Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Rotwieler

My first bird dog and his first season any tips?

20 posts in this topic

I have a seven month old German Shorthair. I will be taking him out for his first grouse season this year. I know he isnt gun shy and loves retrieving his grouse dummy(scented). I havent ever trained a hunting dog before what tips can you guys offer for a newbie?

Thanks for the help!

Rott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a pups first season should be nothing but fun, let'em run chase birds make mistakes and let them learn. They can do no wrong the first year. You will 13 or so years for formal training.

Ben

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I. Go buy "How Birddogs Train Themselves" by Baily. Go to Amazon you can probably get a copy shipped to you for under $10. It is short and a very very good thing for a first time versatile dog owner to read.

II. There are two tips:

(1) For all bird dogs - get them out as much as possible and on as many wild birds as possible.

(2) For pointing dogs - try to only shoot birds that the dog has pointed. You want retrieves too, but the dog needs to learn that it's his job is to find birds, point birds, then it's your job is to shoot birds and then he can go fetch up the birds the birds.

(2) is harder than (1), but it can be the difference between your pointer developing into a strong pointing and holding dog rather than a flash point and flush dog (not the end of the word but that's why we buy V-Dogs and not PLs).

Best of luck! Hopefully the grouse numbers are up. You picked a great breed to work with!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the book By Baily. I also agree with Kentuck Ike as well on his point. The only thing I can add is patience, patience, patience, patience....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pretty much what I did with my Britt last season. Tried to make sure it was a fun experience. You can really tell the difference from the beginning to the end of the season with him. He was only 9 months old for pheasant opener and after about half day of figuring out what to do he caught on pretty quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rather than a flash point and flush dog (not the end of the word but that's why we buy V-Dogs and not PLs).

Curious what you mean by this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely let the dog have fun. Might want to go with just yourself and the dog, no huntin buddies. Your buddies might get [PoorWordUsage] like mine did when my 8 month lab was flushing pheasants 100 yds ahead of us, he was having a ball smelling and chasin them. Couldnt help but laugh he was having so much fun, He did chase down 6 winged birds. If you have an e-collar for the dog make sure he is use to it and your use to it. Be patient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with what fishroger said except for the e-collar part. Just let the dog have fun and praise it when it does right. In my labs first season she flushed many birds 100 yards away but as soon as she flushed it, she came right back. She was so excited about the birds I didn't want to curb that in any way. Now in her third season, she hunts within 30 yards of me.

Let your buddies know you have a younger dog and that it will not be perfect. If they are going to get mad, then don't bring them. Hunting is about having fun and I have the most fun hunting while I am watching a good dog work or a new dog learn.

When you watch your pup learn and succeed, sometimes you will be so proud and happy, you mave even forget to shoot! It happened to me. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend hunting alone with the pup at first. Make sure he stays ahead of you all the time, stop hunting if starts walking behind you because he is tired. Dont go walking down trails and expect the pup to go through the thick stuff, you have to get in there with him or the pup will just want to hunt trails. I usaully will not bring a pup on trails we just hunt straight through the woods. Have fun with the dog and remember he is a puppy and dont expect to much from him his first year. It is key to get him on all the birds you can.

I live about 60 miles north of Duluth if you want to run your dog with an other pointing dog at some time. But my dog is trained to have a far range and thats not for everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, great stuff. I was often told to hunt the dog my itself. While not always possible (hunting is often times a group/family activity) I agree that it is a good idea. Second, making sure that the pup is staying out ahead is great advice. I would often stop and have my pup make his out ahead then do my best to follow along. Thick cover can slow a pup down. I had to slow down too.

Finally, PL means Pointing Lab. I often hunt behind a lab bred to point. He pins birds as well as any dog I have ever seen - when he feels like it. Otherwise he is a flushing dog working best when he stays under the gun. I have heard testimony that PL's can be broke completely to wing and shot, or even to fall. However, what is far more likely (in my opinions and ithat of several well thought of professional trainers I have discussed the training of PLs vs. the training of "true" pointing breeds with) is that a PL turns into what is commonly in the v-dog or pointing dog community referred to as a meat-dog. A meat-dog is a dog that will point a bird until the hunter gets close enough then flush the bird on its own rather than having the hunter move ahead and flush it.

Again, there is nothing wrong with this kind of hunting. It can put a lot of birds in the bag and be tons of fun. In fact some people will even train a previously broken dog to flush on command - heck the dog knows where the bird is. In general, however, people purchase versatile breeds or pointing breeds because they want a full time pointer who holds the bird until the hunter, rather than the dog, flushes the bird.

I do not hold myself out as an expert on PLs nor do I have anything against them. There are lots of reasons to own labs. I grew up with one. Further, the only times I personally have seen labs point it has been done very well, just not consistently. The generalization that I share was shared with me by people I respect, who have bred and worked with PLs a great deal. Not only am I convinced based on these first hand accounts, but to me it makes a great deal of sense that a breed originally bred to retrieve waterfowl, then adapted for upland hunting, and now to point, cannot be expected to consistently perform in the same manner as breeds who have been consistently bred for that very reason.

It is based on this same reasoning that I refuse to believe that Setters, Shorthairs or Pointers will consistently outperform Labs or Chessies when it comes to retrieving waterfowl. Many can do the work (for instance my Wirehair's Sire earned his HRC his brother earned his MHRC, and I know that there are PLs who have out performed pointing breading in specific field competitions), but there is a reason it took 100 plus years of thoughtful breeding to get the different breeds to where they are at and why people choose their dogs accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, and there certainly are those PL's or labs in general that will do just as you describe (probably many of them). There are also many out there that are very good at pointing, are consistent, and are not at all like what you describe. Unfortunately there are many people breeding PL's (or so called) and many are not up to the standards of PL's should be (not saying this is the case for the people you speak with). Combine that with the training that goes into them and you can find many reasons why you may see/hear what you do. I will say that buying a PL is not a given that it will point....however there are many good breeders of them out there and many good dogs that come out of these breeders that are consistent. The people that take the time to train them properly and get the dogs on birds (lots of birds) many times can and do have consistent PL's. I don't think the majority get their dogs on enough birds though, and don't hold to standards when it comes to shooting any birds that fly. All these things play a role in developing the PL.

As far as testimony you have heard that PL's can be broke to STW, STS, STF.......I guess I don't understand what the issue is there or what problems they had training steady to fall. There's no reason a lab can't be trained to be steady to fall. As far as what you describe as a meat-dog....you don't think additional training could help with that? I would have to think that there are some v-dogs that break point and flush....and require additional work. Were the dogs that would break in and flush at all steady to wing, shot, or fall? I'm just wondering if additional work/training could be done vs. just making it sound like these same things don't happen with v-dogs.

Sorry to get off topic......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean zero disrespect Hemi. It really sounds like you and I are on the same page. I am quite sure that with additional work PLs which do point can be fully broken, and it is for sure the case that many GWPs, GSPs, WPG....etc. end up as meat-dogs.

BTW - I do not use the term meat-dog in a derogatory manner! IMO a dog that really figures out how to handle wild birds and put them in front of the gun is a great dog. By my standard (the correct standard for evaluating gun-dogs;) a well bred PL has as good of a chance to become a great dog as any V-Dog...I have no doubt what-so-ever.

All I am saying is that there should be no such thing as a V-Dog that does not point. Period. Further, IMO correct breeding has brought v-dogs/pointers to the a place where pointing, at least to the handler's flush, should happen on its own with nothing more than proper rearing, bird introduction and time in the field. Training is meant to speed up the process and/or to add manners as desired.

One last example. An English Pointer just passed as the NAVHDA invitational earning the title of Versatile Champion (VC). There is some MAJOR water work that goes along with that. Any lab or chessie owner would be proud to own a dog that passed the water portion of the Invitational...no doubt. If I were to buy a puppy out of that EP and it was not a water-bug I would be upset, but what the heck I'm buying an English Pointer. Now, if that same pup did not point...it would be going back to the breeder. IMHO, you could tell the same story about a great PL and flip flop water work for pointing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for the tips! good stuff, i have another quick question about training. I was playing with Gunner and a laser pointer in my livingroom. I thought it was really cool he would point at the red dot! I'm worried though i might be teaching him to use his eyes though instead of his nose? or to look for red dots?

Should i not do this anymore?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about it. I used to torment my GSP with a laser pointer as well. She loves chasing that dot around, although wouldn't point it. The reply to your original post sums it up. Let the dog have fun. Don't put too much pressure on it. Let it explore and enjoy the experience. They aren't going to be a champion hunter the first year out. It'll be frustrating at times but don't let it show too much. Keep with the basics and the dog will learn by what it's bred with. Even at four years old my dog is tough the first day until it gets back into the swing of things, and then it's nothing but fun....fun for both you and the dog. The first year out with my GSP wasn't that great, but the second year was a totally different dog. The switch was turned on and it was all business. You may be frustrated at times, but remember that practice makes perfect. Put as many miles on as you can with the dog, and going alone with the dog helps at first so it's not too distracted. Hunting with someone else who may get upset at your dog's behavior will make you upset that it isn't doing what it's supposed to do, and it will translate to the dog as well. Keep it positive!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood Frank and no disrespect taken! It just seemed that some may take some of what you said the wrong way with respect to PL's.....so I was hoping to clear a few things up. I don't find meat-dog derogatory in any of its meanings....so no harm there. My current lab is a meat-dog (and a good hunter but being retired because of health) in terms of his overall training (not the pointing way you describe it as).....but the new puppy will not be (hopefully in any meaning of it).

PL's are trained to be steady (broken) all the time....just as other breeds are. Whether that's to fall or not is up to each individual.

All I am saying is that there should be no such thing as a V-Dog that does not point. Period. Further, IMO correct breeding has brought v-dogs/pointers to the a place where pointing, at least to the handler's flush, should happen on its own with nothing more than proper rearing, bird introduction and time in the field. Training is meant to speed up the process and/or to add manners as desired.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel a lot better!!!

the one thing I have been worried about is that my dog would be 100 yds ahead of me, he is the opposite of that he wont go more than 30 yds ahead of me without stopping. he wants to be next to me all the time(this could be bad).

He must have good Parents because i KNOW i'm a crappy trainer. Reguardless if he finds one bird or not this season he is still a good buddy to have around! thank you guys for telling me what to expect out of a first year pup.

Sorry for him he gets his nuts cut off tomorrow, so he wont be ready for opener. hopefully he can forgive me!

I hope everyone that reads this that they are in good health and have a good season. i'll have more Questions as the season goes on shocked I could only hope our pups meet on the trail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1) He's a baby...once he figures out the birds are in front of you he'll leave your hip pocket. He may just need a little coaxing.

(2) Don't worry about range. Pointers should point and hold the bird. A GSP is not a flusher and does not need to hunt within gun range. If the dog does begin to range out way past where you feel comfortable you can always hunt him with a check cord a couple of times and he will shorted up. It's always easier to range dogs in that put range on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always easier to range dogs in that put range on.

Bingo. I've got a shorthair pup just about a month younger, and I picked her from the litter specifically because she looked like she loved to run and range, which has turned out to be the case. Admittedly she's a bit high strung for some people's tastes, but as for me, I'd be much more concerned if she didn't do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is Gunner, the end of his second time out in the field he has surpassed my first season expectations incredibly. I couldnt be more proud of him!

ht80917011.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors