Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
youngie22

which range finder?

12 posts in this topic

looking at getting a new rangefinder; wondering if any one has any strong feeling either way about anything. I guess I would love it to be inexpensive, but it also needs to be waterproof and have the angle compensation technology. I have looked around at a few but have not been very satisified w/ slection. anyone know of a good place to find the "right one", or at least a good selection w/ knowledgable staff? I am planning on stopping at cabelas tomorrow sometime to pick up some essential items only caried there. thanx guys; hope you can come up with some good suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just picked up the Nikon Prostaff 550 for about $200 and it is real clear and easy to use, if you want the angle compensation buy the Archers choice by Nikon about $250, I would have bought that one, but that only reads out to 100 yards. I wanted one for Varmit hunting also.

As far as angle compensation that would be nice, but range some stuff off before you get to your stand or when you are siting in your stand look for trees that are next to the trails you think deer will be near and range them at the level you are sitting at, horizontal yardage is what you want to shoot at even if you are 25 feet up in the tree, if the deer is 10 yards form your tree it is a 10 yard shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Leupold RX-II and have been happy with it so far. Some don't like it because it has a lot of options so the view can get cluttered or confusing. I only use it for archery and leave it set accordingly. The angle compensation is generally only a couple yards 20' up a tree so it is really not that big of a deal. It is nice to know though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At a couple yards with the new bows, thats gonna make what? less than an inch of difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, if you are shooting a well tuned, fast setup, a couple yards isn't going to make that big of a difference in pin placement on the target. Remember the "bulleye" on a deer is alot bigger than a paper target wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

archers choice only to 100 yds??? would not have guessed that they would make one like that. Does the technology make it more accurate than other range finders in the 10- 90yd range? I was kind of leaning towards that one, but not likely anymore. would like to use w/ firearms too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just buy a nikon 440. i love mine and its worked VERY well for me so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

picked up nikon riflehunter 550; waterproof and angle compensation technology, thanx for your replies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever heard of a Archer Range range finder. I had been looking into cheaper models of range finders as well. I found it for $56 delivered to my door. (BTW- I am not part of the company) I just received it today so I will go out and check it tonight. I have yardages marked out from the base of my practice stand out to 45 yds. One thing I was not aware of when I bought this is that it only works from a stand height. It works off of distance from base of tree to mid chest height and then the angle to the target ranging. Check their web site out if you want. add a .com to the end of the name. I will give my report in the morning or maybe tonight. BTW- I am a newbie to bowhunting and I am cheap as he ll!

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rely on superior woodsmanship.

Actually I'm too cheap to buy a rangefinder. Skeptical of their necessity nevertheless. Binocs on the other hand are absolutely critical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried out the Archer Range range finder last night. I only had a few minutes to work with it but it preformed as promissed by the reviews. It is definately not a laser rangefinder but I did not need a expensive rangefinder as of yet. I tried it at a known distance of 40yds and it was within a yard of what I had already known the yardage to be. I think it will work fine.

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a bushnell elet 1500 arc . nice, Its amazing. I think cabelas has a close out on them now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
    • Well Molly doesn't have any snow on her.   You been drinkin?  
    • 70 pages dealing with Donald Trump and I can't find much that says anything on the positive side, of course in the past year and a half he hasn't said much that's been positive either.
  • Our Sponsors