Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
savageangler

$684.93 per day reality check

5 posts in this topic

Do you thing they are out of touch with the average American? I do.

Obamanomics - Is $250,000 per Year Rich?

Posted By:Ariel Nelson

Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama wants to raise taxes on Americans making over $250,000 per year. That may seem like a lot of money, but it depends a lot on where you live.

Someone with an income of $250,000 in Paducah, Ky., for instance, would need to make $586,000 in New York City to maintain the same lifesytlye. So, maybe Uncle Sam needs to work in a cost-of-living component to the tax code.

Using a cost of living calculator from Bankrate.com, we compared what $250,000 translates to in various parts of the country. Here's is a sample of what we found:

In contrast, a person making $250,000 in New York would only need $106,000 to live in Paducah. The biggest driver of the cost differences is housing. A comparable home in New York would cost $1.1 million vs. $0.2 million in Paducah. Rent for a comparable apartment, would be $3,425 vs. $550 per month.

Other costs are also significantly higher, but are much smaller in absolute terms - a doctor visit is nearly double, a hair cut is 50 percent higher and even bowling is three times more costly in NYC.

You would expect consumer goods players like Proctor and Gamble [PG 70.08 0.24 (+0.34%) ] and Coca-Cola [KO 53.83 0.31 (+0.58%) ] and retailers like Wal-Mart [WMT 59.67 0.67 (+1.14%) ] and Home Depot [HD 27.35 0.33 (+1.22%) ] to take these factors into account in their pricing models. So should the government think about cost of living when discussing income taxes? People in higher cost areas like New York and California might vote yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you thing they are out of touch with the average American? I do.

Obamanomics - Is $250,000 per Year Rich?

Posted By:Ariel Nelson

Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama wants to raise taxes on Americans making over $250,000 per year. That may seem like a lot of money, but it depends a lot on where you live.

Someone with an income of $250,000 in Paducah, Ky., for instance, would need to make $586,000 in New York City to maintain the same lifesytlye. So, maybe Uncle Sam needs to work in a cost-of-living component to the tax code.

Using a cost of living calculator from Bankrate.com, we compared what $250,000 translates to in various parts of the country. Here's is a sample of what we found:

In contrast, a person making $250,000 in New York would only need $106,000 to live in Paducah. The biggest driver of the cost differences is housing. A comparable home in New York would cost $1.1 million vs. $0.2 million in Paducah. Rent for a comparable apartment, would be $3,425 vs. $550 per month.

Other costs are also significantly higher, but are much smaller in absolute terms - a doctor visit is nearly double, a hair cut is 50 percent higher and even bowling is three times more costly in NYC.

You would expect consumer goods players like Proctor and Gamble [PG 70.08 0.24 (+0.34%) ] and Coca-Cola [KO 53.83 0.31 (+0.58%) ] and retailers like Wal-Mart [WMT 59.67 0.67 (+1.14%) ] and Home Depot [HD 27.35 0.33 (+1.22%) ] to take these factors into account in their pricing models. So should the government think about cost of living when discussing income taxes? People in higher cost areas like New York and California might vote yes.

I love this fight over who is in touch with the average american. i got news for you. neither candidate is. McCain with 6 houses and beliefs and barak obamas comments, associations, and beliefs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny thing about averages. They're just....well....average.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's some interesting numbers from "Wealth, Income and Power" by Dr. G. William Domhoff, U of California:

2001 Net Worth: Top 20% of population have 85%, Top 1% = 33%

2001 Financial Wealth: Top 20% owns 91%, Top 1% = 40%

I'll try to update these figures to 2006.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I said "they" I guess I should have been more specific.

I meant the media, not the politicians. I do agree with you though, the majority of the politicians (at the national level) are really out of touch with how the "average" American lives.

I just wonder what percentage of the more conservative individuals, who believe the democrats are going to raise their taxes, are at the $250K (personal income) level.

I am in the Bill Clinton camp, leaning conservative on the fiscal side and leaning liberal on the social side. Hopefully we can get back to that program in the near future, both parties have the opportunity to bring us there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0