Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
deerminator

North Dakota Ranchers Support Ban on Sale of Hunting Rights

Recommended Posts

I guess I had never considered this, the legal possibility of selling off your hunting property to a farmer or rancher but retaining the permanent right to hunt the property. I can actually really side with the ranchers on this. Most hunters are ethical and responsible, but why would you want to chance some yahoo tearing up your land. Sure, you can say, then don't buy it if there's that stipulation, but what if everyone decided to do this, then all of the land would have this stipulation attached. You can also see how they would lose revenue from outfitters or how guys could take advantage on the land they have rights on and set up their own outfitting business with the rancher getting nothing.

Plus, as a hunter, I'm not so sure I'd like this arrangement, what if the rancher was a yahoo and you were always walking on egg shells with him. Seems like the legal agreement would have to be VERY defined to keep one side or the other from taking advantage. I'm kind of partial to the old system, buy your own land, or if you don't have the money, help a farmer or rancher out, gain their trust and be able to hunt the land for free or a nominal fee.

http://www.twincities.com/allheadlines/ci_10485887

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see a problem with retaining rights to hunt on property. If someone wants the land bad enough they will agree; if you do not agree do not buy the land.

I see no difference in this compared to retaining rights for minerals on a property. What if you bought some wooded land and the paper company wanted to retain the right to log out the property and you only wanted it for hunting. Price comes down and you have some land to call your own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy, unless the rancher had land that was just sitting there, never being used, I don't think that I would do it. It could be a very sticky situation. The contract would have to be very tight.

That said, I know some areas around here that would be cool to buy the hunting rights on. It would be much cheaper than buying and maybe more concrete than a lease.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Sure, you can say, then don't buy it if there's that stipulation, but what if everyone decided to do this,

If everyone rejected the idea, nobody would be able to sell their land.

Personally, I'd really have a hard time buying a chunk of land while still giving the seller some legal access or rights to the property. Do those sellers also then pay for a portion of the taxes or are they legal bound to pay an annual user fee? If I was buying and they wanted to sell to me, they have to agree to those stipulations as well otherwise, they could find another sucker.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This type of "use and enjoyment" easement is very common. I have never heard of one specifically for hunting. However, I really don't see it as any different from a hunting guy buying a plot then leasing it to a farmer or a farmer purchasing a lot then leasing it in the fall to a hunter. Just a more permanent arrangement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless, whether you agree with whoever, it just seems like it could become a big mess no matter how many rules and stipulations came into play. I'd rather own property free and clear or find a rancher or landowner who I could have a good relationship with and if things turn sour for whatever reason, move onto a new piece instead of battling it out with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, this might seem like a good idea at first but could be a big mess in the future. Especially when you are talking about multiple hunters owning hunting rights to a peice of land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • The building codes are really very important in order to keep the property safe. We need to upgrade the house acoording to these building codes.
    • And Del says ya can eat as many as ya want now!!!     
    • great cheap treat those smoked eggs.  
    • I actually prefer Honeycrisp, because of the sweet/tart flavor. Sweet tango ain't bad either. The others get TOO mushy and seem to lose flavor. But, it's a personal preference. Someone'll whine about there are better baking apples.  Made my apple roast the other day with the Honeycrisp, but put it in the crockpot instead of the oven. Came up with this 6-7 yrs ago.  And there's even a picture of it, since words give you so much difficulty, leech.            Reb's  Apple- pork roast


        One boneless 2-3 lb Pork Butt Roast Two cups  Fresh Apple Cider Rosemary Seasoned salt Black pepper to taste 4 oz Cinnamon Apple Sauce (These are the “Snak Pak” size cups) One  large Yellow Onion, sliced thin              Marinate the roast in the cider in a Zip-Loc bag, in the fridge, for 6-8 hours, turning frequently. Place roast in a greased baking dish, with some of the marinade. Sprinkle liberally with seasonings and lightly with the Rosemary.  Place thin layer of onions on top. Pour apple sauce over top. Put in a 300* oven for 45 mns to one hour, uncovered.  Cover and cook  for30- 45 mns- longer or until meat thermometer registers 155-160*. Do not overcook. Let sit covered for 15 minutes before slicing. Enjoy!  
    • @RebelSS, do you recommend any specific type of apples?
    • I forgot to put in the segment winners Spring        Juneau4 Summer     Henry's Heroes Playoff        BlackLundProV
    • Well quit hijacking the thread!!! we'll find someone serious sooner or later!
    • They can explain that over and over and I’m not buying it. I changed my ducer to the 12 like my 18. 
    • So your trying to work out the picture problem-right?
  • Our Sponsors