Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
reidLinden

X-85 acting flakey, or just user error?

15 posts in this topic

Hi all.

I've recently come into possession of a Lowrance X-85. Unfortunately for me, I can't really make heads or tails of it, which I find surprising, because I'm good with gadgets, generally speaking. There are two chief problems with the device, and I'll detaily them below.

#1 - even anchored, on calm water, I can't consistently get a bottom reading. Early on I chalked it up to weeds confusing the computer, but I've gotten the problems where I didn't think there should BE a problem with weeds too. It happens when the boat is moving fast (could be cavitation), or when still, and also while trolling (forward and/or backwards). Unfortunately, there are also other times where it seems to work perfectly. The basics that I seem to be seeing are that it appears to work pretty well in water over 20 feet. Between 10 and 20 feet, it seems to come and go about evenly. Below 1o feet of water, it hardly ever seems to work at all (it will occasionally return some kind of information, for a brief moment, but rarely more -- though even thats not a hard and fast rule)

#2 - Unless I have 'FishTrack' set to 'on', I see no fish. I can be parked on top of a school of fish, with maybe 50 fish icons on my screen. If I switch fishtrack to 'off' no new fishes are located. I just get a blank screen with some bottom readings. I don't see the arcs and arches that the documentation says I should see. As soon and I revert to fishtrack 'on', then I start getting readings again. Also, the types of things that I see on the screen in fishtrak on/off modes are totally different (thats probably by design, though).

I've tried a number of times to re-set the system to factory defaults, but the basics are always the same. Unless I have fishtrack on, I wont see any fish at all, and I may or may not see the bottom at any given moment.

All of this causes me to doubt the systems functionality. It also has created the joke that I am always running the finder in demo mode, and that the fish it reports aren't really there (which probably explains why I'm not catching anything either, at least in their eyes...) .

I'm not 100% convinced that something is wrong with the system. I could be user error, but I'm doubting it. Mostly. Also, in my opinion, the transducer could probably be placed better. It seems a bit too close to the engine (though that doesn't appear to me to be causing the interference the documentations suggest MIGHT happen if the engine were running and you were getting a problem), and I think it might get better readings while moving if it were mounted a bit lower (cavitation issues, perhaps). But, when in still water, its completely submerged, and I'm still not getting readings, SOMETHING is wrong.

Any advice? Is the transducer in need of replacement? Is the X-85 itself faulty and in need of replacement?

Thanks for the suggestions, its deeply appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am having similar problems with an x-51 mounted on my pontoon. Seems to only find bottom consistently when under 4 ft, otherwise doesn't seem find bottom. Fish locating is non-existant. I'll have to play with the fish tracking option to see if that exhibits simalar behavior

I am assuming that the transducer is the most likely issue, but not sure. I'm hoping the advice you get will also solve my problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would make a guess and say the transducer.

But with that unit you will have to ask yourself if it's worth putting in the money for a new transducer (and hope that fixes it) or just purchasing a new finder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like a transducer problem. And given the age of the x85 that would not be surprising at all.

dtro makea an excellent point about considering whether or not it's worth it to buy a replacement transducer for that unit. You may be better off going new, things have come a long ways since the x85 was new to the market.

I'd suggest leaving the Fish Track off (this is the setting that displays fish symbols, correct)? Most users would rather see what the screen is showing and make their own interpretations of fish, baitfish, bugs, weeds, etc. rather than rely on their unit to display a large, medium or small fish symbol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

did you change the sensitivity on the screen? And if your not seeing arches its because thier are no fish around you. when you have the little fishy symbols the locator thinks weeds are fish. when you see lots of little blips turn up the sensitivity and see if it turns into a filled arch thats baitfish. you prolly wont see full archs but half arches are usually fish. it takes getting used to but reading archs is a lot tougher than fishy symbols. if you have a clean lake (10' visibility) its really fun to find fish with your locator. its fun when you can find baitfish and then see arhs close by. thats taking full advantage of your electronics. fishing with archs is like fishing with a flasher sort of. good luck I hope I helped you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My main concern is that I have NEVER seen a single arch when not in fishtrack mode. Granted, I am new at this, but at the same time, I'm seeing fish where I think I should be seeing fish.

So, how could I test definitively whether this is malfunctioning. Can I just hook it up in my garage, and roll a ball in the cone and see the change (if any) on the screen? I seem to remember that the transducer should work in the air, but that it'd report the wrong depth, which would be okay by me. I just want to know if it functions one way or the other.

Ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is your sensitivity set at?

If its really low, it's not going to read much if anything at all.

If you set it to 50%, you should at least see something. The higher you go with sensitivity, the more it will pick up. You should get to a point where it will be tough to read because you will be picking up the smallest of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've pretty much tried out everything that made sense to me to try.

I most definately played with sensitivities from 0 to 100% and while I did see a lot more screen clutter, I didn't see any arches.

So, I'd like to come up with a test I can run in the garage, and see what I can do to get an arch in that setting, and then go on from there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might have a hard time getting those perfect little arches you see in “Demo” mode or advertised. Sometimes a fish will appear as only a large blob.

What makes me think you have a transducer issue (or a bigger problem) is that you are losing contact with the bottom, especially at low speeds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a video I took last year of what I interpreted as fish along a steep breakline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. I should take some pictures. My display is nowhere NEAR that clear as to what the bottom looks like. And I've seen pictures on the net that show good clear output from an X-85, so I know its possible.

I'm with you, I'm sure the transducer is bad. What I'm wondering is if I can set up a test where I get something on the screen in fishtrack (off) mode, so I can say, ok, the units good, just replace the transducer, or, say, ahh, that whole thing is bad, even in perfect test settings it doesn't display an arch (or whatever)

I'm just trying to narrow the scope and deal with the one issue. If I have to buy a whole new unit, I'd rather not have already bought a new transducer for an older malfunctioning model.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear ya on that.

One of the reasons I posted that video is to show you what a $100-$129 unit can do.

Not sure what the going rate is for a new trandsducer for the X-85.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I see your point now. Makes a lot of sense now that I see it spelled out for me smile

HS-WSBK Skimmer™ Transducer @ cabellas = $45

A sample of X-85 output can be found a the lowrance HSOforum, under support, under Tips & Tutorials, under Sonar Tutorial. The last two images in the tutorial are from an X-85.

Thats much more clear than my output. I'm not getting near that quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your transducer angle, the size of the fish, the resolution (pixel count) of your screen and even the depth of the water will make a difference in how your fish arches look. It's not at all uncommon for them to look more like horizontal lines or "blobs" than text-book arches.

IMO, what you need to do first is see if you can get good and consistent bottom readings (worry about fish arches later). If youi can't get bottom readings there's no way you'll get fish arches. Your transducer mouunting or electrical interference could be causing problems with your readings IF your transducer is good.

Lowrance units work well in the automatic setting for both sensitivity and grayline. I'd leave your unit set on automatic and and move around slowly, in deeper water away from weeds. And try tweaking your transducer angle and maybe the wiring to see if you can get rid of any intereference.

But I'd still guess that a bad transducer is your biggest problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I finally managed to do some testing on Saturday. I wasn't able to get a hard bottom reading off of concrete OR a full 5 gallon pail. Needless to say, I was also unable to test if the fish track bit was working with a ball. So, I'm going to try replacing the transducer sometime soon.

Thanks for all your advice, everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • 2014 F 150 and I would like to get a shorter antenna to avoid the slapping on the garage door.  I did the Googs and saw all sorts of them for under $20.  I don't know anything about this stuff and wonder if the baby ones work.  Any recommendations will be appreciated. Thanks for your time. Tom
    • Even if you kept them you probably wouldn't like the taste,   assuming you want to keep some to eat.  Trout are sad table fare, generally foul tasting and mushy. However they are a delight to pursue,  especially with light tackle.  And remember to use barbless hooks which make it easier on the trout and much easier on your hand,  ear or arm when you hook yourself. Enjoy your day on the water. You'll find,  as a noted angler once said, that trout do not live in ugly places.
    • The best  the public can hope for  is LESS political involvement and LESS lobbying pressure by  commercial interests most impacted by poor fishing in the lake. Generally speaking, if  trained and educated fishery managers are left to their own devices it will be better for the resource. It is no picnic for the F&G professionals as they are pounded by commercial interests on one hand and politicians,  who mostly mean well, on the other hand. Chances are we won't see much lessening of pressure from the resort, bar, bait and other commercial interests so that means anglers and going to have to suck it up, try to understand what the Department faces and fish other species or find other lakes. It is mighty easy to find someone to blame but the finger probably points right at YOU.  
    • Lots of different fish to chase in that lake. Just switch up your target fish and try something different.


    • Minnesota DNR News
      For Immediate Release:
      July 21, 2017
      In This Issue

      Conserving Mille Lacs walleye population requires regulation changes

      Mille Lacs Lake Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for summer 2017

      Conserving Mille Lacs walleye population requires regulation changes

      Walleye fishing on Mille Lacs Lake will remain closed until Aug. 11 to protect the walleye fishery, and ensure its long-term health and sustainability into the future

      To extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest on Mille Lacs 

      New solutions are being sought to rebuild and sustain a healthy Mille Lacs walleye fishery

      New fisheries data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources show the total safe harvest allocation for walleyes on Mille Lacs Lake (44,800 pounds) has already been exceeded this season. To protect the fishery and ensure the long-term sustainability of Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye population, the DNR announced today that walleye fishing will remain closed until Friday, Aug. 11.

      In order to extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest. Catch-and-release walleye fishing will run from Friday, Aug. 11, through Monday, Sept. 4, for the Labor Day weekend. Walleye fishing will then be closed from Tuesday, Sept. 5, through Thursday, Nov. 30.

      As these regulation changes were announced, Minnesota DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr reiterated the state’s commitment to rebuilding and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery in Mille Lacs Lake.

      “Improving the walleye population in Mille Lacs is a top priority for the DNR,” Landwehr said. “We deeply regret the hardships these new regulations will cause for anglers and business owners. But they are essential to protect and enhance the future of walleye fishing in the lake for future generations. We will continue doing everything we can to understand the challenges facing the walleye fishery, and take whatever actions we can to resolve this very difficult situation.”

      Landwehr and DNR fisheries chief Don Pereira noted that allowing for additional catch-and-release fishing in August is essential for area anglers, businesses, and Mille Lacs area communities. The decision to allow for this additional harvest was made with input from the Mille Lacs Fisheries Advisory Committee.

      “We want to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible,” Pereira said. “So even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR will dip into the allowed conservation overage to reopen the season on Aug. 11.”

      Through the closure, anglers on Mille Lacs Lake may fish for all other species in the lake including bass, muskellunge and northern pike. When fishing for other species, only artificial baits and lures will be allowed in possession, except for anglers targeting northern pike or muskie, who may fish with sucker minnows longer than 8 inches.

      A prohibition on night fishing will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. However, anglers may fish for muskie and northern pike at night, but may only use artificial lures longer than 8 inches or sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Bowfishing for rough fish also is allowed at night but possession of angling equipment is not allowed and only rough fish may be in possession.

      Understanding walleye fishing quotas on Mille Lacs this year, and why that quota was reached earlier than predicted
      The DNR and the Chippewa bands that cooperatively manage Mille Lacs Lake agreed this year to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017.

      That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the 75,000 pounds conservation cap and the 64,000 pounds combined harvest quotas – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. Bi-weekly creel surveys show that state anglers already have reached their quota.

      “The DNR is using its full allotment to maximize opportunities to fish for walleye on Mille Lacs without violating our agreement,” Pereira said. “The DNR, just like area businesses, would greatly prefer to not have fishing restrictions in place. But sustaining and stabilizing Mille Lacs’ walleye population is our primary obligation and public responsibility.”

      Continuing the walleye fishing closure will reduce the number of fish that die after being caught and released, a condition known as hooking mortality. The likelihood of fish suffering hooking mortality increases as water temperatures warm.

      High walleye catch rates on Mille Lacs have increased DNR fishing projections. A hot walleye bite attracted more anglers to the lake, resulting in angler effort that is about double what it was in 2016.

      “Cooler than normal temperatures kept hooking mortality rates low, but more anglers fished Mille Lacs, particularly catching walleye longer than 20 inches,” Pereira said. “That increased the poundage of fish caught and put us over our walleye quota.”

      According to the DNR, bigger fish are biting, in part, because there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average.

      Mille Lacs’ hot bite also reflects the findings of studies done in many other fisheries that show catchability actually increases when fish population drops. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there is more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, creating a situation where a larger percentage of the population is in position to be caught rather than gathering in a less preferred but less fished area.

      More information about Mille Lacs Lake, the regulation adjustments and management of the fishery is available on the DNR page at www.mndnr.gov/millelacslake.

      New solutions are being sought to improve and sustain a healthy walleye fishery
      The DNR announced in June that a new external review team of scientists will take a fresh look at Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye fishery, using all of the best science available to gain a better understanding of the lake. This new review, led by walleye expert Dr. Chris Vandergoot of the U.S. Geological Survey, will provide additional recommendations to improve fisheries management of the lake, and contribute to a long-term solution to improving and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery for future generations. The group’s report is expected in time to help guide and inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season.

      DNR encourages Minnesotans to fish for other abundant species on Mille Lacs Lake
      As today’s walleye fishing regulation changes were announced, the DNR encouraged all Minnesotans to visit Mille Lacs Lake to fish the other abundant species that the lake has to offer. Mille Lacs Lake’s other opportunities for top-notch fishing will not be affected by the regulation adjustment.

      Bassmaster Magazine named Mille Lacs the nation’s best bass lake in June and will send 50 of the country’s best anglers to the lake In September for its Angler of the Year tournament. Northern pike abound in Mille Lacs, along with muskellunge. In early July, a woman from southern Minnesota caught and released in Mille Lacs what may have been Minnesota’s largest-ever muskellunge.

      To learn more about Mille Lacs Lake and its many great fishing opportunities, visit the DNR page. To plan visit to the Mille Lacs area, visit the Mille Lacs Area Tourism Council page.

      ###

      Mille Lacs Lake Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for summer 2017
      Q: What is happening with the walleye season this summer on Mille Lacs Lake?

      A: The closure that began July 8 and was set to end July 28 is being extended by two weeks. That means walleye fishing will reopen at 6:01 a.m. on Aug. 11 for catch-and-release only through Labor Day. A night fishing closure also will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30.

      Q: How does this affect fishing for other species?

      A: Fishing regulations for other species such as smallmouth bass, muskie and northern pike remain the same. During the night closure, there is an exception for muskie and northern pike anglers using artificial lures and sucker minnows longer than 8 inches.

      Q: Why did the DNR extend the closure?

      A: While the DNR wants to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible, the state is also required to abide by cooperative agreements made with eight American Indian Chippewa bands. The two weeks of additional closure allows the state to abide by a harvest quota set earlier this year with the bands.

      The DNR and the bands agreed to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be sustainably harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017 in order to conserve the population

      That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the conservation cap of 75,000 pounds and the combined harvest quota of 64,000 pounds – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure.

      The latest creel survey data shows that state anglers reached their quota of 44,800 pounds of walleye caught from Mille Lacs in early July. Even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR is dipping into the allowed conservation reserve in order to reopen the season on Aug. 11.

      Q: Why has the walleye population in Mille Lacs declined? What is the DNR doing in the long-term to try to conserve the population?

      A: The vast majority of walleye that hatch do not survive to their third autumn in the lake. Walleye numbers have declined to the point that it has become important to protect spawning-sized walleye, particularly the class of walleye that hatched in 2013. It is important to protect the large 2013 year class to replenish aging spawning stock.  Most males from the 2013 class are now mature, but females will not start to contribute in large numbers until next spring. The state is committed to conserving the population of walleyes born in 2013 to improve and rebuild a sustainable population for the future.

      Q: Why do we count hooking mortality during a closed walleye season?

      A: The amount that state anglers can kill (as spelled out in state-bands agreements) also must include fish that die as a result of hooking mortality, the fish that die after being caught and then released back into the water. During the closure, some anglers still catch walleye incidentally and some of those fish die after being released. Under the state-band agreements, those dead fish must be calculated and counted against the state’s allocation.

      Q: How did this cooperative management between the state and the bands of Mille Lacs Lake come to be?   

      A: Recall that in 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld lower-court decisions that allowed the Mille Lacs band and seven other Chippewa bands to exercise off-reservation fishing and hunting rights. The lower federal court also set up guidelines, known as stipulations and protocols, for both sides to follow. These stipulations and protocols provide a framework for how the bands and the state must work cooperatively to manage shared natural resources, including Mille Lacs fish.  In their agreements, the DNR and the bands are required to annually establish the number of walleye that can safely be harvested from Mille Lacs while ensuring sufficient remaining walleye in the lake for a healthy fishery.

      Q: If the walleye population is in decline, why are anglers catching so many?

      A: Fish are biting for two reasons. First, there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Second, studies in many fisheries show that catchability actually increases when fish population decline.

      In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there’s more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, and anglers find these spots where they can catch a larger portion of fish. Finally, while the walleye population has decreased considerably (by half or more), the amount of fishing pressure has declined by a lot more. This means that there are more walleye per angler fishing Mille Lacs today.

      Q: How is the DNR using science and research to help the walleye population?

      A: Mille Lacs Lake is the most studied lake in Minnesota. It is also a complex and changing system. The agency conducts a large number of surveys on the lake annually. These surveys include assessing the abundance of young walleye; setting 52 nets to assess adult abundance; using fine-mesh nets each summer to determine abundance of food (prey fish) for walleye; and using interviews with anglers around the lake (called creel surveys) to estimate the number of fish anglers are catching. The DNR also periodically tags walleye and other species to provide actual population estimates. We are tagging bass this year in cooperation with angling groups, and will be tagging walleye in 2018 and 2019 when the 2013 year class will be reaching full maturity.

      Q: What is the purpose of the external review the DNR has initiated?

      A: The DNR has asked Dr. Chris Vandergoot to lead an independent review of the DNR’s scientific approaches to manage Mille Lacs Lake. Vandergoot is a key member of the international team that co-manages a very significant walleye fishery in Lake Erie. He works for the U.S. Geological Survey in the Sandusky Lake Erie Biological station in Ohio. His review report will be available to the public in early 2018 and will help inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season.

      Q: What does the future look like for Mille Lacs walleye?

      A: It is unlikely that Mille Lacs walleye production will return to the levels that state anglers enjoyed over 20 years ago.  The ecosystem of Mille Lacs is going through extreme change, starting with increased water clarity in the mid-1990s, to impacts today from aquatic invasive species such as spiny water flea and zebra mussels. Longer growing seasons are also helping some species such as smallmouth bass but may be hurting others. While walleye will still be abundant, the future fishery will be more diverse, offering angling opportunities for a greater variety of fish.

      ###
    • Lots of politics.  Probably more info in the mille lacs section 
    • Great info!  I haven't done much trout fishing outside of lake trout, so can you tell me if you're allowed to keep any or all of these fish or is it a catch and release fishery only?
    • So what is going on with Mille Lacs?
    • Anyone have any experiance with these?   http://northernlightsrattlereel.com/    
  • Our Sponsors