Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
harvey lee

Picture Posting of harvested animals

172 posts in this topic

Its great to see what animals we have all harvested but here are a few helpful tips to have a good looking photo.

1-Lets try to keep as much blood out of the photo as possible.

2-If the harvested animal has a gaping hole or large wounds, it would be nice to just take a photo from the other side of the animal if possible.

3- Please keep all cigs and beer out of the photo.

4- Try to tuck the tongue of the animal back into its mouth.

5-Also, if you can keep the gutted side of the animal out of the picture that also would look better.

Its great when we can harvest a animal and get a photo for a lasting memory and its even nicer if one can take a little time and get the best possible photo to enjoy for years to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are a couple of examples from this spring. My guide took lots of pictures and we moved around to get the best angle. That being said 90+ temps, evening kills, and late night retrivals make most bear pictures a challenge. My advice is to take as many pictures as you have time for (a digital camera really helps).

IMG_0893.jpg

IMG_0838.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They both could have been. However I used a 300WSM. I was grizzly hunting and the blackies were literally everyplace. Certainly differnt than the fall woods in Minnesota! I saw over 50 bear in 10 days most cookie cutters like these two. I did see one monster that had a sow and her cubs up a tree! Only saw one griz and it was too late that day to make a stalk and we never saw him again. Going back next week! Hope to have some more picts!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

got the first doe out of the way on opening day for us (yesterday morning) 6yds. didnt even know what hit her. she just hopped out in the beans and stood there and then tipped over after about a minute.

n63210485_32729832_6272.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know these are not harvested animals but I had to post them.

these pics are from my folks in cimmerron New Mexico in their back yard and the nieghbor back yard.these were sent to me email sorry they are just bit blurry

bucks008.jpg

bucks007.jpg

bucks006.jpg

bucks005-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice looking deer. I love looking at them shots and looking at the deer, and there sitting there wondering what is going on with a stoned look on there face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well #1 I'm proud of myself for finally getting around to this pic posting thang!

#2 Below is a pic of a buck I got last year in Saskatchewan. I feel it's a decent pic of a buck and learned some tricks from the boys up there.

In general, obvioulsy the best time to get a pic is right away when the animal is "fresh" and not field dressed. #1 this makes the animal appear more natural and filled out. #2 There is less blood or possibility of blood to get spread over the animal. Personally, I always try to get the animals legs tucked back under the animal and have the camera sitting low and shooting up slightly to the animal.

Now back to my deer...The pic is taken the day after I shot it. after field dressing the deer I cleaned it off with snow (it wasn't that bloody anyway). The boys then brough it into the shed and left it on the floor propping open the back legs and chest cavity to cool. They then tied the head up by the rack so that when it stiffened up over night the head would be in a more natural pose and one would have to fight with it. They then cleaned off the mouth/nose area and actually stuffed the nostrils with papertowls to soak up any blood that would try to seep out overnight.

Hope this may have sparked some thoughts or at least you enjoy the pic below. I know I did!

Saskdeer-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice buck WW and an even better picture. I wish more people would spend a few extra minutes in prepping for a photo. Sure makes a world of difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thought i would put this pic up of my cousin who stuck this guy monday night i believe his first deer w/ the bow ever i think it weighed around 170 shot near new ulm

jakesbuck.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it'd sure be nice to have a legitimate chance at something like that at home but when it's small wood lots and varying degrees of what's a "shooter" buck, I guess that's what we're left with. There always seems to be at least one "good" one around home so you just keep your fingers crossed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best advice I have for taking pictures of your trophies is to take a lot of pictures! The more you take the better chance one will turn out great.

I usually hunt alone so I need to utilize the timer function on my camera. This actually works great because you get a low angle on the deer which makes the background look better and you can be assured that no one is shaking the camera. I usually set the camera on a log or rock in the area.

These photos are from last year. All but the first picture utilized the timer function. I am a big fly fisherman, so the first picture is the classic fish porn, with a gun instead of a fly rod and a deer instead of a trout. The second picture was also taken at the seen of the kill. The third is after I drug him out of the ravine and loaded him on the wheeler so I could haul him out. The last two are after I hosed him off and took him to a scenic part of the farm my mom grew up on.

gun_down.JPG

kill_site.JPG

4_wheeler.JPG

side_view.JPG

front_view.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

even if the pics were bad ones, i still get the general idea that deer is a dandy indeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get adobe photoshop and you can just get rid of all the blood and beer cans the high tech way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
    • Well Molly doesn't have any snow on her.   You been drinkin?  
    • 70 pages dealing with Donald Trump and I can't find much that says anything on the positive side, of course in the past year and a half he hasn't said much that's been positive either.
  • Our Sponsors