Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Catfishunter

Floats?

10 posts in this topic

Just woundering what kinds to try and rods to match? Been using a thill big fish with a egg sinker but hard to attach a glow stick. I have been fishing them in fast current under rapids with nice bubble lines and pockets. Fishing has been good with nice channels landed. Frogs are bait of choice but big fish on cut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Kat bobbers from "Wildwolf Products" <--- google that. Gene is a super nice guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For most catfishing situations a Pole Float style will serve you well. By far my favorate style of catfishing float.

They come in weighted and non weighted versions in sizes ranging from 4" to 16". Pole floats are available in lithium battery LED lighted versions from Lindy. The lighted versions are a hoot to fish with at night for cats and just about anything else, just weight them accordingly to lessen the resistance on lighter biting fish. Weighted and non-weighted pole floats run from $2 to $7. Lighted versions run from $5 to $8.

For shallow water float work, with baits heavy enough to sink on there own, I opt for weighted Pole floats. They cast like a rocket and maintain there upwright orientation while presenting the bait. They handle current well and ride waves extremely well.

Non weighted Pole floats will in most situations require a substantial amount of weight somewhere near your bait depending on float size and bait of choice, to keep the bait in the desired depth. Exceptions to this are if you wish the Pole float to lay on the surface and pop-up in an upright position to indicate a pick-up of the bait. This works well when you desire to use the float as a method of dragging a cutbait through very shallow water with little or no current present or with bait sets designed to rest on the bottom.

The Thill larger predator cigar style balsa floats are great floats. For there size they can suspend a lot of weight and cast well. Thill's run about $5 +/-.

Large bulbous style floats, such as hollow chamber or Styrofoam beach balls, are my least favorite float to use, in any condition. They have poor casting characteristics, tangle up in mid air, and require a lot of pull to be tugged under. The wire clips top and bottom on a bulb style float, designed to fix the float in place, often damage the line too.

An economic weighted Styrofoam casting float I do recommend is designed for surface popping for strippers. It can be rigged slip or fixed, has a cupped top and is funnel chapped with a nail weight inserted into it for casting weight. It casts very well and can be used to pop-n-spit water to attract shallow water cats. They handle most cut bait and Kermit situations very well. Not as visible as a pole float though at a distance. They cost about $2 each. I found them at Sportsman's Warehouse.

A Float fishing/rigging tip: Use heavy main line (30-40-50-65 Power Pro) and a leader below a heavy ball bearing swivel (NO CHEAP SNAP SWIVELS..just a swivel). Make the leader of a lesser value (30-40# Big Game mono) than the mail line. Also use a silicone tube and bead above your swivel and below your weight to protect you knot from damage from the weight. That way when you get hung, and you will, you can break off the leader or hook....and not have to chase lost floats down river and re-rig as often.

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure does. I like the idea of draging cut across the bottom weightless, sounds good in shallow water. Looks like the billy boy bobbers lighted pole float and the weighted lighthouse slip floats are on my list, found them in the Catfish Connection catlog. I have been troting the float down rapids steering them into pockets behind bolders and deeper shoots and has worked well. Have been using a 7'6" med baitcaster with 50 pound tuff line xp as a main line and 20 pound mono as leader but sometimes I switch to my centerpin rod and reel that is used for steelhead at 11'6" foot and light action it sure is fun. Started using floats under the dam in Crookston for cats and then learning how to use them for salmonida in the rivers around duluth. I think it's the best way to cover water in the river unless your casting for bass. I need to find a longer med. action rod to work the floats the way I want but the pin is sure fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shhhhhh, you know were i'm at. Talk to gooty and get ahold of me this fall. same old thing wink. Ed i love your signature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 11' Euro style ABU Boron Predator rod rigged with a US REEL 240 SX and 40# Power Pro...I like to use it for stealth Kitty Kork'n. I can cast a Very...Long....Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyss...with it too.

You can take up a lot of line in a hurry, and slam it home when needed. It can and will handle everything from pike to sturgeon. Fun rod, super reel, I love it!

Eh...thanks for the comment on the signature. My Grandpa was a serious fisherman in his day, and that remark was one I always remember him by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like a balloon for my float. They are not great for casting, but a whole package takes up practically no space in my tackle box. When setting up my rig I thread a 1/4 inch tube (about 3 inches long) with a bead above the sinker. Then if I want to use a float I just tie a balloon to the tube and use a small rubber band (for braces) as my bobber stop.

I like them inflated rather fully so they can quickly drift out in the current or with the wind. I find with circle hooks the large balloon does a great job of setting the hook. This is a great technique if you are fishing a circular eddy. Especially when there are many rip rap snags.

For light I use the glow sticks from Bob Moore's bait store. They are about eight inches long. I attach the glow stick to the balloon with a large rubber band.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose you could put the glowstick inside the balloon as well?? Might make the whole thing light up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about a glow in the dark Condom?

Shaaaaaaa..WING!!!

Got a bite!!

laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors