, or you will have to go to it. At last report not sold out, therefore, can you say BLACKOUT.

There are opinions back and forth on this. Time will tell. I like it as T-Jack would be better suited for the indoor league, IMO. I also think Gus can read defenses better than T Jack.

G.C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but I have been to games and saw people open down field...waving their arms...and T-Jack not seeing them. Only seeing the short pass. And, he completion % is not even that high on the short pass. Also, you can't pass the bomb without pass protection. T-Jack needs to much time for it appears he can't see the whole field.

And, he has a year to develop as a starter. No improvements that I see (or slight). If Gus is bad (and could be), he may be back. The Vikes have to give it a try though.

Every thinks they can do better than the coach. Maybe because they know they can't do better than a pro player. Many times, a coach is only as good as their team. And, I thought T-Jack was our answer...even before this season started. But after games 1 and 2 and all of last year...I have changed my mind. I think Chilly is in the same boat.

If Gus does bad, people will scream "See, it is the coach". Well, Gus is not the answer either...but they have to try something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it your an NFL QB? since your making judgements on NFL QB's on here?

Not sure who that was directed at, but if it was me, that was funny.

I really don't need to judge T-Jack, I leave that to the hundreds of Division 1 programs that wouldn't let him play for them grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is Gus isn't going to go out and throw for 300 yards. He's not going to be an amazing QB. AP and our defense are going to win the games for us, but most importantly Gus wont go out and lose the game for us.

He's a veteran that will bring some change to the locker room. I'm sure there is some tension between the offense and defense and hopefully the veteran can help ease it.

I'm sure Zygi had quite a bit to do with the announcement. He went out and got the players that Chilly needed in order to win games. He spent a lot of money and so far there is nothing to show for it. Probably something like, "Your guy TJack isn't getting it done. Fix it or you're done!!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gus is going to get smeared all over the field. I am not so sure he will be able to find the open receiver from the hospital bed with the way our o-lines protects against the pass rush and him having no mobility whatsoever. Childress is another Les Steckel put him out of his misery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you are missing part of my point. Childress is the one who has been saying all along how well jackson is coming along. if hes coming along than let go of the reigns and let him chuck the ball. if he isnt coming along, then why did we bring Gus in and not someone else? either way you look at it, whether its play calling, false confidence in Jackson leading the team to not bring someone else in, poor judgement on talent evaluation, it all comes full circle and points and Childress. no QB in the league succeeds when 2 plays are called 90% of the time in a 2nd half. you don't win by just calling dive up the middle or rollout right. you couldnt make things easier on a defense. when myself and the people around me are sitting in the dome watching the colts game and guessing what the vikings plays are going to be based on formation at about a 90% clip, what do you think defensive coordinators calling out defensive plays are thinking? Point in case, a sequence in the 2nd half of that game. 1st down run, 2nd down run, 3rd down and 5 line up with 2 TE's and Wade the single reciever. The play call is a naked bootleg to the right which goes for 1 yard. Who is this fooling??!! The defense is not playing run at this point, the fake isnt doing any good!! This is a play you run on 1st or 2nd down when the defense is dialing up on AP. This is not rocket science and its not something you need to be a head coach to figure out. Its just plain horrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Take it to that pawn shop in Las Vegas. They will bring in an expert to tell you it's history,give you a low ball offer once they find out and then you can just walk. 
    • I've always been partial to the fold down couch in the back but I'd want to have storage under it and a fold down bunk above it. One thing to keep in mind is the heater.  I know you said the current heater stays for this season and maybe next but if you're doing work on the layout now you should probably plan for the new heater now even if its not going in for a year or two.  You'd hate to do all this work adjusting the layout only to find out you should have done something differently to accommodate the new heater. 
    • If mine,  I would add those drop down bunks and some pedestal boat seats.  With a smaller house like that I would want as much open area as possible.  I think those big couch/sofas take too much room.  You can always drop the bunk and take a snooze without taking up floor fishing space.  Just some thoughts.......
    • I tried a glass of a buddy's Templeton Rye last night and was impressed. I'm not big of Rye's but this one was very smooth. I can't say I'd ever buy a bottle but someone else's booze is always up near the top of the list of my favorites. I still prefer the $15 Trader Joe's bourbon though. 
    • I didn't figure anyone at cabelas would be any help. I have scoured the gun and haven't ever been able to find any markings of any kind. I forgot to mention in the previous post that it's a 16 gauge.  If nothing else, it'll look cool hanging over my basement bar. 
    • Ha I remember showing ya a thing or 2!!! Not sure where your son got his fishin prowess from though! Yea well!! oh I changed my poopy pants!
    • I can't see the pics?
    • You might be better off trying to do some research on your own on the old shotgun. I think it would be a waste of time taking it to Cabela's since most of the folks  who work there now think  any gun made before 1970 is an antique. The gun surely is made in Europe and might have originated in one of the English or Belgian or even German "guild" shops, little outfits that cranked out inexpensive guns that did not even bear maker's names since they were made by a "bunch" of guys. Your best bet would be to trace or photograph the proof marks and go from there.  That is,  I'm assuming it has proof marks :).
    • For an exciting adventure in shooting grab an old "trapdoor" Springfield and rattle off a few rounds of 45-70 or 45-90.  If you're of skinny build and little weight it'll give you a THUMP you'll remember!   Perfect deer cartridge for MN though since that big ol' bullet will go churning through the brush like a D-8 Cat until it hit's it's target. Have been around the old '94 30-30 since way back when and while it is handy it is not that accurate and lacks the knock-down power of many, many of today's rounds. But if you just have to have one as I always say, it''s your money. Keep in mind you can buy the .35 Remington in a pump action,   which a lot of MN duck hunters find easy to use come deer season.
    • I have an old Damascus barreled shotgun that was passed on to me by my grandpa. The story I have always heard and been told is that it was brought over from Denmark by my great grandfather in 1915. It has no markings indicating where it was made or anything else that I could use to figure out some history on the gun. It is a pin fire and has a stag carved into the underside of the stock. Anyone have any ideas on where I could find any info on this? I had thought about bringing it to Cabelas and see if they knew anything about it. I'm not concerned about the value. I'd just like to know a little more about it or even get pointed in the right direction. 
  • Our Sponsors