Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
reelemin

The right war !

16 posts in this topic

Because we lost focus and followed a so called leader into a preemptive war that had no relevance to 9/11, we now have bigger and worst problems to deal with.

By Jonathan S. Landay and Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers

Wed Sep 10, 7:14 PM ET

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Seven years after 9/11, al Qaida and its allies are gaining ground across the region where the plot was hatched, staging their most lethal attacks yet against NATO forces and posing a growing threat to the U.S.-backed governments in Afghanistan and nuclear-armed Pakistan .

While there have been no new strikes on the U.S. homeland, the Islamic insurrection inspired by Osama bin Laden has claimed thousands of casualties and displaced tens of thousands of people and shows no sign of slackening in the face of history's most powerful military alliance.

The insurgency now stretches from Afghanistan's border with Iran through the southern half of the country. The Taliban now are able to interdict three of the four major highways that connect Kabul , the capital, to the rest of the country.

"I am not convinced we are winning it in Afghanistan ," Adm. Michael Mullen , the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conceded before a congressional committee on Tuesday.

Experts inside and outside the U.S. government agreed that a key reason for the resurgence is a growing popular sympathy for the militants because an over-reliance on the use of force, especially airpower, by NATO has killed hundreds of civilians.

On Wednesday, Pakistan's military chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani , warned that cross-border U.S. missile strikes and commando raids no longer will be tolerated. "The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country will be defended at all cost," he said.

Mullen said he is examining "a new, more comprehensive strategy for the region," an acknowledgement that the current approach lacks coordinated reconstruction and humanitarian programs.

"We cannot kill our way to victory," said Mullen, who warned that the U.S. and its allies "are running out of time."

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said that efforts to capture or kill bin Laden haven't been without "ups and downs." But, she added, the failure to find him says "a lot about the geography . . . where al Qaida decides to hide. And as the president says, Osama bin Laden is not out there leading any parades."

Al Qaida and the Taliban — the Islamist militia that harbored bin Laden while it ruled Afghanistan — were quickly defeated by U.S. airstrikes and opposition forces directed by CIA officers and U.S. commandos after the Sept. 11, 2001 , attacks.

But many extremists fled and regrouped in Pakistan's remote tribal region, in part because Bush declined to use U.S. troops to block escape routes and began diverting resources for the 2003 invasion of Iraq .

Afghans have voted since then in democratic elections, enjoyed greater rights than ever before, and seen the construction of schools, clinics, roads and other infrastructure with billions of dollars in international aid.

The U.S. and its allies have killed and captured thousands of al Qaida and Taliban fighters, including senior and mid-level leaders.

But bin Laden and his inner circle have established new bases inside Pakistan , where they plotted deadly attacks in London and Madrid , and where U.S. intelligence officials say they're plotting new attacks and training recruits. So have Taliban leader Mullah Omar and his lieutenants, who U.S. officials said have been aided by sympathetic Pakistani military and intelligence officers.

With U.S. forces stretched by the war in Iraq , NATO allies unwilling to commit large numbers of soldiers and the Afghan security forces unable to operate independently, U.S. commanders have too few men to contain the revival of the Taliban and its allies.

There are now some 62,000 foreign soldiers in Afghanistan , including 34,000 U.S. troops, and some 150,000 Afghan security forces. They face an estimated 7,000 to 11,000 insurgents, according to U.S. commanders.

Though the guerrillas are no match for U.S.-led NATO forces, U.S. commanders are unable to hold areas cleared of insurgents long enough to establish strong Afghan government control and pursue large-scale development programs.

This year the Taliban have carried out their most lethal attacks against foreign troops, launching coordinated strikes in different areas that combine regular attackers and suicide bombers.

The most serious came last month when over a two-day period the insurgents hit a major U.S. base in eastern Afghanistan with at least 10 suicide bombers and a ground force and ambushed a French-Afghan patrol near Kabul . At least 10 elite French paratroopers were killed and 21 injured, the worst loss of NATO troops in a single incident.

Despite killing many more civilians than the allies have, the insurgents are also winning the all important "information war" for the hearts and minds of the region's deeply religious Muslims, U.S. military officials conceded.

The insurgents' sophisticated propaganda machinery exaggerates civilian casualties caused by foreign forces and reinforces perceptions fueled by U.S. abuses against captured detainees that the Bush administration is waging a war against Islam.

Pakistan has seen an explosion in extremist violence following a succession of U.S.-funded offensives against al Qaida and other militants in the tribal region.

The operations fueled the emergence of Pakistani militant groups that banded together into the Taliban Movement of Pakistan , or TTP, which Pakistan's Interior Ministry chief, Rehman Malik , recently conceded is under al Qaida's control.

The TTP has routed Pakistani security forces, imposed strict Islamic law across the tribal region and extended its reach deep into the country through a campaign of intimidation and violence that has claimed thousands of lives, including that of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in December.

"We've eliminated a lot of important players, but all those players have been substituted," said Christine Fair , an analyst at RAND Corp. , a U.S. research organization. " Pakistan is far less secure than before the launch of the global war on terrorism. It is unquestionable that we are failing in Afghanistan . The Taliban are expanding with alarming success."

TTP fighters are also crossing to attack U.S. troops in eastern Afghanistan , which has seen a 40 percent rise in violence since last year, according to U.S. commanders.

The insurgents' strategy has two major goals: to erode popular support for the U.S.-backed governments in Islamabad and Kabul and to undermine popular backing in the United States and allied countries for continuing the mission in Afghanistan .

They appear to be succeeding, with recent polls in Britain , France , Holland and Canada showing majorities favoring troop withdrawals.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper on Wednesday said that Canada would pull its troops out of Afghanistan in 2011. "I don't really think there will be much appetite among Canadians," Harper said. "I don't think even among the armed forces themselves — although they probably wouldn't say so — much appetite to see rotations continuing the way they've been after six years."

(Shah is a McClatchy special correspondent. Landay reported from Washington.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reel one thing that impressed me about Obama,He stated if Pakistans army and govt.dont start helping flush out the talaban & AlQuida.He'd stop all funding to Pakistan.

I'd bet going back to the stoneage existance they had before our help would open their eyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya know, those yahoos have nukes. Bet they remind us of that sometimes too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reel one thing that impressed me about Obama,He stated if Pakistans army and govt.dont start helping flush out the talaban & AlQuida.He'd stop all funding to Pakistan.

I'd bet going back to the stoneage existance they had before our help would open their eyes.

So if Pakistan were our children, what you're saying Obama wants to do is take away their desert? I myself would prefer to lay the law down, crank down their pants and give 'em a good spanking for what their doing. So to speak. McCain did say he wants to stop funding to all countries that don't care for us. That extends past pakistan. I do agree with letting them go back to the stone age though.

Maybe some of these countries that didn't want to help us fight and are now under attack, should help us out this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I myself would prefer to lay the law down, crank down their pants and give 'em a good spanking for what their doing.

So when are you going to enlist?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was visiting with my uncle last summer. He is a investment banker/farmer in central ND. He has the right idea. He says we should create an APEC. Start charging these countries over in the Middle East a ton for the basic raw material needed to produce the food they eat. A barrel of oil for a bushel of wheat. Make an even up trade. Or better yet, start cutting some of the off completely. If they do not want to play by the same rules, figure out your own way to feed your people.

We came to the conclusion that as oil goes up, the price of wheat and other grains should follow at the same price......

Sounds like a great idea to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reel one thing that impressed me about Obama,He stated if Pakistans army and govt.dont start helping flush out the talaban & AlQuida.He'd stop all funding to Pakistan.

I'd bet going back to the stoneage existance they had before our help would open their eyes.

Pakistan, Iran, Afghanastan, et. al., never advanced from the stone age.

Taking away the money will have the benefit of us being able to spend it elsewhere, which is good. Sending all the troops and bullets in world will not fix Afghanastan, short of killing every living organism in country, which I wouldn't be opposed to... .

Trying to get a strong govt. going which the people will support is the only answer. Like what we've tried to do in Iraq. It's an uphill battle.

It's a war of ideology.

It's hard to beat an enemy that is willing to commit suicide for their cause. They believe, and they're willing to die for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
I myself would prefer to lay the law down, crank down their pants and give 'em a good spanking for what their doing.

So when are you going to enlist?

If they'd take me I'd go in a heartbeat. They don't take people with one kidney and a history of cancer though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Kidd
Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
I myself would prefer to lay the law down, crank down their pants and give 'em a good spanking for what their doing.

So when are you going to enlist?

If they'd take me I'd go in a heartbeat. They don't take people with one kidney and a history of cancer though.

excuses, excuses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth. A Galileo could no more be elected President of the United States than he could be elected Pope of Rome. Both high posts are reserved for men favored by God with an extraordinary genius for swathing the bitter facts of life in bandages of soft illusion. - H.L. Mencken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if Pakistan were our children, what you're saying Obama wants to do is take away their desert? I myself would prefer to lay the law down, crank down their pants and give 'em a good spanking for what their doing.

That's an $11 Billion dessert since fiscal year 2002.

I think they'd prefer the spanking. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
Originally Posted By: Kidd

So when are you going to enlist?

If they'd take me I'd go in a heartbeat. They don't take people with one kidney and a history of cancer though. [/quote']

excuses, excuses.

Dang....wow...are you in the US Mil? Liberals...now I did it, I did some name calling. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very difficult to justify any war but:

this one is very difficult because the enemy Alqueda and the republican guard took off their uniforms and put on their civies and ran home and to Syria and Pakistsan like the cowards they are.

In there wake they left a political and cultrual black hole to be fought over by the starving powers that didn't retreat.

Unfortuneatly that was mostly comprised of people with out means to implement law and order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with going there, although it is time to turn it over to a certain extent. There are problems within our own borders, and just outside of them that are pressing. For those that are against the war, which is totally understandable, know that 95% of the US Mil wants to be there. Respect them for what they are doing, they are kickin tail for us to sit back here and whine about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was visiting with my uncle last summer. He is a investment banker/farmer in central ND. He has the right idea. He says we should create an APEC. Start charging these countries over in the Middle East a ton for the basic raw material needed to produce the food they eat. A barrel of oil for a bushel of wheat. Make an even up trade. Or better yet, start cutting some of the off completely. If they do not want to play by the same rules, figure out your own way to feed your people.

We came to the conclusion that as oil goes up, the price of wheat and other grains should follow at the same price......

Sounds like a great idea to me.

The scarcity of agricultural products versus fossil fuels is completely different. Lots of countries can grow wheat, corn, rice, etc. but not too many can pump oil. But I agree, if it would work, it does sound great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts


    • Ever notice how the politically bias media does everything it can to keep you voting for one side or another, can't let any 3rd parties in because the powers that be lose control. They are doing an amazing job with our minds that is for sure, both sides.
    • I would regulate the drugs just like alcohol, pretty easy actually. Now we would have to draw a line in the sand on what drugs are legal and which to keep illegal, we can't use public opinion for this because that is what got us in trouble in the first place. There have been numerous studies on drugs that at least give us an idea on how dangerous they are, things will get a little confusing because some legal drugs now are the most dangerous but there is no reason to go backwards with those drugs because we have already been there and it didn't work. I can't possibly cover every detail in a post so I am guessing you want to know which drugs to make legal and which should remain banned.

      Lethal dose chart, one could make a case for drawing a diagonal line to the right of caffeine.


      This chart can be a little deceiving because obviously some drugs that are used more than others but it tells an interesting story none the less.


      Another physical harm chart, these may or may not work but again just a guideline on drugs we could consider for legalization.
    • Anyone have one?  Last year they ran them on sale for $200 at the local farm n fleet.  That happens again i might have to gets me one!
    • Before anyone goes out and buys an ION....     Also Dewalt has a 9ah battery now too.   http://www.homedepot.com/p/DEWALT-FLEXVOLT-20-Volt-60-Volt-Lithium-Ion-9-0-Ahr-Battery-Pack-DCB609Y/300610594?cm_mmc=Shopping|THD|G|0|G-BASE-PLA-D25T-PowerTools|&gclid=CjwKEAiArbrFBRDL4Oiz97GP2nISJAAmJMFah6JUW7Wlbuw6Pzzf6CZFbYHwv3JOUaeQnfyiJpPemhoCm_Xw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

    • So should I get a reality show first? Trust me the two parties are going to great job of taking themselves out. I am also unelectable with the current mindset the voters have so don't worry about me.

      In other news who needs Russia when the DHS is trying to hack our elections? Sure they might have been just been looking for weaknesses but it does seem a little unsettling that the fed wants to get their hands on the state systems.
      http://www.computerworld.com/article/3173032/cybercrime-hacking/indiana-joins-idaho-in-claiming-dhs-tried-to-hack-their-election-systems.html
    • Please describe in detail why the war on drugs has been successful and why we should continue with the same policies we have had for the past 3 decades or so.    I am really wondering what the timeline is for these policies to start working.
    •   If you use Prohibition as an example, speakeasies turned into bars and nightclubs, and bootleggers turned into pimps and politicians.  So that option for drug dealers is still open.   Of course if prostitution was legalized, about the only thing left would be to get into politics, so I guess some of them might have to turn to more honest professions like drug counseling or working for the FDA....   Drug stores could still operate under the eagle eye of the FDA and federal revenuers, and keep us all safe.   The big question is what would all the Carrie Nations of the world do?                                        
    •   The Republican party was originally formed as an opposition party to the Federalists, so now that the DNC and the RNC are both federalists, there is still room for a true republican party.
    • Is it happening this year?
  • Our Sponsors