Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
DT08

Sharing the Road

Recommended Posts

I just found this forum and was reading some old posts. I usually just visit the MN fishing reports forums. Cool to see all the other topics. I think one item that bears bringing up again is sharing the roadways. After reading some of the posts from this spring and then hearing recent news about bike-car incidents and Critical Mass, I think continuing to keep this topic alive is important. Especially on a non-biking HSOforum, where there are many diverse points of view.

I am a bicyclist, but I also put about 50,000 miles a year on my truck and 3-4000 on my motorcycle. So I have some perspective from both sides.

I used to be the cyclist who probably angered motorists. I almost felt like I had greater right-of-way than cars -- almost like a pedestrian. I rarely stopped for a stop sign and always rode up along cars if they were parked at a light.

I don't know if being an avid cyclist starts to give you a holier-than-thou attitude towards motorists because of the health benefits (until you take on a truck!), no emissions and cheaper transport, but it seems like I had that attitude and many cyclist I know did. It wasn't talked about, just seemed to be present.

But as I listen to podcasts and watch the news I see more and more cases where road rage is spilling over to action against bicyclists. It used to be a cyclist may be yelled at, even had some trash thrown at them or got the bird, but now some people have gotten so angry they are using there cars as weapons. One case that stuck out was a physician in CA who pulled ahead of a group of cyclists and braked hard, causing several to crash into the rear of his car. There are many similar stories this year.

I don't know what the answer is other than to encourage cyclists like myself to change our ways and to hope motorists realize most of us our willing to share the road and ride with a respectful attitude towards motorists. I think trying to ride like you are a slow-moving car is best. Move over as best you can and pull over if you are holding up too much traffic. Ride single file when traffic is present. Stay away from busy roadways if possible. Obey traffic laws -- especially when other travellers are around. Acknowledge motorists when they let you cross or give you space when they pass.

I think more and more people are going to be biking in the next years for many reasons. And if we as cyclists don't try to generate goodwill, I think it is only going to get worse. And shoving it in motorists faces like Critical Mass sometimes does is not the way, IMO. To any who read this, thanks for looking at it. Hopefully this topic will keep showing up now and then to keep people aware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dont get me wrong getting out and riding the bike is GREAT!!! but what i dont understand is why cant they ride the sidewalk or the side of the road not the middleof it and they dont stop for stop signs and what not i have almost hit numerous of bikers becasue they didnt stop and they yell at me. Dont get me wrong bike riding is awsome but i mean come on they dont own the road.

Thats just my 2 cents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok rant time. The very day I picked up my new truck from the dealership we had an issue with this topic. My very beautiful 150.

It was West River Parkway in Minneapolis at 5pm on a Wednesday. Hardcore traffic on this busy street during rush hour. Yes, I understand that there was a Triathlon in town that weekend. But there were two <poorwordusage> bicyclists riding straight down the middle of the lane in front of me. They were forcing traffic to do 10 mph in a 35 mph zone during rush hour.

There was a constant chorus of horns. Traffic was piled up as far back as I could see. Yet there was a beautiful bike path and walking path running parallel with this street. Why the <poorwordusage> couldn't these two bikers use the bike path? Instead they kept flipping me off for yelling at them. My passenger was a rather quiet Indian women who completely out of character started yelling at them. She even called the police.

These two bikers refused to allow anyone to pass them. They refused to use the bike path. All they wanted to do was control the road during rush hour. And realize these were no just two kids screwing around in traffic. They were riding fancy racing bikes with all the garb to go with it.

Issues like that are my problem with cyclists. Rather than using the expensive bike paths our tax dollars paid for. They insist on causing traffic back-ups and "interfering with the flow of traffic".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and i know from drivers ed class back in the day my instructor specifically telling us that when bikers are on the road they are required to follow all the rules of the road. That includes minimum speeds and traffic signals. That allows means they can be ticketed for "interfering with the flow of traffic".

When bikers are the sidewalk they dont have to follow the traffic laws because they arent on the road. But when bicyclists are on the road they must abide by all traffic laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quetico,

Your experience is exactly why I wanted to revisit this topic. In my mind you are in the right. I am one of those bikers with a fancy racing bike and the ugly spandex. I fully agree that bikers need to follow the rules of the road. Those bicyclists you had troubles with give all of us a bad name. I would like to hope that most of us would have moved over for you and the rest of the traffic. I would have and my friends would have. So hopefully you can know cyclists like me are on your side here.

Even if the laws said it was OK to run stop signs, hold up traffic or just act like we own the road, cyclists would be stupid to do that. It creates enemies and is disrespectful. And someone less tolerant may use that new f150 as a weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I cant lump all cyclists in with the stupid ones. What drove us nuts about the incident above is that there was a beautiful new black top bike path paralleling the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that may always drive you nuts. For the most part avid road cyclists don't use the paths. On a busy road they probably should if available and if there is a bike lane they definitely should be in that. But you rarely see road cyclists on paths. More recreational bikers will be but not the ones with the fancy bikes and gear. I think the speeds a person can maintain on a road bike make many bike paths hard to ride, especially if there are walkers, runners, skaters, etc... I'm not saying we cyclists shouldn't use the path, just that you are probably not going to see this happen. But during busy times a bike path is a really good option both to avoid making enemies of drivers, but also is probably safer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The speed limit on most of the paths in the area is 10mph. I don't know any cyclist that is out riding for a workout and going the speed limit on those paths. I understand your frustration, however I have ridden on both West River Parkway and the path you refer too. Unless they have repaired that path in the last two months, that path is very dangerous to ride a skinny tired bike on. Add all the other path users make it a very dangerous situation for all users when cyclists are riding on paths at high speed.

As for riding on the road itself, it presents its own dangers. Very few drivers on that road are driving under 35mph (the maximum, not the minimum), there are parked cars and pedestrians that need to be avoided. I'll let you do the math on a cyclist being hit by car going faster than 35mph. A smart cyclist will ride more than a car's door width away from a parked car, when was the last time you looked for a person on a bike before you opened your car door. Most pedestrians are looking for cars not bikes so room must be given to people looking to cross the street. Lots of people use West River Parkway to avoid the busier streets, including cyclists. Many of these people are in a hurry and speeding down the road talking on the phone and generally not paying attention.

I'm sorry that you feel bikes belong on the sidewalk, but our taxes paid for the roads that you drive on too. Bicycles are subject to the same rules of the road as automobiles and they are also not to interfere with the flow of traffic. I have read too many posts where people complain about bikes. Rarely in a forum like this do you read a post with complaints about cars. Below is a link to an article on Velonews that was written in response to another article that addressed some very aggressive acts against cyclists and by cyclists. This article addresses road rage and the psychology behind it (not from a cyclists point of view). I found it a very interesting read. You've seen the bumper stickers for motorcycles "Share the Road" well it should apply to bicyclists as well.

http://www.velonews.com/article/82470

I understand your frustration with these two cyclists, but you like "all motorists" lump "all cyclists" into the same category. I find it amusing that motorists who speed up to get through a yellow light will complain about the cyclist who only slows down for a stop sign. That being said, I drive a car, sometimes speed, have gone through a yellow light, have rolled through a stop, have stopped my car on top of a crosswalk, etc. I am as guilty as most.

DT08 wrote a very good post suggesting that cyclists follow the rules of he road and that motorists should share the road. It was very thoughtful and well written. But, as it always happens, his thread turned into a place for motorists to rant about how it sucks to have to slow down and share the road with bikes. All we as cyclists are asking is that you be a safe and courteous driver when you are near us, our life is truly in your hands. Share the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sincerely apologize if I came across as lumping all cyclists into the same category. Thats definitely not my intention. I know most cyclists are respect of drivers and the traffic flow. All I ask is if cyclists must use the road, make sure your allowing traffic to flow around you.

I have no issue with cyclists. Just make sure your being respectful of traffic. I do have issue with these two particular cyclists who insisted on controlling the flow of traffic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
s2h    0

Im all for biking. Love it. But when people are riding on the road slowing traffic, that ticks me off. All it takes is someone to be texting or changing their ipod and there will soon be 1 less biker on the road. There are usually enough back roads or trails to stay off the busy streets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The arguement that bicyclists pay taxes too, does not hold water. Because the only taxes that go to roads are gas tax and tab fees. So when they start buying tabs for their bikes I will be O.K. with them on the roads. But until then they should stay on bike paths. Which is the only thing that taxes pay for bicyclists to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing...in many cities like Shakopee for instance, the tarred "wider" paths ARE for bikes, and the smaller "concrete" paths are for walking. But yet down the road we go. One other rant...RUNNERS stop running down the side of the road when there is a PERFECTLY good sidewalk. I know you want to look all cool and tough but when your under a 2000lb car you wont look so tough then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The arguement that bicyclists pay taxes too, does not hold water. Because the only taxes that go to roads are gas tax and tab fees. So when they start buying tabs for their bikes I will be O.K. with them on the roads. But until then they should stay on bike paths. Which is the only thing that taxes pay for bicyclists to use.

Yes, and the lottery pays for the outdoors! Come on, this is ridiculous. I own a home and pay property taxes, I'm pretty sure some of that money gets used on roads. Farmer's don't have to pay some fuel taxes, does that mean they should stick to the sidewalks too?

Yes, cyclists slow traffic, break laws, and everything else you accuse them of. I'm sure you never speed, always come to a complete stop, pass cars on the inside and pass to close to cyclists. So of course you have a tall soap box to shout from.

MN statutes give cyclists the right to ride on the road, if you want it changed call your rep. Good luck with your fight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Everyone is correct in saying that a converter is the way to go. When hooked up to shoreline or generator power, batteries are efficiently being charged while also providing clean 120v AC and 12v DC power. There may be an additional option to give you the best of both worlds though....   How many 120 v circuits are you planning on having? Is it safe to assume that everything will be on one? Assuming that you will be running a honda or similar 2000 watt inverter-style generator... One 15 amp circuit is about all you will be able to run. I am in the same boat as you are... I have quite a bit of battery capability on board and a generator... but would like to be able to run 120v without having the generator going. What I am thinking about doing is this....     Now... I haven't tried this yet and by no means am an electrician.. But my thought is that my single AC circuit that feeds my outlets would be wired to a male plug. The Line out from my converter would be wired to a household female plug.... And then there is the inverter which already has a female plug. Basically, I can choose which source I want to use to feed the outlets... either inverter or generator. There may be better ways to do this, such as a transfer or 3-way switch - but I think it would be nice to physically know where the power is coming from. To me, this is the easiest way to have the best of both worlds, while ensuring that aren't using your inverter to charge your batteries back through the converter. Any of ya smart guys see why this wouldn't work?
    • Maybe they just stop working as well as the alternatives.   That could be because (speculation on my part) that the organisms that a crawler harness or a crawler on a rig emulate or resemble become less abundant in the fall and minnows have grown to the point where they are attractive to the walleye.   So the walleye are no longer eating bugs or crayfish for example but have switched to minnows.  I do know, based on the writings of a number of people and personal experience, that crawlers lose effectiveness compared to minnows in the fall on Vermilion.   Likewise starting out in the spring, and gradually crawlers become more effective than minnows. 
    • in the fall for walleye. Seems everyone switches to cranks or jigs and minnows in fall. Is there a biological reason why people don't think walleye so will hit a crawler harness in the fall?  Even all articles regarding fall walleye fishing talk more about using cranks or big minnows and dismiss crawler harness use that time of year
    • Went for a nice walk in the woods Sunday. Got one out of two hours of walking. Flushed a few but too many leaves yet. There's birds out their but I think the cool, wet spring affected brood survival.  
    • I donated these shells this week to an outdoor organization. All 500 of 'em!
    • So, Sunday mid morning I'm in a pretty good Walleye bite, two fish from a limit. And I stop to run in and watch the Vikings game.  note to self: Get head examined this week!  No stringers-right!
    • Not sure but if you throw some drab paint on it-it's a Duck Boat!
    • If I were to go back it wouldn't even have been a question.  Hydraulic is definitely the answer.
    • Opening day for grouse in the arrowhead I missed 3 birds and did not shoot at 4 due flying low over Finn. It was foggy raining but I did see 4 moose and a big black wolf. According to my phone I hiked 10.7 miles. sunday started off cloudy but the sun came out. The first trail about 30 yards from the car Finn flushed a grouse it flies up and straight down the trail bang one for one. Finn flushed 3 more birds on that trail but never saw them. The next trail we were walking down a grouse flew down in front of us and the grouse tried to hide in the clover in the middle of the tire tracks. Finn flushed it and went straight up and landed in a tree. Haha dumb bird I made a nice head shot and Finn made the retrieve.   We put on 9.8 miles but I left my phone in the car on two trails. Finn flushed a few more birds but I never fired a shot as they were to low or never seen them. For grouse numbers as high as the dnr said they must not have a great hatch or something. I was hoping to get some young dumb birds for Finn but we did not find them.
  • Our Sponsors