Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
chasineyes

Stocking Lakes/Slots

14 posts in this topic

Here is a thought or question...We stock lakes because some lakes can't naturally reproduce right? If that is the case then why release 20-28" walleyes? If these fish can't reproduce what is the benefit of having them in the lake. Do we use them for eggs to stock other lakes then? Just curious..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think its that some lakes absolutely cannot reproduce but I think some lakes just don't reproduce as well as other. So for this reason it is best to put the largest spawning fish back as not to put additional strain on a lakes walleye population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure there are a few lakes that just can't reproduce, and which get some fairly heavy stocking.

Assuming the fish can't reproduce, the benefit from letting any fish go is so someone else (or yourself if you're lucky) can catch it at a later point in time. I realize that for a lot of walleye fishing, the goal is a dinner at the end of the day, and not just some pictures and memories of a great day on the water, but practicing CPR at any level helps reduce the stress put on a fish population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a pretty old argument and I'll put my take in. When I fish, generally any eye over 20" goes back in. If it's a slow day and I get on 21" I may or may not take it. Now, if it's withing the legal limit to keep and you want to keep a fish, then keep it. What I set as a standard for myself doesn't mean you have to. Keep what you want as long as it's legal. If it's a smaller lake though and you keep everything, don't expect it to keep producing in a couple of years to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its thier to help maintan good fishing in most lakes. not to increase population. the live ratio on fry is very good so when you see 30,000 fry dumped in that number is almost extint if you watch that year class grow to eaters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a thought or question...We stock lakes because some lakes can't naturally reproduce right? If that is the case then why release 20-28" walleyes? If these fish can't reproduce what is the benefit of having them in the lake. Do we use them for eggs to stock other lakes then? Just curious..

The lakes that are stocked that don't have any natural reproduction don't have those slots. Minnesota's main walleye lakes have a 17-28" protected slot to protect spawners. Females generally reach sexual maturity around 17 inches and their performance tops out around 28" (there are exceptions to this rule). I think you're talking about two different lakes. The eggs taken on Cutfoot Sioux/Winnibigoshish for example, might go to Lake X/Southern MN lake, where there is no slot. Meanwhile the Cutfoot/Winni slot is in place to always have a nice stock of spawners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very well said dachise! As he said, the lakes that have the slots usually do have a decent spawn.. Lakes that dont, usually dont have slots. Lakes that have Northern Slots often have those to protect them to keep the smaller fish in check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandman,

It is that attitude that is making me favor putting a slot on Cass Lake. Since there is no limit on size you are getting tons of people who are keeping both immature small walleye (12-13") as well as the big girls (20+). This makes for some up and down years and I have talked to quite a few people who fish lakes with slots and they say the fishing is just outstanding. I would not mind only taking home 3 or 4 fish a day if I was catching 100 or more fish. The problem comes when you fish all day with very few bites and you have people start panicing and keep the dinks. I guess the only way to somewhat prevent that is to legally force them to do so. If they choose to keep the dinks, they may run into a DNR boat with a pad full of tickets to issue!

Just my .02

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The overall goal is to try and keep the population in relative balance. A population that has alot of large individuals but a relatively small number of young fish (recruits) is just as problematic for a fish manager as a population that has lots of small fish and very few large fish. Whether its the lack of natural spawning or extremely heavy fishing pressure, stocking and slots are tools that are used to try and keep things in balance. The problem is its a pretty subjective science and when you throw in the other variables such as forage availability, varying spawning conditions from year to year due to weather, and changes in water quality, the goal is definitely a moving target......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you windy. I honestly wouldn't mind seeing a slot of 15 to 20" across the board with one over 26". I think that makes a pretty good slot. At least that is what I practice out side of keeping one over 26.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a plan, Sand. Now if only we could get the DNR to take a look at Cass. I know quite a few locals and guides who favor that. We may need to start a petition or something. I caught a 23 inch deep golden beauty this year, got my quick photos and let her go to make more babies! I think the slot might have to be bumped up just a bit, I think the optimal one would be anything under 14 goes back in, no questions asked, you keep the 14 to 19 inch fish and everything but one wall hanger goes back 20 inches or more. Sounds like we are both on the same page!

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a discussion that we have several times a year. An across the board slot would be a disaster as different lakes have different needs to keep a "balance." There are some lakes that the best way way to improve the overall walleye population is to keep the small ones and let the 17 inch and over ones go. Lakes that have a problem with stunted eyes such as Island and Crocodile in the Arrowhead come to mind.

Slots work very well where they are needed but they are not needed everywhere. The DNR does a fine job in my opinion. Where we start running into problems is when the politicians start messing with the science.

As far as keeping small walleyes or large ones for that matter "panicking" has nothing to do with it. I would be willing to bet that I release more walleyes than most people catch over the season. That's not bragging it's just the way it is. However, if I determine that a walleye is not going to survive after it's released I generally keep it regardless of size. I've never seen it but I've heard that there are a lot of "floaters" on lakes that have a strict slot and a lot of pressure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun,

I'm with you on that, I would keep a fish that I think is not going to make it, why be wasteful, but if it is small enough then it would be a free lunch for an eagle or other feathered friend and that is cool on the eco cycle in my book as well. I know that my grand daughters (who are 7 and 8) feel bad when they guy hook a 5 inch perch and it does not swim away when we toss it back but I show them the gulls or eagles and they watch it swoop down for a snack and they seem to feel better knowing that the bird had lunch that day, LOL !

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The benifit of releasing big fish is more than just spawning.

Release big fish to catch big fish.

Most anglers care about size, and to have a good population of big fish(any species) on a pressured lake(almost all metro) practicing catch and release or selective harvest will makes a huge difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We live in some sort of Bizarro world now - Sarah Palin calling Trump sinfully stupid.     Here's another one from Ann Coulter, who literally wrote a book "In Trump We Trust"    
    • You do realize that if the taxes were done that way, the cities would get $2.53 billion richer, and rural areas would get $2.53 billion poorer. The 7 county metro pays substantially more taxes (nearly 2/3 of the states total) than the other 80 counties in Minnesota combined, but only receives roughly half of the state expenditures.   Sorry to break it to you, but rural America is not fiscally solvent. Those citiots you speak of are bankrolling the entire country. It's easy to see on this chart: more urban states are to the left (givers) and more rural states are to the right (takers).  
    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
  • Our Sponsors