Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BobT

? for Cliffy or any other L.E. officer

8 posts in this topic

Admittedly, one of my pet peeves on the roadways is when I see someone passing on the shoulder. It's even worse when they do it at a crossroad. Not only is this extremely dangerous but totally illegal. I honestly believe that I could almost earn a living working on commission from citations I could issue just driving back and forth to work every day was I to be empowered to do so.

Anyway, I needed to get that off my chest first. Here's my question.

As I leave Alexandria heading east on state highway 27 and near Lake Victoria there is a road that approaches on the left. This is not a crossroad. On the right side of the road as you approach this intersection there is a sign that states "bypass lane." Funny thing is, the white paint on the road edge does not indicate a passing lane. There was a time when it did with the dashed lines and lane markings but over time the dashed lines have been replaced by a solid white line and the lane markings have faded into oblivion.

Which is correct? Is this a legal passing lane or not?

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bob:

I gotta be honest, I dont know the answer to your question. If I understand your question correctly, there is signage that does not match the road markings? I would assume a person would have a good argument either way...very confusing and dangerous.

I wish I could be more help....this seems to be a question better suited for those that work the open roads...such as Deputies or the Maroon Goon squad (Troopers).....or you might just give the Douglas County highway department a call....

Sorry I couldnt be more help.

Cliffy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was always told the markings (paint) told the story. The signage was just to help Identify what you saw on the road. When in doubt.... DONT CROSS THE WHITE LINE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask a Trooper - Andy Schmidt - Fergus Falls Daily Journal article

http://www.fergusfallsjournal.com/news/2008/aug/23/ask-trooper/

Question: On our commute back home in rural Clay County, many people whiz by us on the right shoulder because they are too impatient to wait for us to finish our left turn.

Is it ever legal to pass someone on the right, using the shoulder, when they are slowing down to make a left turn?

Answer: According to MN statute 169.18 sb 4 “The driver of a vehicle may overtake and pass upon the right of another vehicle only upon the following conditions:

(1) when the vehicle overtaken is making or about to make a left turn;

(2) upon a street or highway with unobstructed pavement not occupied by parked vehicles of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles in each direction;

(3) upon a one-way street, or upon any roadway on which traffic is restricted to one direction of movement, where the roadway is free from obstructions and of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles;

(4) when the driver of a vehicle may overtake and pass another vehicle upon the right only under conditions permitting such movement in safety.

In no event shall such movement be made by driving onto the shoulder, whether paved or unpaved, or off the pavement or main-traveled portion of the roadway.”

A note from Trooper Andy here: Above it states that passing on the right may be done “only upon the following conditions.”

It did not say upon one of the following conditions, so to me that means all of the specified conditions must exist and not just one of them.

Now I added the emphasis to the last sentence to help make it clear that “NO,” it is not legal to use the shoulder to pass another vehicle on the right-hand side.

Now at some locations MNDot has painted in another lane on what used to be the shoulder. That is now a lane and not the shoulder and the purpose was to allow the pass at that location.

So the short answer to your question is, “no,” we may not use the shoulder to pass someone on the right side.

If you have any questions concerning traffic related laws in Minnesota send your questions to Trp. Andy Schmidt- Minnesota State Patrol at 1000 Highway 10 West, Detroit Lakes, MN 56501-2205. Or reach me at, andrew.schmidt@state.mn.us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See, what did I tell ya....A brother in maroon with the funny hats have all the answers. I know Andy...been in a few of his classes in the past...good guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It always gets tricky for me, when the second car stops behind the left turn vehical. Can the third car pass the waiting car if all the other conditions are met?Hans

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob T, I think you there just got up in a job not finished or a job done incorrectly. Either the sign has to be taken down or the line has to be painted correctly to honer what the sign says.

I hate it also when people pass on the shoulder. To add to that I hate it when they pass you on the right turn lane

witch is also illegal, sometimes I just want to turn the vehicle into them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the right turn lane is even more dangerous than just using the shoulder because there could be someone in the on-coming lane preparing to turn left and this would put them crossing in front of the passing vehicle. I shudder every time I see this. It not only engangers the life of the passer but the lives of all of the other drivers/riders in the vicinity.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Don't worry Chuck......PF has your back.
    • It's just sooooooooo easy.
    • Speaking of Russia:   A timeline of recent events. 11/28/16 - " Trump’s campaign took him up on it in March. From those meetings, Nunes grew close with retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a top Trump hand who has just been nominated to be the president-elect’s national security adviser. 2/13/- 1) Flynn gets recorded by Intel agencies, we know he discussed sanctions and 2) it was part of a "Peace Plan" involving Cohen, Sater and a Ukranian named Alex Oronov 3) who is now dead. 2/16 - Flynn faces no FBI charges Source 3/20 - Comey announces FBI investigation into members of Trump campaign. Repubs, including Nunes, spend a great deal of it concerned about Unmasking of Flynn from incidental collection. Source 3/22 - Nunes spends his week freaking out about possible incidental collection he's been told about from an unknown source, immediately warns Trump. Source Now to go back to January, Who happened to be at the Breakfast with Flynn in January involving Turkey? Nunes. Where did it happen? Trump hotel in Washington. Source  3/22 - The House Oversight Committee on Wednesday requested documents related to ousted National Security Adviser Michael Flynn from the White House, FBI, Department of Defense and Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Source 3/22 - Schiff now claims there's "More than circumstantial evidence of Collusion (Unrelated to Nunes new info) Source 3/23 - CNN story drops that "The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, The FBI is now reviewing that information, which includes human intelligence, travel, business and phone records and accounts of in-person meetings ." Source 3/24 - Nunes cancels 2nd open hearing with Intel Committee, seemingly for no reason. Source - Albeit today we learned Sally Yates was going to talk about Michael Flynn at this hearing. 3/24 - Manafort, Stone and Page all more or less simultaneously agree to speak with Intel Committee. Source 3/24 - National Inquirer (owned by Trump's friend) very oddly throws Flynn under the bus. Source 3/25 - Claim that Flynn may have cut a deal Source It seems Flynn may be spilling the beans here, which would not bode well for Trump.   Also I didn't even get to today's news about Kushner and Russia.     What do we know VEB? It ran a spy ring in New York City. Here's another fun coincidence:     Prosecuted by our now removed district attorney.
    •   Rentfree.   just because I don't play your stupid game you get all butthurt.     #goodolboysclub   You might want to watch yourself.....the elitists around here have spoken.
    • As I recall the rules say it is not permissible to discuss another member in the Forums.
    •     Might be a dangerous precedent...
  • Our Sponsors