Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MUSKYMAN1011

BIG OIL !

11 posts in this topic

WASHINGTON - Speculation by large investors — and not supply and demand for oil — were a primary reason for the surge in oil prices during the first half of the year and the more recent price declines, an independent study concluded Wednesday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yup, which is why if we started drilling, speculation would show that we would be able to supply our own oil (and natural gas) and if we started to build nuclear plants, speculatino would show even less need for oil.

Thus, oil speculations would drop cost of oil, and it would go down.

Good topic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Swill sounds like you are for nationalising our oil industry.

How did you come up with that conclusion? Nationalization is not what needs to happen. Swill is right though. On all fronts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not for nationalization, we just need to get started asap on all engery fronts. Less talking, start driling, building the pipelines, and selecting sites for nuclear energy.

I think we can get it done very quick if it becomes (which i think it already is) a national crisis. Just take a look at the 35w bridge. Excellent job, and way ahead of schedule.

We Americans can do great things, when we unit, and accept the challenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was curious is all. It looks like the drillers will get their wish. May come down to the states saying ye or ne for oil being drilled in front of their shores. Sounds like a good compromise. Though I don't think it will do much for the market in the long run. That's my opinion. Its good you see a plan that may work stick to it and we may see if it does any good.I wasn't trying to be sarcastic or anything like that just understanding of point of view.

Besides I got my new fish finder from ProFishingSupply and amazed at the technology behind this equipment. GOD BLESS AMERICA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting read on BIG WIND.

Pelosi And The Big Wind Boone-doggle

By Michelle Malkin

August 13, 2008

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently called congressional Republicans who

want up-or-down drilling votes "hand maidens of the oil companies."

Let's call Pelosi what she is: House girl of the Big Wind boondogglers.

Though she seemingly backtracked on labeling drilling a "hoax" this

week, Pelosi refuses to consider GOP energy proposals that don't include

massive government subsidies for so-called eco-alternatives that have

never panned out.

Which brings us to Madame Speaker's 2007 financial disclosure form.

Schedule III lists "Assets and 'Unearned Income'" of between

$100,001-$250,000 from Clean Energy Fuels Corp. -- Public Common Stock.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) is a natural gas provider founded by T.

Boone Pickens. Yep, that T. Boone Pickens -- former oilman turned

wind-power evangelist whose ads touting a national wind campaign are now

as ubiquitous as Viagra promos.

Pickens and Pelosi share the same talking points downplaying the need to

drill and open up more access to American oil. Instead, the Pickens

pie-in-the-sky plan proposes to replace natural gas with wind power in

power generation and theoretically free up natural gas for America's

transportation needs.

All well and good in la-la land, but let's be real about the limitations

and costs of wind power. Past and ongoing experience demonstrates the

unreliability of wind and the miserably low operating capacity of wind

power facilities here and around the world. Depending on wind requires

supplemental fossil fuel plants as backup to be turned on and off to

compensate for wind power supply shortfalls -- nullifying any reductions

in carbon dioxide emissions, which are miniscule, according to the

National Academy of Sciences.

Not to mention the thousands of sliced-up birds and other wildlife that

have become wind power casualties -- a problem scientists say would be

solved by "repowering" old turbines at a cost of untold billions.

Fittingly, the environmental mascot of the Democratic National

Convention -- the showcase of their alternative energy approach -- is an

eastern Colorado wind turbine propped up with Democratic carbon-credit

funds that has never produced any substantial energy because of its

chronic equipment malfunctions.

But I digress.

Naturally, the Pickens Big Wind plan is proudly endorsed by Do-Nothing

Pelosi's friends at the obstructionist Sierra Club. Through another

company, Mesa Power, Pickens has committed upward of $12 billion in wind

farms on the Texas panhandle. CLNE and Mesa Power are separate entities,

but what benefits one piece of the Pickens puzzle benefits them all. The

wind venture, as Pickens himself acknowledges, depends on permanent

federal subsidies.

Pickens is banking on 'em. And Pelosi is banking on him.

As reported on dontgomovement.com, Speaker Pelosi bought between $50,000

and $100,000 worth of stock in Pickens' CLNE Corp. in May 2007 on the

day of the initial public offering:

"She, and other investors, stand to gain a substantial return on their

investment if gasoline prices stay high, and municipal, state and even

the Federal governments start using natural gas as their primary fuel

source. If gasoline prices fall? Alternative fuels and the cost to

convert fleets over to them become less and less attractive."

CLNE also happens to be the sponsor of Proposition 10, a ballot

initiative in Pelosi's home state of California to dole out a combined

$10 billion in state and federal funds for renewable energy incentives

-- namely, natural gas and wind.

Follow the money. Or, to put it in economist's terms as energy analyst

Kenneth Medlock III did in an interview with The Dallas Morning News

about the Pickens multibillion dollar wind farm investment: "A lot of

what he's trying to do is add value to a stranded asset ... he's

obviously got millions of dollars on the line."

And so, potentially, does the Democratic Speaker of the House -- all the

while wagging her finger at the financial motivation of others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michelle Malkin ??? The same Michelle Malkin of FOX fame?

Weren't you the one giving me grief about posting something from the NY Times, calling it a partisan rag, or something? laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NY Times, Us Magazine.

Like one and the same.

Michelle Malkin, very smart and easy on the eyes. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Those sure are pretty snowflakes..........
    • Misguided by love as pure as the driven snow.  
    •   Yep, am with ya......and most of us thank you. Should not be a difficult concept to understand.....except for a select Jv few.
    • So was I.  When I say "my equipment" won't be freezing up when I am hole hopping with the aid of my toasty warm Otter cottage, part of my equipment that won't be freezing up would be the ez ducer...   
    • Reinhardt was sincere, and I don't believe he was trying to sell anything,  He had a lot of knowledge about meat, and simply wanted to share it.   I didn't fault him for his politics, either.  He was simply misguided on that....        
    • I took Mickey in 2008. Bubbles 4 years later. Not too worried about winning as some on here .....as winning in  those years wasn't really winning, and so far, neither is picking the winner in 16, other than saying you picked the winner and "get it".
    • Had an opportunity to tag along with LeeKen to Bluestem Nature Conservancy and sit in a blind Saturday morning.  Thought it was unusual to see a deer with antlers late March.
    •     I was thinking more like Goofy=Pres. Trump
    • Murphy’s Law   I went out this afternoon trout fishing.  I questioned the wisdom of fishing on a robin’s egg blue sky day.  Trout shun sunlight.  I went outside to check the weather. The warmth of the afternoon coaxed me out of the house.     I fished a stretch I have done well on in the past.  I knew because of the bright sun I would more than likely not do well on big trout this outing.  Trout do not have eye lids and shun bright sun. When I got to the stream the outdoor temperature was 58 degrees.  I took the water temperature and it was almost 50 degrees.  That is well within a good temperature range to score some trout.     I hit the water at 2:45pm.  The sun was high in the sky and not a single cloud was in the sky.  I knew from experience that days like these I typically fished the shaded side of the stream.  There was no shaded side of the stream.      The fishing was tough.  I had lots of follows and flashes at my lure.  None seemed to want to commit.   I decided to look for cover for the trout.  I decided anything to throw a little shade on the trout would make them feel comfortable.     The trout had lock jaw.  I decided to target broken water so the trout would feel secure and come out in the bright light.  They still were bashful.  I decided another trick was in order. I was going to throw in the biggest snarly messes and let the lure drop to the bottom and give it a tweak to start the blade going.  Bang bang and I was in business.  This only worked in deep runs and i lost a few lures throwing into the mess.     I ended the outing with 24 brown trout to hand. The biggest was about 16 inches.  It was 5:30pm.  I usually get out at a bridge and today was nothing different.  I stood on the bridge looking upstream.  There was a sweet log jam just upstream of the bridge and it was in shadows.     I decided i was going to go just upstream in the shadows and cast a few more times. I was still on the bridge looking upstream. I looked at my reel and there was a loop on the spool.  This loop needed to be cast out if I was going to continue fishing.  I decided the bridge afforded the best angle and no trees in the way to cast out the loop in my spool.     I cast off the bridge.  The loop caught and dropped my cast about 15 yards upstream.  It nearly didn't land in the water.  It hit tight to the bank and I had a big snarl in my reel.  I looked down and saw my panther martin was barely in the water.  I decided to pull off some line and get this snarl out.  I made even a bigger mess.     I sat down on the bridge rail and started to mess with my giant snarl.  I again looked at my lure and it was barely in the water.  I was worried about losing the lure because of the snarl.  It was safe and barely dangling in the water.     I  really made a mess with the reel.  I was cussing it and trying to untangle it.  I lost focus on my lure in the water. I was peering over my glasses and really putting all my attention on this mess and I heard a splash sound.  I looked upstream and saw nothing.  I looked back at the reel.  I heard a louder splash and looked over the bridge at my lure suspended in the water.     My mouth dropped open wide and I stared in disbelief.  Me messing with the line caused the lure to jig up and down in the water.  This attracted a predator.  Not 2 inches from my lure was a giant trout suspended and staring at the size 9 gold panther martin deluxe waiting for it to move again.     My reel was still messed up so there was no battling this huge female trout on my reel if it decided to quit dancing with my panther martin and eat it. The bridge was at least 15 feet off the water and the idea of battling a monster trout from above was not appealing.  I worked frantically on the snarl.  It got even more messed up.     My fighting with this reel and keeping one eye on the giant female was nerve racking.  She still was very interested in my lure.  She circled it like a shark.  It was more than I could stand.  I decided if I hooked up with her with this less than optimal circumstances I would lose her and maybe kill her because of the bridge nonsense.     I decided to try to catch her another day.  The reel was non functional and i grabbed the line and lifted the lure out of the water.  What happened next is going to be relived in my dreams for the rest of my life.  The monstrous female brown bum rushed the lure as I lifted it out of the water.  It launched itself out of the water snapping at the spinner.  It was a swing and a miss. I got my wits back together and thought about cutting out the snarl and trying for her. I decided a return trip was on the agenda.  As I write this recollection I smile and cuss my circumstances.
  • Our Sponsors