Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Rick

All Obama, McCain & VP Posts go Here

3,537 posts in this topic

All debate must be at least civil and generally positive in nature. Discussion should be moving issues in a constructive direction. Wild accusations, rants or unsupported statements of supposed fact are not welcome.

Destructive debate is unwelcome here. Nor are links to other sites welcome here.

Campaign mud-slinging type of posts are not welcome. Bashing members in any form are also not welcome.

Try to concentrate on your candidate in your own posts rather than the candidate that opposes your viewpoint.

Good healthy debate moving towards constructive actionable agendas are VERY WELCOME here.

Let's create something we ALL can be proud of.

Great information that truly helps in making an informed decision is what we are looking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here, here!!

Thanks Rick!

Very easy to do. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Let's create something we ALL can be proud of.

Great information that truly helps in making an informed decision is what we are looking for.

They exchange of ideas is a good thing. Just plain old arguing is not.

I have learned a few things and changed my thinking on some stuff I have read down here. That is when I actually thought a little about what the other person was writing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not happy with either choice. Can I write in Rick?

The FM Ticket!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, but who's the veep? Hey, how about WifeKidsandDog? A Paquin/Paquin ticket would make things a lot easier on the Secret Service. gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, but who's the veep? Hey, how about WifeKidsandDog? A Paquin/Paquin ticket would make things a lot easier on the Secret Service. gringrin

What about me? lol laugh Nah, I should finish college first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

few cocktails catfish?

hes not alone. cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

few cocktails catfish?

No, none, actually. And I misspelled it on porpose. Bit of a pun, don't you know. gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, I see your starting to flirt with the 15,000 mark.

If you stay on pace it may be around deer hunting or ice up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quayle.

Gore invented the internet.

I should have known?After I posted I thought Gores to smart Quails kinda a bumbler.

Thanks to Al I'm posting here??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another item in a long list of almost unbeleivable accomplishments by former vice president Al Gore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is nice to see this run away train slowed down a little. Some people started threads to state their view but it was obvious that they were looking for a reaction. I will admit when I found this forum I also probably said a few things I regret. I have stayed away for awhile now for the simple fact that I am not going to change anyone nor will they change me. It is bad enough bickering over polictics but when religon was dragged into it I think that was a little over the top. If someone is not the same religon as you, are they any less of a person as you? I guess the old adage that you should not talk about religon and politics in a public setting rings true here. I am all for a good healthy debate but the mud flinging gets a little old. You should follow your mothers word by not saying anything at all if you can't say anything constructive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Obama campaign says he's inclined to move ahead with debate despite McCain's call to postpone

NEW YORK - Republican presidential nominee John McCain challenged rival Barack Obama on Wednesday to suspend their heated campaign, postpone Friday's debate and work together to deal with the nation's financial troubles.

Obama did not immediately respond to his rival's bold political move, but Obama campaign officials say the senator is inclined to move ahead with the debate.

McCain said the Bush administration's Wall Street bailout plan seemed headed for defeat and a bipartisan solution was urgently needed. The move was an effort by the Republican to claim leadership on an issue that has been troublesome for him at a time when his rival is moving ahead in the polls.

McCain said he would put politics aside and return to Washington Thursday to focus on the nation's financial problems after addressing former President Clinton's Global Initiative session in New York. McCain said he had spoken to President Bush and asked him to convene a leadership meeting in Washington that would include him and Obama.

"It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support the administration's proposal," McCain said. "I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time."

McCain said he has spoken to Obama about his plans and asked the Democratic presidential nominee to join him.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid issued a statement saying the debate should go on because "we need leadership, not a campaign photo op."

The University of Mississippi said it was going forward with preparation for the debate in Oxford. "We are ready to host the debate, and we expect the debate to occur as planned," the school said, adding that it had received no notification of any change in the timing or venue.

My question is can both sides work together and get a solution to this? We were talking at work and the blank check idea was a starting point. That way they can say, this is where we started and this is where it ended.

Do you think Barry will take part in this or will he just vote present?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither Obama nor McCain are needed for the bail-out legislation to move forward. Let the debate go on as scheduled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's plenty of heads to do the bailout,weather it is accepted or not they dont need two Pres candidates to set the mode.

The people do need to see a debate and where these two stand.

Hearing how McCain dislikes debates I guess his thinking as to another disaster,other than natural is a way to avoid a debate and sorry to say he knows debating isnt a strong point for him.I think people will see avoidence on his behalf,and lessen his popularity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither Obama nor McCain are needed for the bail-out legislation to move forward. Let the debate go on as scheduled.

I disagree.

This is a monster issue - and a real first-class, Grade A muck-up.

One of these guys is going to inherit the financial situation, as well as whatever "fix" is put in place. Whether its Obama or McCain taking the oath in January, someone is going to be dealing with the fallout.

I say get both of them ON THE RECORD now, since they are both supposedly still U.S. Senators - being paid by us to do their Senate jobs.

If both Obama and McCain go on the record for a plan/fix, and pull their respective parties along for the ride, we the voters will have a very clear picture of who stands where. Also, if the plan/fix they come up with works, everyone gets a share of the credit, and if it fails, neither can point fingers and blame the other one.

I particularly like the thought of both candidates meeting with Pres. Bush, and allowing the 3 of them to try and hammer out a compromise. That could be more entertaining than tying two cats' tails together and slinging them over a clothesline.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I particularly like the thought of both candidates meeting with Pres. Bush, and allowing the 3 of them to try and hammer out a compromise. That could be more entertaining than tying two cats' tails together and slinging them over a clothesline.....

Now that I can agree with. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I don't know why they cannot do both. Don't we want a leader? You know, someone who "won't blink" and will take on crisis, regardless of how serious or numerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors