Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
bigbluepirahna

223 vs. 22-250

Recommended Posts

What has more knock down power... .223 or a 22-250.

What has more recoil/noise... .223 or a 22-250.

On a quick look it appeared .223 has heavier grain ammo more readily available in the stores, which caliber actually has higher grain ammo easily available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say 22-250 has more knock down power as far as recoil and noise I have no clue. I think they are both easy to get ammo. Will probably really be easy to get some this deer season with the new laws.

If you realy want to know a good answer look at all the populor ammo guys web sites. Happy Hunting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 22-250 burns a lot more powder than the .223. The reason you will see more loads with heavy bullets for the .223 is the .223 is a service round used by competitors in match shoots. The heavier bullets do better at longer distances in the wind. The popularity of AR-15 type rifles has pushed the manufacturers to put out a wider variety of loads for the smaller .223.

One thing to keep in mind is the heavier bullets in the .223 require a faster twist to the rifling of the barrel. A lot of AR type rifles have 1 in 7 rates of twist for using bullets over 65 grains. The standard rate of twist for most bolt guns in .223 is usually closer to 1 in 12.

Since you asked which has more knock down power the simple answer is the 22-250 by a wide margin. It also makes more noise and probably kicks more. Neither round is much for recoil even from a light gun.

If you are wondering which would make a better deer rifle the 22-250 would have the most power and flatter trajectory. If you are thinking of using either round for deer you need to stay away from certain bullet types. These rounds use the same bullets most of which are designed to vaporize prarie dogs or harvest fur. The plastic tipped and hollow point explosive bullets WILL NOT PENETRATE RELIABLY ON A DEERS VITALS. A couple of other types of bullet available are the full metal jacket and match hollow point neither of which is suitable for larger game.

There are several bullets available for 22 centerfires that are intended for deer size game. Noslers partition is available in a 60 grain bullet and Barnes has a 53 grain XFB. There are probably others. Several ammo companies are now loading these types of bullets in both cartidges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I shoot a .22-250 a lot at the gun range. A lot of shooters have told me that it has a lot of bark to it compared to the .223 bolt actions they shoot. As for recoil it is not much, I shoot 20-30 at times and wouldn't even know it. 45 and 50 grain bullets tend to have a great deal of wind drift. Also like mentioned the .22-250 uses more powder, and the 45, and 50 grain bullets move at 3800-4000 fps unless you reload your own. Being a hot load at that rate of speed heats my barrel up fast when target shooting so a lot of time is used between shots so I don't burn the barrel out. As mentioned this cal. doesn't make a very good big game rifle due to the small grain bullet, not to say it wouldn't kill big game but it just doesn't have the penitration power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gun would be used for deer mechanictim. I am looking at the Ruger 1-B single shot 223. I shoot a 30-06 myself, and have twin daughters coming up that will be asking to hunt with daddy. Normally I would've just got them a 243, but I was talking an ex-law enforcement guy who told me he used to shoot hundreds of deer to control city populations. He said they were instructed to neck shoot the deer with a 223. Never had a problem with the caliber being lethal for deer.

Want to get everyones thoughts on here, if the general consensus is that it's not enough gun, I'll probably go for a Ruger #1 in 243. -Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.223

Velocity max = approx 3100 fps 1280 ft lbs @ muzzle with 60 gr bullet

2738 fps 999 ft lbs @ 100 yds

22-250

Velocity max = approx 3500 fps 1632 ft lbs @ muzzle with 60 gr bullet

3104 fps 1284 ft lbs @ 100 yds

I personally don't feel that a .22 cal is enough to effectively and consistently take deer sized game. The exception to that rule would be an individual who is well trained and suited to place the shot were it needs to be. Your law enforcement buddy is of that sort. The neck is a low percentage shot and I would dare say that most folks can't make that shot. The neck is essentially a spine shot which is approximately 2" across and that is a pretty small target.

I have a niece who started hunting with a .308 chambered in a NEF single shot and she had no problem handling the recoil. Even if the shot was less than perfect, the animal was down in a fairly short time.

If I was selling a gun to you for your girls it would be something no smaller then .243 and no bigger than .308. I would also lean more towards the .308. The .243 is basically a .308 on a diet.

.243 Win. is a .308 Win. that has been necked down to .243. A 100 gr .243 carries about 32 grains of powder and a .308 carries about 43 grains of powder with a 150 gr bullet.

Just my 2 cents. I hope your girls have fun and good luck this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't think the .22 centerfires are deer guns either, but to answer your question the 22-250 is a lot more shell than a .223. Matched with the right premium bullet and with proper shot placement it can be a relatively effective cartridge on whitetails but I'd still prefer a little bigger caliber.

Personally I'd go .243 or 25-06 for your girls with the .308 being another option to consider depending upon the type of shots they'll take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are also wildcats/less used rounds that you can throw into the mix,that seem to have the balistics to hit that happy ballancing point where the light loads meet the heavy loads. off balistics and no personal shooting expierence, don't through out rounds like the 6.5 creedmore, or .223 Arnold, .257 roberts... hit up some reloading manuals and just look at balistics, Ruger No. 1's are chambered in nearly every caliber in reloading manuals, and if ya can't find one you want, the TC Encore is an alternative and thier custom shop keeps the oddball barrels in stock, just not mass marketed, or will make one just for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think love to hunt hit it right square on the nose with 243 being the min. and 308 max. 7mm08 and 260 are also great rounds. And stay away from that neck shot!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the very best deer rifle for youngsters and smaller people is the 6.5 swede. You can buy the swede as a surplus gun and customize it cheaply. It doesn't recoil as much as a .243 and I've seen it knock down big white tails, muleys and many elk. The only draw back is the 6.5 mauser is usually only found in right hand.

I have my FFL and have sold dozens of these nice rifles. I have one customized for myself and it shoots nickel size groups with almost any ammo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    •   Member of ADVRider. Rode with lots of guys on there. I just put out a feeler on here once in a while.
    • You ever check out www.thumpertalk.com Lots of guys in your area.
    • I think that summer one is in the regs, 75 feet as I recall.   
    • I am no expert either but putting my trust in the builder. Talking to him, there will only be enough lumber to screw the sheetrock to. There will be no 16" on center studwalls. He has done several like this with no problems. The "Gurts" are attached to the poles and you could saw the poles off at the bottom and move the whole building.
    • Like Leech said, it appears that a grant in aid trail is running through your area. I would urge you to contact the club president or another representative and try to work out a solution. They may be able to even re-route the trail to avoid your driveway but you will not know unless you engage in a civil discussion with a representative of the club. Just let them know you have concerns and see if an agreement can be had.    I would be surprised if the club doesn't have a landowners event every fall that you could attend and talk to club members as well to keep reminding them each year of your concerns.
    • Forgot this was a day game, missed it but happy we got the two points. We have been holding our spots and even have some games in hand on some other teams. If we can just keep this pace up we are in, but here is hoping we get hot towards the end of the year. Would be nice for a change. 
    • Nice win this afternoon on the road...things are getting interesting....need others to keep stumbling and we may not have to worry about a Wild Card.
    • That's the problem in restrictor plate races--stay on the gas and hit the car in front or lift and be hit from behind.
    • No doubt!   We didn’t have to wonder if there was actual contact though after Dillon said he had a run and just stayed in the gas.   Is what it is.  And that’s the difference I noticed.
    • So no sill plate for the walls on the perimeter then.  OK.     Again, not an expert so whatever your guys say and you’re comfortable with... I don’t know all your construction details. I - sandy County Is just that; sandy.  So it’s not too tough to get a good base.   My experience, as it relates to this, has just been based on building a 36x48 wood framed garage in Isanti County.  8 inch block on the perimeter to support 12 foot sidewalls of 2x6 construction.  My buddy that sold me the lumber said the project was only 200 feet short on interior walls from being a house.  After adding in the attic square footage it had more than my house.  Going with a pole building frame is the game changer.   Again, best of luck. It would be interesting to me to see the completed project.
  • MWO