Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Scott M

The fantasy scoop on MN and AD

3 posts in this topic

Yahoo Juggernaut Index. Team 14: Minnesota Vikings

by Andy Behrens

There's no question that from a fantasy perspective, Minnesota is pretty much just Adrian Peterson, a defense, and various B sides.

But if you're in the camp that believes Peterson is a generational talent, and that his pro career didn't peak in the 296-yard game, then you're OK with this ranking. In fact, you might not think it's high enough.

Without revisiting old arguments, I'll just point you here and here and say that Peterson's ceiling is higher than anyone else's. He's the only back in the league who can openly discuss the possibility of a 2,000 yard, 20 touchdown season without sounding particularly arrogant or unrealistic. Peterson ran for 1341 yards and scored 13 TDs as a rookie, and needed only 238 carries and 14 games to do it.

This year, he'll be better.

"I feel totally different," Peterson said.

Peterson said he is more comfortable with the offense and feels like a more complete back, capable of playing on every down. He spent the offseason gaining a better understanding of blocking schemes and protections ... "He's stepping up his game professionally," running backs coach Eric Bieniemy said.

The Vikings' offensive line is exceptional, and you can expect Peterson to have a greater workload in 2008 -- more receptions, more carries, more scoring. I'm drafting Peterson first overall without hesitation.

If there's one criticism of him that's repeated more often than any other, it's that he has an injury history, including an LCL tear last season. You'll often read that he's an upright runner. (This is a trait that hominids developed, like, six million years ago. Adrian Peterson is the only one of us who's ever criticized for it). The comment is typically followed by the suggestion that Peterson will inevitably get injured.

Well, it's true. In the NFL, injuries are inevitable...for everyone. LaDainian Tomlinson sprained an MCL last year, Steven Jackson missed four games, Joseph Addai missed one, and Brian Westbrook has never played 16 games in any of his six seasons. Those are your draft's top five picks. There is no such thing as an NFL running back who's impervious to injury. Peterson is not an exception to that rule.

He just happens to be Earth's most dangerous ball carrier, when healthy. There's no doubt that if you draft Peterson, you'll need to also draft Chester Taylor. He's an excellent complement to Peterson in real-life, and a required handcuff in fantasy. Taylor averaged 5.4 yards per carry last season, which wasn't too far behind Peterson (5.6), and he scored seven touchdowns. Running behind Bryant McKinnie, Steve Hutchinson, and Matt Birk has its advantages.

Taylor's ADP at Mock Draft Central is 86.52, so it's not like you can wait until the end of your draft to get him. In weeks where Peterson and Taylor both played last season, Taylor averaged 8.7 carries per game. That number may not be quite as high in 2008, but Brad Childress has said that Taylor "knows there are going to be plenty of carries in there for him."

The Vikings were second in the NFC in rush attempts per game last season (30.9) and first in rushing yardage by wide margin, so that's undoubtedly true.

Minnesota also happened to be last in the NFC in pass attempts per game (27.0) and next-to-last in passing yardage (2,938). They've added Bernard Berrian to play alongside Sidney Rice, and those two place 33rd and 43rd in our preseason WR ranks. If a receiver is outside the top 30, however, it means they're not considered an ideal Week 1 fantasy starter in public leagues. Berrian is a terrific deep threat -- or at least that's the only use Rex Grossman found for him -- and the 6-4 Rice is a red zone target who made a few spectacular plays last season. Bobby Wade had the most useful fantasy game of his six-year career in Week 17, but the Minnesota offense isn't likely to produce three ownable receivers in 2008.

Last year, quarterback Tarvaris Jackson threw 12 interceptions in 12 games, and he completed only 58.2 percent of his passes. While Jackson's coaches and teammates have been unflinchingly supportive, it's clear that Minnesota had a brief, intense interest in Brett Favre -- and there would have been no "open competition" between those two. The Vikings also drafted former USC quarterback John David Booty with the second pick of the fifth round (it was their second pick in the draft). He's a reasonable late flier in dynasty drafts.

Jackson is No. 24 in the composite QB ranks, so he's really only recommended in leagues where you're starting two quarterbacks.

It's no exaggeration to say that the Vikings defense carried a few fantasy teams last year. They were the No. 2 overall DEF (178 points), and they've since added Jared Allen. He led the NFL in sacks in 2007, finishing with 15.5. Minnesota obviously plays in a division with a pair of reckless quarterbacks (Kitna, Grossman), so you can expect them to create turnovers, some of which are likely to end in TDs. There are a few IDP plays in Minnesota, obviously. The best of them figure to be LB EJ Henderson (119 tackles, 4.5 sacks), DE Allen and LB Chad Greenway (105 tackles).

***********************

Interesting take I thought on Minnesota and Peterson. Peterson's value goes sky high if T Jack can show anything in the passing game to keep those 8 man fronts away. This isn't the 98 Vikings, but there could be an interesting mix of play calls to keep defenses honest. You'll remember the 98 Vikes ran a lot of draws to keep defenses closer to the line to open up the passing game. You could conceivably see the opposite in 2008, with lots of flys or posts to keep guys off the L.O.S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL. YES!!!!!!!!!

TAKE IT AWAY...

INTERN GUY!!!!....

LINE 1!!!!!.....

TENNA B!!!!!...

P.A.!!!!!!!!!!!.....

LMITOUT!!!!!

BTW, I prefer the spanish version grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Single payer is in our future whether we like it or not. No sense in fighting it. If the Republicans fail to do anything meaningful with health care, Democrats will fire up the base again with single payer and the Republican run will be short lived. 
    •   All politicians are narcissists, some just more than others and they also like the monetary benefits that go with the position. Trump actually stated at one time he didn't really want to be President, but he was the only one who could do the job.
    •   You might get an official "Make America Great Again" cap. (made in China, of course)      
    •   Then what? Do I get a prize? 
    •   I don't think Trump really wants the job either, and I'll put Obama, Hillary and Gary Johnson in that category too. Sure they all wanted to be president but none of them actually wanted to do the job.
    •   Why don't you show us YOURS then?
    • I was referring to the spool for the ez ducer icing up not your spools on your rods...
    • I'm in 100th place overall after three events. I always suck making picks on Toledo Bend though
    • Well another year in the books for us on Winnipeg.  We fished Thursday-Saturday, just left right away Sunday morning without fishing.  Accessed out of Warner.  Thursday access was great, but by Sunday morning, it was sloppy with some deep ruts and puddles.  Lots of trucks parked out along the road.  All water depths measured from the bottom of ice.  Water was dirty straight out from the mouth, but clear out deep and farther west.  Eagles nest was dirty at 11.5fow but clear at 12.5fow.  Seemed to be an "umbrella effect" with the dirty water and the river pushing it straight out.   Thursday- We went straight north of Warner about 4 miles and started in 17fow.  Only caught a couple, then moved east to the ridge in 19fow.  Caught a few more small ones and one guy had a 25"er.  From there we tried a few spots out deep, 22-24fow.  Very slow out deep, only caught 2-3 in the couple hours we were out there.  Mid afternoon we headed south to the ridge in 20fow, pretty slow again.  In the evening we moved back NW to the spot on the ridge we were at in the morning and had a better evening bite there.  I had a nice one get off halfway up, but other than that all smaller ones.  Every spot we tried we caught at least 1-2 fish, but it was a grind.  Ended the day with 26 fish between 4 guys but only one over 20".  Best baits were pink/silver flutter spoons and purple rattle baits.   Friday-  Started out by the ridge again in 19fow caught 5-6 in that spot.  Friday started pretty slow for us.  By the later part of the day we were on the North side of the ridge in 19.5fow, right were the ridge turned to go North.  We found better fishing about 150-200 meters off the ridge.  Ended up sitting on one smaller area for the rest of the day and did fairly well.  Ended up with close to 60 fish between 4 guys on the day, with the biggest coming right at the end, a nice 27.5"er.  Best baits were purple rattle baits.  Gold rattle baits did fairly well earlier in the day.   Saturday- We woke up early and tried in 16fow right at first light, only marked a few with no biters.  Moved out to the North side of the ridge and same thing, managed to catch a few but only after going through the whole tackle box to find something they liked.  Moved about a half mile to the east and sat in the shelters to get out of the wind until about 330.  Had a few bigger schools of fish come through, at one point 2 of the guys caught 7 fish in 5 minutes.  The bite seemed to get better as the day went on.  We moved back to the west about half a mile to where we were Friday evening.  The bite there was good and we figured out that the fish wanted blue and silver rattle baits and blue and silver spoons.  We ended up catching 20-30 fish in that one spot from 330-dark.  In that time we had a 26", 26.5", and a 27".  So if we count that 27.5" from Friday, that was 4 fish 26" or bigger out of that one little spot.     Ice was in great shape.  Travel was very easy.  Crossing the ridge on ATVs wasn't that bad at all, used the ramps to cross only 2 times and found other spots to cross without ramps.  All 3 days the bite seemed to get better as the day wore on.  Most consistent bite for us was 200pm or later in 19-20 fow on the North side of the ridge.  What the fish wanted to bite on seemed to change by the hour.   I think we will be back next year, but only 1 trip, not 2.  

    • Everyone is gouging the people.
  • Our Sponsors