Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MUSKYMAN1011

How many Yards for AP

31 posts in this topic

How many Yards is Adrian Peterson going to have against the PACK?

Over 100 ?

Over 200 ?

I think he will have less than 300

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will have less than 300

LOL, 175

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

62 yards on 20 carries 1TD.

Defense will put 8 in the box because Jackson can't throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

62 yards on 20 carries 1TD.

Defense will put 8 in the box because Jackson can't throw.

They will do this, until Jackson throws a couple TD's. Hopefully GB didnt plan their Defense around the "8 in the box" because they will get burned!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: mnwild
62 yards on 20 carries 1TD.

Defense will put 8 in the box because Jackson can't throw.

They will do this, until Jackson throws a couple TD's. Hopefully GB didnt plan their Defense around the "8 in the box" because they will get burned!

You will see 8 in the box and Tjack will struggle with his accuracy & receivers! AP will get 60 - 70 yards. Ryan Grant rushed 25 times for 119 yds and a TD against the Purple at Lambeau last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will do this, until Jackson throws a couple TD's. Hopefully GB didnt plan their Defense around the "8 in the box" because they will get burned!

Now thats funny....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the SPOTLIGHT, I hate to be negative but he didn't show much the last few games last year and I KNOW it's preseason but didn't look to impressive. I'm sure he knows that and I'm sure the team knows that, so he will rebound and get 150 with one 50+ yard TD. Tjack will burn them, darn it I can't wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will say in the 90's. They will contain him for the most part, but he will break a few and probably a couple over 25 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many did he have against SF last year?

That's my number.

hehe.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Vikes put 8 men in the box and make Rodgers beat them. I take AP with 8 men in the box over Grant anyday.

More pressure is on Rodgers than TJ,, at home, monday night and AP is the only true stud on either team.

Vikes 25 Pack 15.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AP gets around 90 yards on 15 touches.

He will score on a screenpass.

Rodgers will not have much time to throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AP will get 138 yards rushing - 1 TD plud 48 yards recieving and 1 TD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Vikes put 8 men in the box and make Rodgers beat them. I take AP with 8 men in the box over Grant anyday.

More pressure is on Rodgers than TJ,, at home, monday night and AP is the only true stud on either team.

Vikes 25 Pack 15.

Tjack will have more pressure on him facing 8 in the box because he doesn't have studs like Jennings and Driver to throw to. Ryan Grant was only 2nd to LT last year in yards from week 8 thru the end of regular season. 4 studs on defense...Woodson, Harris, Kampman and Barnett.

Grant rushed 25 times for 119yds for an average of 4.8 per carry and a TD last year in Lambeau against the purple. I'll take my chances with Grant. I do think AP is a stud though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Vikes put 8 men in the box and make Rodgers beat them. I take AP with 8 men in the box over Grant anyday.

More pressure is on Rodgers than TJ,, at home, monday night and AP is the only true stud on either team.

Vikes 25 Pack 15.

no reason to put 8 in the box when featuring a running back that was created by favre.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Mudcutter
I think the Vikes put 8 men in the box and make Rodgers beat them. I take AP with 8 men in the box over Grant anyday.

More pressure is on Rodgers than TJ,, at home, monday night and AP is the only true stud on either team.

Vikes 25 Pack 15.

Tjack will have more pressure on him facing 8 in the box because he doesn't have studs like Jennings and Driver to throw to. Ryan Grant was only 2nd to LT last year in yards from week 8 thru the end of regular season. 4 studs on defense...Woodson, Harris, Kampman and Barnett.

Grant rushed 25 times for 119yds for an average of 4.8 per carry and a TD last year in Lambeau against the purple. I'll take my chances with Grant. I do think AP is a stud though.

If you going to count 4 studs on def being the same as 4 AP's-- your nuts--- if so then the Vikes have a comparable DEF. Pat and Kevin- Winfield and Allen, not to mention EJ.

Nobody on either side of the field of both the pack and the vike can match up to the athletic ability of AP. The guy is freak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of freaks, could you imagine having Moss and AP on the same team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of freaks, could you imagine having Moss and AP on the same team

its a good thought, but we would have never been in position to draft peterson if moss was on the team, now if they would have traded a 4th round pick to get moss back we wouldn't have ever had to worry about a defense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AP 105 yds rushing w/1 TD. They will let chester do the dirty work near the goal line. Rodgers out in the 1st quarter with a torn MCL smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our QB could be TB with LT & AP as RB’s

and RM and BB as WR’s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope that Rodgers doesnt get hurt, just want him to be ineffective. AP I am hoping at least a 100 and a score.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I have seen 3 different flocks of Swan's in the past week. I have also seen small flocks of little birds that look to be migrating.
    • MCI:   Sorry, but Waylon's only interests in life are ducks and my dirty laundry. I didn't start really getting into the shed hunting until recently so I didn't train him for it. I will probably do so with my next pup. He just tags along.   With the increase in popularity of shed hunting there is plenty of information out there. I know a few shed dogs and I know it's not as easy to get them excited about old bone then about a nice stinky duck, but definitely possible. The guys I know also compete in local shed competitions (staged courses) , so if you look into that type of thing there should be a group of guys with a lot of knowledge.
    • Trump is the enemy of the truth ! 
    •   Shouldn't be hard to come up with a way to fill a 1/4 inch gap, it seems to me.   Rip some strips of something, maybe even that synthetic decking, trex or something.    Then you could have the vinyl
    •   *marks "leech brings up someone's location as evidence their opinions are not relevant" on sillytown bingo card*   I'm one "big dave says you just don't understand freedom" away from a BINGO!
    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       
  • Our Sponsors